Council denies keeping landlords in the dark as huge licensing scheme launches
Durham Council waited three weeks after launching its selective licensing scheme to share the news on its website – potentially leaving some landlords in the dark.
Despite announcing it had won approval back in December for a launch on 1st April, the council’s website went quiet on the subject until 21st April.
The NRLA and other landlord groups have often criticised selective licensing schemes for their poor communication; Southend landlords were recently frustrated by their council’s failure to update them about registration delays.
Lynn Hall, Durham County Council’s strategic manager for housing, tells LandlordZONE it had previously told landlords the application process would open in early February.
She adds: “At the same time, we contacted all landlords and agents that we had email and postal addresses for and issued public notices in local and regional newspapers.
“We also shared information with local councillors, parish councils, MPs and relevant housing advice centres and agencies to ensure details of the scheme were shared as widely as possible.”
Encourage landlords
It plans to further promote the scheme over the coming months to encourage landlords to apply before compliance checks begin; they will need to fork out £500 per property for the five-year scheme, with a £60 early-bird discount available until the end of July.
At least 29,000 properties, 42% of the county’s PRS, are covered by the scheme. Durham County Council had originally approved a plan that covered 65% of the county and included 51,000 private rented properties, however following a consultation it submitted a smaller application.
Councillor James Rowlandson (pictured) cabinet member for resources, investments and assets, says the scheme is a key objective of County Durham’s housing strategy and will raise the standards of private rented properties, improve the health and wellbeing of tenants and cut anti-social behaviour.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Council denies keeping landlords in the dark as huge licensing scheme launches | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Council denies keeping landlords in the dark as huge licensing scheme launches
BREAKING: Number of landlords chasing tenants for rental debts jumps by 180%
The number of landlords seeking to recover debts owed to them by former tenants has risen nearly two-fold, latest figures from leading evictions specialist Landlord Action reveals.
It says that over the past 12 months the number of landlords seeking to recover money owed by former tenants has jumped by 180% year-on-year.
This is because in the past many landlords worn down by protracted eviction battles have written off debts rather than chasing tenants for repayment.
But an increasing number of renters have been using the pandemic evictions ban to wilfully dodge paying rent, rather than because they are in financial difficulties it is claimed.
And because of the 14-month PRS eviction ban during Covid, these rent arrears are now eye-watering sums, which many landlords involved cannot afford to lose.
Paul Shamplina (main picture), founder of Landlord Action and commercial officer at Hamilton Fraser, says: “We have hundreds of live debt recovery cases, ranging from a few thousand pounds right up to one where the arrears have reached £200,000.
“Admittedly, this is an extremely rare case, but what many of our cases have in common is that the tenants had the means to pay. For example, one case is against a practising doctor who owes £42,000.”
Case study: Philip Robinson
Philip had tenants who stopped paying rent in October 2019, four months prior to the national lockdown.
They remained in situ throughout the pandemic but would not communicate with him or the letting agent.
They finally left without surrendering the keys or informing him that they had vacated. Having caused significant damage, Philip decided to pursue the tenants’ arrears through Landlord Action’s debt recovery service. In October 2021, the team recovered £14,950.
Philip Robinson says: “I have always been very fair and taken my tenants’ personal circumstances into account, but this tenant ran a company which had £250,000 in the bank.
“They abused the restrictions put in place by the Government which were designed to help those in need.
“The tenants purchased a property, renovated it and managed to pay the mortgage, all whilst living in my property for free.
“If more tenants like this knew there would be repercussions, such as a County Court Judgement, I believe they would cooperate much earlier in the proceedings.”
How do debts get paid?
Once a judge has granted possession, they will then look at the arrears schedule to see what the landlord is owed.
As part of the judgement, the judge will order that the tenant pay the arrears owed which will include costs incurred by the landlord for bringing the claim and interest in an amount the court sees fit.
The tenant will then be issued with a County Court Judgement (CCJ). If, however, the tenant does not pay the money that is owed, the landlord can then move to enforcement by instructing a debt recovery company, like Landlord Action.
The Money Judgment is not registered as a CCJ on the Register of CCJ’s Court Orders and Fines until the landlord attempts to enforce the judgement.
Shamplina adds: “If there are substantial arrears and the tenant is employed with a steady level of income, therefore has the means to pay, but has simply stopped paying, it is worth pursuing the money that is legally and rightfully owed to the landlord.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – BREAKING: Number of landlords chasing tenants for rental debts jumps by 180% | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: BREAKING: Number of landlords chasing tenants for rental debts jumps by 180%
LATEST: 18% of tenants rank ‘pet friendly’ lets as main priority when house hunting
Nearly one in five tenants rank permission to keep pets in their top three priorities for renting a home, new research has found.
A report by the Social Market Foundation, sponsored by Paragon Bank – Where next for the private rented sector? – highlights how 18% of tenants particularly look for landlords who allow four-legged friends into their homes.
Despite this, government statistics show only 7% of landlords market their properties as ‘pet friendly’.
The survey quizzed more than 1,300 renters and found that they most value aspects that enhance their experience, with outdoor space alongside permission to own pets among their top priorities.
The most important consideration is the monthly rent cost – a top three priority for 55% of those surveyed – followed by property size, in terms of the number of bedrooms, which is prioritised by 35% of renters.
In terms of what is important about the area where rented accommodation is located, being close enough to work was a priority for just under one in four renters (38%), followed by public transport facilities (37%) and shops (36%).
Richard Rowntree (pictured), mortgages MD for Paragon Bank, says the study shows that tenants are likely to stay in a property for the long-term and want to make it a real home, so he encouraged landlords to consider how they can facilitate that.
Rowntree adds: “In the current economic climate, we’re likely to see further pressure on rents but it is encouraging to know that there are things that landlords can do to improve the experience of renters.
“By listening to tenants and working to meet their needs, we can help to provide houses that people will be happy to call home which benefits the renters, landlords and wider community.”
Have your opinion on pets heard
LandlordZONE is supporting an ongoing effort by campaigning group AdvoCATS to find out landlord attitudes to pet damage to properties. Have your say here.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – LATEST: 18% of tenants rank ‘pet friendly’ lets as main priority when house hunting | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: LATEST: 18% of tenants rank ‘pet friendly’ lets as main priority when house hunting
Pandemic has exposed weaknesses in rent-to-rent, PRS annual report reveals
The weakness inherent in the rent-to-rent model have been exposed by the rent arrears caused by the economic downturn created by the Covid lockdowns, the annual report from redress scheme the PRS has revealed.
Rent-to-rent is where a landlord permits a third party – usually a letting agency – to take over the management of their property in return for a ‘guaranteed income’.
The letting agent then makes a profit on the difference between the income paid to the landlord and the rent charged to the tenants. The properties are often operated as HMOs.
But the profits can be thin and the PRS says that last year rent-to-rent was the only sector where it saw a large increase in complaints.
Landlords have been left high and dry during Covid by failed third-party firms and agents engaged by them to operate a rent-to-rent agreement – largely because losses from rent arrears rendered these types of agreements uneconomic.
“Many of these [rent-to-rent] businesses struggled during lockdown and the increase in rent arrears that resulted during the pandemic led to a lot of problems,” says Sean Hooker, Head of Redress at the PRS (main picture).
Read a recent case we reported on about a landlord trapped in a dodgy rent-to-rent agreement.
The PRS annual report also warns landlords and letting agents that the private rented sector is ‘on the cusp of dramatic reform’ when the Government’s Renting Reform Bill proposals are unveiled in the Queen’s Speech next month.
Membership
During 2021, the PRS had a membership of 16,272 estate agents, an increase of 9% on 2020 and of whom 81% are letting agents.
Landlords may soon have to join a redress scheme too – assuming proposals to include landlord redress in the Bill come to fruition.
Complaints about agents reduced by 2.4% last year to 1,872. In lettings, the top complaints by landlords and tenants about agents were a lack of ‘duty of care’, disputed terms of business and disputes over tenancy agreements, completing inventories and deposits.
The report also includes a case study involving a disputed £9,600 ‘sourcing fee’ charged by an agent to a rent-to-rent property, a case that highlights the world of such sourcing fees but also, in this case, how the description of the property failed to reflect the true condition of the property.
Read the PRS annual report in full.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Pandemic has exposed weaknesses in rent-to-rent, PRS annual report reveals | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Pandemic has exposed weaknesses in rent-to-rent, PRS annual report reveals
By reducing the tax on properties landlords can reduce rents?
Following the recent sky news and shelter report regarding section 21 and many tenants being asked to leave, surely now is the time to review the section 24 tax increase, perhaps owing to some landlords having to increase rents to cover the additional tax cost?
View Full Article: By reducing the tax on properties landlords can reduce rents?
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’