BLOG: It’s time private landlords took a wider role in providing social housing
This winter will be a perfect storm for homelessness in the UK, as rising rents, energy and food prices, combined with the end of several government support initiatives, including the universal credit uplift and the furlough scheme.
For households already in arrears from Covid-19, and Citizens Advice believe that half a million more renters have gone into arrears since the first lockdown in 2020, the next few months and years could be when the true impact of the pandemic is finally felt.
Even before Covid, however, the UK was already facing a significant homelessness problem.
The government, in collaboration with local council and not-for-profit organisations, rallied during the pandemic to provide temporary emergency relief for frontline homelessness.
The Big Issue believes it is significantly cheaper to prevent homelessness proactively than to let it spiral, yet while the weight of responsibility still largely falls on the public sector to do so, it is the UK private sector that is now largely responsible for social housing.
In fact, privately-run housing associations have provided the majority of social homes since they outstripped local councils for the first time in 2008.
And private landlords, while benefitting from Right to Buy policies which saw socially rented properties move into private hands, have also increased their share over the years, largely due to the ongoing undersupply and underfunding of social rental housing.
Doubled in size
Since the high of 2003, homeownership in the UK has fallen from 71% to 64%, and the private rental market has doubled in size in that time, with this type of housing being particularly common in cities, for lower-income households and young adults.
It is why there must be more collaboration between the public and the private sector if we are going to tackle the upcoming homelessness crisis, whether that be homelessness via domestic violence, rough sleeping, substance misuse or no-fault evictions.
For several reasons, housing supply in the UK is incredibly unresponsive to demand: construction faces an affordability issue, while demand for social housing always outstrips supply as prices are kept significantly below the market level. It is therefore up to us to focus on how existing stock can be better utilised.
The majority of social homes in the UK are now provided by private, non-profit organizations that offer low-cost housing for those in need of a home, but private landlords and investors can still play a larger role.
Guaranteed rent
If you’re a landlord, using your property for social housing means you still benefit from a guaranteed rental income at market value from housing providers, paid each and every month, even if the property is empty.
It also comes without all the normal stresses involved with renting a property, and a fully managed service that includes regular property inspections at no extra cost.
Providing low-cost transitional housing in this way can provide additional income to landlords with long-lease agreement of up to five years.
It also gives landlords the opportunity to become part of the solution, and to make a positive social impact with their properties.
Homelessness takes many forms and the people companies like Lotus Sanctuary often help are not often who you’d expect to be homeless.
Domestic abuse
For example, 61% of homeless females in the UK are victims of domestic abuse or violence and Parliament believes this problem, while typically difficult to measure, rose exponentially in lockdown with evidence that cases are escalating in seriousness and complexity, with Dame Vera Baird referring to it as the “epidemic within the pandemic.”
Safe accommodation is needed for these victims but is not always able to be provided by local council, especially if you consider this means being housed in the same area as your perpetrator.
This is just one example of where private landlords can step in, move quickly, and be able to assist people who need urgent accommodation. With more access to housing the private and public sectors can work together to the benefit of each other, as well as those who need it.
Gurpaal Judge is the founder and CEO of Lotus Sanctuary, a community-interest company on a mission to house and empower vulnerable people facing homelessness.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – BLOG: It’s time private landlords took a wider role in providing social housing | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: BLOG: It’s time private landlords took a wider role in providing social housing
ANALYSIS: The build-to-rent movement is gathering pace…
Build-to-rent is still small beer in relation to the rental property market as a whole; it makes a small dent into the Private Rented Sector (PRS), nonetheless it is “building” steadily and every unit built adds to the competition in some locations for small-scale landlords.
The changing nature of the housing market
Home ownership used to be the aspiration of virtually every young person. It was the basic housing model for Britons right up to the year 2000. Up to then 70% of homes were in owner occupation. This was a much higher proportion that in most other Western European nations.
In Britain, getting onto the housing ladder was every young couple’s expectation. It facilitated nicely a sensible financial life plan, it could ride the inflationary price waves, allowing couples to trade up regularly throughout their working lifespan, eventually using their property’s value as part of their pension.
But gradually this this dream scenario started to falter for many people. House prices started to climb out of the reach of the masses. The deposits needed to secure a mortgage rose out of the reach of the majority who aspired to own. So without the help of wealthy parents – the bank of Mum and Dad – they had limited options.
Help-to-buy
Even with the Government’s generous help-to-buy scheme, demand for new homes for sale declined quite dramatically, with the taxpayer payouts seeming to benefit the housebuilders more than the intended recipients, and it led to even higher house prices.
Forced to rent
Consequently, millions turned to renting from small scale landlords who in turn were financing their rentals with the ubiquitous buy-to-let mortgage. The change allowed thousands of middle class individuals to become private landlords, who in turn were riding the property price inflation waves and providing themselves with substantial pension pots.
Some of these private landlords built up substantial portfolios of rentals to the point were you could call them professional landlords. Now over over five million households are provided by these landlords in what is now a very substantial provision of housing – what is called the Private Rented Sector (PRS).
The steady growth of build-to-rent – the next wave is coming
In a move to what the Government sees as professionalising the private rented sector, mirroring those large scale managed units provided in the US, it is encouraged the growth of build-to-rent. This is being funded by financial institutions, large scale developers and property managers.
KKR, a giant American private equity group, is the latest financial institution to finance an ambitious scheme to build 4,000 build-to-rent flats. The financial behemoth KKR is investing £610 million in a joint venture with Apache Capital Partners. The property investment specialist is to build on development sites in Birmingham, Brighton and Hove and London. They are also keen to look at what they call other “core cities” in the UK.
According to The Times newspaper, these flats are to be built by Moda Living, a company owned by family money, the Caddick family, who are also owners of the Headingley cricket ground, Yorkshire county cricket club’s home, and they co-own the Leeds Rhinos rugby league team.
Moda are sourcing sites and will take them through planning and development stage, while Apache Capital will look for investors, in the current case KKR.
Once they are built, the 4,000 flats are estimated to be worth about £1.7 billion. The rentals will be high-end units aimed at professionals with on site community facilities like co-working spaces, gyms, cinema rooms, and terraces. Moda and Apache are to manage the buildings, while KKR will collect the rent. Apache is to hang on to a minority stake in the flats, and will take a small slice of the rent.
Big finance
One of the world’s biggest biggest private equity firms, KKR co founded by Americans Jerome Kohlberg, Henry Kravis and George Roberts was the inspiration behind the book and eventually the film “Barbarians at the Gate.”
It’s several years ago that the UK Government tried to kick start the build-to-rent initiative, and it’s taken years for the movement to gather momentum, but gather momentum it has. It’s beginning to happen now and the market is starting to establish itself in Britain.
Join the club – they are getting in on the act
Legal & General and Lloyds Bank have both made big commitments into build-to-rent in recent years. More recently The John Lewis Partnership made a surprise announcement that it too was to join the fray. It plans to build around 10,000 rental homes on land it already owns over the next decade or so are materialising, as a part of its diversification strategy.
Wall Street bank Goldman Sachs has committed £200 million to buying 700 homes which are to be rented out to families, while Savills, the estate agency, estimates that 14,000 build-to-rent homes were completed last year, twice as many as were built in 2017.
Savills has forecast that the number of build-to-rent homes built each year could double again by 2026. It has said that “the appetite for build-to-rent from the investment community could support such a level of growth” and that “The only part of the private house building market that we expect to be appreciably larger in 2026 compared with 2020 is build-to-rent.”
Look out in the future
These are important trends and developments in the UK rented sector. It’s something that all small-scale landlords need to keep a wary eye on. It will take some time for this scale of development to affect the gigantic PRS small-scale landlord market as a whole, but in some locations the effect will be substantial.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – ANALYSIS: The build-to-rent movement is gathering pace… | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: ANALYSIS: The build-to-rent movement is gathering pace…
OFFICIAL data: Sharp decline in Section 21 evictions debunks ‘crisis’ claims
Fewer landlords are using Section 21 notices to evict tenants, assessment of official data by the National Residential Landlords Association has revealed.
These are the ‘no fault’ eviction notices that landlords use to evict tenants often when they wish to sell a property or move back in themselves, and the tenant will not leave voluntarily.
This kind of eviction is under the spotlight – many housing groups including Shelter and Generation Rent want to see them banned, and the government has said they will be replaced when its rental reform bill goes through parliament next year.
But the government’s own data shows that the use of Section 21 notices plummeted by 55% over the past two years and, although this is in part due to the Covid evictions ban, it’s also part of a trend.
Section 21 cases dropped by 50% between 2015 and 2019 which can be explained, to a significant extent, by more and more landlords using Section 8 evictions which, although more expensive, can be faster than a Section 21 when notice periods are included.
Peddled
“These figures dispel the myth, peddled by some, that landlords spend much of their time looking for ways to evict tenants for no reason,” says Ben Beadle (pictured), Chief Executive of the NRLA.
“Whilst we condemn any landlord who abuses the system, it is vital to remember that most tenants and landlords enjoy a good relationship.
“It is in that spirit that the Government should develop its plans for a system to replace Section 21 in its forthcoming White Paper on rental reform.”
The NRLA is calling for clear and comprehensive grounds upon which landlords can legitimately repossess properties including anti-social behaviour, and for the process in these cases to be speeded up.
At present, it can take an average of almost 59 weeks from a private landlord making a claim to repossess a property to it actually happening.
Annual decline
“The use of Section 21 accelerated applications has been declining every year for the past five years,” says evictions expert Paul Shamplina (pictured).
“As well as the pandemic, the measures within the Deregulation Act 2015 to prevent retaliatory evictions has played a part in lowering the use of Section 21 notices, as has the increasing use of selective licensing by local authorities.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – OFFICIAL data: Sharp decline in Section 21 evictions debunks ‘crisis’ claims | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: OFFICIAL data: Sharp decline in Section 21 evictions debunks ‘crisis’ claims
OFFICIAL data: Section 21 evictions slump scotches ‘crisis’ claims
Fewer landlords are using Section 21 notices to evict tenants, assessment of official data by the National Residential Landlords Association has revealed.
These are the ‘no fault’ eviction notices that landlords use to evict tenants often when they wish to sell a property or move back in themselves, and the tenant will not leave voluntarily.
This kind of eviction is under the spotlight – many housing groups including Shelter and Generation Rent want to see them banned, and the government has said they will be replaced when its rental reform bill goes through parliament next year.
But the government’s own data shows that the use of Section 21 notices plummeted by 55% over the past two years and, although this is in part due to the Covid evictions ban, it’s also part of a trend.
Section 21 cases dropped by 50% between 2015 and 2019 which can be explained, to a significant extent, by more and more landlords using Section 8 evictions which, although more expensive, can be faster than a Section 21 when notice periods are included.
Peddled
“These figures dispel the myth, peddled by some, that landlords spend much of their time looking for ways to evict tenants for no reason,” says Ben Beadle (pictured), Chief Executive of the NRLA.
“Whilst we condemn any landlord who abuses the system, it is vital to remember that most tenants and landlords enjoy a good relationship.
“It is in that spirit that the Government should develop its plans for a system to replace Section 21 in its forthcoming White Paper on rental reform.”
The NRLA is calling for clear and comprehensive grounds upon which landlords can legitimately repossess properties including anti-social behaviour, and for the process in these cases to be speeded up.
At present, it can take an average of almost 59 weeks from a private landlord making a claim to repossess a property to it actually happening.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – OFFICIAL data: Section 21 evictions slump scotches ‘crisis’ claims | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: OFFICIAL data: Section 21 evictions slump scotches ‘crisis’ claims
ROGUE landlord convicted of illegally evicting pregnant tenant
A rogue landlord whose proeprty is also the subject of a prohibition order has been fined for illegally evicting a pregnant tenant and her partner from their home and throwing their belongings into the street.
Businesswoman Lidia Szopinska, from Camden, rented a room in a house she owned in Townsend Street, Cheltenham, to the couple for nine months in May 2019. After they gave notice to leave the property early, relations soured and Szopinska made allegations of breach of tenancy.
The couple had agreed to leave the property on 19th August 2019 but on 14th July, when they returned home after visiting relatives, they found the landlord standing outside with all their possessions on the street.
Magistrates ruled that she was guilty of illegally evicting the pair. Szopinska was fined £180 with £2,010 costs and ordered to pay £1,560 compensation to the couple for the distress caused, the non-return of their deposit, rent repayment and for the loss of a bag containing a laptop and other items that were stolen from outside the property.
Prohibition order
Earlier this year, Szopinska had her appeal against a prohibition order made in December 2020 relating to the same property thrown out.
The council had prevented her from renting the basement after it identified a Category 1 fire hazard; there was no adequate and unobstructed means of escape, fire doors, automatic fire detection or alarm system.
She blamed Covid complications and the fact she had been given the wrong address as the reason for her appeal being made outside the 28-day time limit.
However, a First Tier Property Tribunal ruled that she knew that the limit applied and was not convinced that Covid would impact on her ability to deal with the appeal process.
Cheltenham Council enforcement manager, Mark Nelson, says: “No landlord can act outside the law and we will do everything in our power to ensure tenants can live in rented properties safe in the knowledge that we are there to protect them from illegal eviction.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – ROGUE landlord convicted of illegally evicting pregnant tenant | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: ROGUE landlord convicted of illegally evicting pregnant tenant
Specific HMRC form for – Rent a room Method B?
My daughter bought a house which she shares with two friends as her tenants. They pay below market value rents for the area, but this year the rental income will be above the £7,500 annual rent a room allowance.
She wants to opt for “Method B”
The post Specific HMRC form for – Rent a room Method B? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Specific HMRC form for – Rent a room Method B?
LATEST: Councils hammer London landlords with fines totalling £1m in 2021
Fines for London’s errant landlords and letting agents have totalled £1 million in less than a year as councils pick up the pace of enforcement efforts.
Geospatial technology firm Kamma reports that penalties have increased from £6,052,932 in December 2020 to £7,128,973 at the start of November, a jump of £600,000 in the last four months, and a £372,874 increase since October. This is the total levied since the company set up its database in 2017.
Earlier this year, Kamma – the only company to track the Mayor of London’s Rogue Landlord and Agent Checker – reported a 532% increase in fines between May and July as local authorities embarked on post-lockdown enforcement.
Since the start of 2021, it has seen an average increase of £89,670 in fines every month, with Camden council topping the enforcement league table as the most active in terms of number of fines, followed closely by Newham and Southwark.
Hammersmith and Fulham is now the London borough with the highest average fines of £19,800, followed by Hillingdon with an average of £13,500, and Hackney with £11,250.
With increases across the region, letting agents and landlords have to stay on top of their game, says Kamma CEO Orla Shields (pictured): “The lettings market is more regulated than ever before. Licensing schemes, fines and enforcement through Rent Repayment Orders are all increasing, so it’s vital agents act to protect themselves, their landlords and of course their tenants.”
Landlords and letting agents face fines of up to £30,000 for failing to comply with safety and licensing regulations, and additional fines of up to £5,000 per property for non-compliance with MEES regulations.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – LATEST: Councils hammer London landlords with fines totalling £1m in 2021 | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: LATEST: Councils hammer London landlords with fines totalling £1m in 2021
The Property Investors Awards team are delighted to announce the winners for 2021
With celebrations usually consisting of an illustrious evening of fine dining and entertainment to announce the winners, this year announcements were made virtually. It has never been more important to ensure we continue to celebrate the very best in the property investment sector.
The post The Property Investors Awards team are delighted to announce the winners for 2021 appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: The Property Investors Awards team are delighted to announce the winners for 2021
The potential of Open Finance and the digitisation of tax records
The world is undergoing huge changes. With coronavirus pushing the economy to the limit, people are questioning the role of established institutions.
And if finance doesn’t work to enable the economy, businesses or individuals, then who is it for?
Before the digital revolution, financial experts were seen as a necessity. They knew how things worked, what everything meant and could provide good advice from the heart of the financial sector.
But now trading can be done by anyone online, with a wealth of information available to hand.
Traditional banking models are already being upended by technology. Through Open Banking, challenger banks are able to connect services digitally, cutting inefficiencies and costs while speeding up transactions.
Open Finance is seeking to build on this model to connect financial services via technology, potentially making the existing financial model obsolete.
Open Finance
Open Finance has the potential to transfer power back to individuals. Not only would this benefit society, but it would help minimise the boom-bust cycles that cripple entire economies.
No individual would be too big to fail, and bailing people out would cost far less, having minimal impact on the economy overall. With more information available to them, Open Finance businesses will be able to use technology to make better decisions instantly.
While it is still very early days for Open Finance, there seems to be an endless raft of possibilities to benefit individuals, businesses and national economies. Faster, more secure, and less risky access to credit can help grow the economy, transforming finance from something that benefits a few wealthy capitalists to something that enables growth in the real economy.
So how else could Open Finance benefit society?
Tax information
Most working people pay income tax, either via self-assessment or PAYE, and we all have tax records with a wealth of financial information that has been verified, at least in part, by HMRC.
This centralised repository of financial information could be put to better use, such as allowing credit reference agencies to better understand an individual’s risk profile or helping to prove income as part of a mortgage application.
Unfortunately, HMRC is a black hole of information ‒ its sheer size and power sucks information in, but nothing comes back out again.
However, with Making Tax Digital (MTD), HMRC are effectively allowing individuals to keep validated tax records on the software of their choice.
Software providers may then be able to use this information to enable certain aspects of Open Finance. The information doesn’t need to be protected by HMRC, it is the individual’s choice and responsibility over how to use their own information.
As MTD software develops, we will see it connected to Open Banking, allowing self-assessed taxpayers to connect their business account directly to the software, leaving the taxpayer to simply check the details, add any adjustments, and click submit.
MRC would then validate the records, providing assurance for any financial institutions using that financial information. (want to keep up to date with all things MTD – Join the APARI Community here)
More growth, lower risk
With access to complete and validated financial information, lenders would be able to more quickly and accurately assess individual risk when considering a loan application. This would speed up the process of applying for a loan for a property purchase.
Take residential landlords, for example. They may own a few properties already, with equity coming out of their ears.
If that landlord wants to obtain another property, they’d need to get their accountant to pull together their paperwork, complete an SA302, and send everything off to their mortgage advisors who would then validate the information before submitting the mortgage application.
The application can then take months to approve, slowing down the process and potentially leading to missed opportunities. Since property sales usually occur in a chain (the owner of the property you are purchasing is usually purchasing another property, and so on), these inefficiencies slow the process down for everyone and can have major impacts.
If, however, mortgage applicants could simply share validated financial/tax records, mortgage providers could use that information to make quick decisions with reduced risk. What’s more, applicants could share only relevant, high-level information, rather than expose their entire financial history.
Individual risk management
Currently, individuals can manage their credit score/risk profile via third party providers like Experian, Equifax and TransUnion.
These credit reporting agencies use limited information, such as credit cards, store cards and loans to assess risk. Individuals need to understand what factors each agency uses to ‘game’ the system.
For example, someone who has always been careful with their money, kept to a strict budget and never taken out a loan or credit card will have a far worse credit rating than someone who regularly uses debt to finance their lifestyle. So, even though they may have amassed a good deal of savings, they cannot get a good deal on a loan or mortgage. With Open Finance, these individuals would be able to quickly prove their earnings, spending, and savings, decreasing their risk profile in line with reality.
MTD software providers will be in a unique position to develop a two-sided marketplace for finance, allowing credit providers to match products to individuals’ risk profiles. When a customer needs a loan, credit card or mortgage, they can simply browse products for which they have already been approved, applying and receiving finance instantly.
Ultimately, Open Finance has the potential to help the UK and other nations recover from the seemingly unending series of crises that have plagued the early 21st century by allowing people to access finance quicker in order to grow their business and personal finances while reducing risk, inefficiencies, and costs.
Want to find out more about Open Finance and how MTD could help make finance more accessible? Submit your questions for the APARI webinar, in conjunction with LandlordZone (30th November 2021) and get the answers you need!
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – The potential of Open Finance and the digitisation of tax records | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: The potential of Open Finance and the digitisation of tax records
BREAKING: Government toughens up smoke and C0 alarm regulations
Social and private landlords are to face tougher new rules which make it mandatory to fit smoke alarms in all rented accommodation regardless of tenure, and widen the conditions under which they must be fitted.
Revisions to the smoke and carbon monoxide detector regulations also require carbon monoxide alarms to be fitted when new appliances such as gas boilers or fires are installed in any rented home.
All landlords – in both private and social sectors – also now have to repair or replace smoke and carbon monoxide alarms once told they are faulty.
Timothy Douglas (pictured), policy manager at Propertymark, believes the change is both welcome and necessary to improve tenant safety.
“Private landlords have been required since 2015 to provide working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors where applicable in rented property, and the extension of the regulations to encompass gas boilers is a sensible amendment,” he says.
“Propertymark has long called for tenants to receive the same level of protection, irrespective of tenure, and these changes go some way to rectifying that.”
However, Douglas adds that in order for landlords to be able to make necessary checks, they need to be given flexibility and greater clarity.
“The current requirement for alarms to be tested on the first day of a tenancy is impractical for many agents and landlords, and more workable measures are needed.”
Eddie Hughes MP (pictured), Minister for Rough Sleeping and Housing, says about 20 people are killed each year in accidental carbon monoxide poisoning, and many more through house fires.
“I’m proud that the new rules being proposed will ensure even more homes are fitted with life-saving alarms.” Says Hughes:
“Whether you own your home, are privately renting or in social housing – everyone deserves to feel safe and this is an incredibly important step in protecting those at risk.”
The government has promised to update guidance relating to where alarms are fitted and to ensure alarms meet relevant standards.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – BREAKING: Government toughens up smoke and C0 alarm regulations | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: BREAKING: Government toughens up smoke and C0 alarm regulations
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’