Ministers considering move to bring back partial ‘green homes grant’
Ministers are considering boosting the Clean Heat Grant due to launch next April to encourage house holds and landlords to replace gas boilers and resurrect – in part – the failed Green Homes Grant.
The Clean Heat Grant will offer £4,000 as a one-off payment to help with the upfront cost of replacing a boiler.
One option is to increase the grant to incentivise people to buy heat pumps – which currently cost about £10,000 – in the next couple of years, reports The Telegraph.
“It could become more generous,” a government source said, adding that the criteria for the payment could also be widened to allow larger, non-domestic buildings to qualify.
Both options could cost tens of millions of pounds, meaning they would need sign off from the Treasury, which has capped the scheme at £100 million.
Green Homes Grant?
Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng (main pic) is very keen that something equivalent to the scrapped Green Homes Grant is brought back to encourage owner occupiers to take the steps to decarbonise their houses.
A final decision will be made and published in the heat and buildings strategy next month.
The government hopes to fit 5.5 million heat pumps in UK homes by 2030 with the aim of phasing out all gas boilers by 2035, while landlords have been tasked with raising the energy efficiency rating of all their properties to at least band C by 2028.
Its PRS consultation document reports that about 67% of rented properties are rated at less than EPC C, posing a risk to tenant health and leading to higher bills; those rented homes with an EPC C rating are also worth about 5% more than those currently at EPC D.
However, building expert Roger Bisby recently warned that plans to ditch gas boilers for heat pumps was a, “car crash coming in slow motion”. Bisby tells viewers on his Skill Builder channel that after getting a £4,000 government grant for a heat pump, you’d have to spend £16,000 to make it work.
Ben Beadle, Chief Executive of the National Residential Landlords Association, says: “We all want to see energy efficient rental homes. They cut bills for tenants, make homes more attractive to potential renters and help the country to achieve its net zero commitment.
“The Chancellor needs to develop a financial support package that works for landlords and tenants. This should especially be targeted at the hardest to treat properties where the cost of work will be prohibitive for landlords. In this way, he will also be doing the most to help the fuel poor.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Ministers considering move to bring back partial ‘green homes grant’ | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Ministers considering move to bring back partial ‘green homes grant’
Landlord wins battle with council over ‘unfair’ selective licensing fine
Common sense has broken out temporarily in the court system after a landlord successfully overturned a £2,500 fine for unknowingly letting her flat without a licence while she lived abroad.
Irene Ekweozoh began renting out the flat in Axon Place, Ilford (pictured) in 2007 when she moved to Canada but didn’t give Redbridge Council her new address, which means she did not know its new selective licensing scheme had been introduced in July 2017.
She only discovered the change in November 2018 and immediately sent in an application. However, in May 2019 she was fined for the six-month period the property had been rented without a licence.
Ekweozoh appealed against the decision which has now been overturned.
Fine scrapped
Judge Martin Rodger ruled that the fine should be scrapped, arguing that the landlord had committed an offence of “moderate seriousness” and should only be given a warning.
He added: “The basic facts of this case are that a landlord with a single property…was unaware of the need for a licence, having been absent from the country for ten years.
The appellant’s non-compliance with the licensing requirement did not therefore cause a significant risk (or any risk) to the occupants or to the public as a whole.
“This seems to me to be a case in which the appropriate disposal, in accordance with the respondent’s policy, is to deal with the matter informally.”
A Redbridge Council spokesman said it was disappointed with the outcome but accepted the judge’s findings. He added: “The scheme helps the council to protect the health and safety of private renters and improve the quality of privately rented homes in the borough.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Landlord wins battle with council over ‘unfair’ selective licensing fine | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Landlord wins battle with council over ‘unfair’ selective licensing fine
Yes minister, there’s already a ‘lifetime deposit’ to offer tenants
While the cost of renting continues to increase across the UK, the Government continues to grapple with the issue of making renting more accessible and secure, especially for the more vulnerable in our society.
The Renters Reform Bill, announced in the 2019 Queen’s Speech and reaffirmed by the Government in May 2021 will, amongst other initiatives, look to introduce the concept of a ‘lifetime deposit’ to try and deal with the end of tenancy ‘deposit overlap’, whereby many tenants must find a new deposit for a new tenancy before the old one is released by the landlord, agent or authorised deposit scheme.
Details are currently sparse as to what this ‘lifetime deposit’ will look like and what it means for landlords and renters, but the slowly growing deposit replacement market will surely be looking at these changes as a chance to capitalise on one of their core USPs; deposit replacements already deal with the end of tenancy overlap as no physical cash is involved.
While the debate in the UK rages as to whether deposit replacements are a good thing or not, elsewhere in the world deposit replacement products are already gaining traction.
In the US, companies such as Rhino have taken the rental market by storm with more than 1.2m renters now enjoying deposit free renting and the number is growing month on month.
Some states are now progressing plans to legislate for landlords to offer deposit replacements alongside cash deposits, or in some cases as the primary option.
Others are following suit. Leap have announced the launch of their services in Australia to assist the country’s rental community following the lifting of eviction moratoriums and a scarcity of affordable homes in highly populated cities.
In Germany, companies such as Ocyan and Kautionsfrei are well established and other European countries are starting to launch their own versions.
Common thread
The common thread to all these deposit replacement companies is their commitment to make deposit free renting look and feel the same as using a traditional deposit.
In other words, they provide the same protection and security to both landlords and tenants as they would get if they opted to use a traditional deposit.
Deposit caps differ from country to country, ranging from one month’s rent equivalent up to three months. If a tenant has to find a £1,000 cash deposit, then the deposit alternative provides £1,000 protection to the landlord. There is none of this ‘increased coverage’ that benefits the landlord but actually penalises the tenant who is paying for the product.
Another constituent feature of all the above-mentioned products is the ability to pay for the deposit replacement monthly rather than upfront, thereby providing an even more affordable option as well as mirroring the behaviours of monthly rental and utility bill payments.
This also means tenants only pay for the length of their stay, rather than a yearly or two-yearly product that may not suit the tenant’s needs.
Transparency
Product literature is transparent, making it explicit that the tenant is always liable for damages and missed rent/bill payments rather than terminology and soundbites that make the tenant think they are purchasing an insurance product that covers their responsibility to pay.
While the UK also has its fair splattering of deposit replacement schemes only one company, Ome, offers both a monthly payment model as well as capping the protection to the landlord at the same level that would be provided by a traditional deposit – i.e. five or six weeks depending on the annual rental amount.
Launched in 2020 and operated by Hamilton Fraser, the people behind the government authorised tenancy deposit protection scheme mydeposits and Client Money Protect, the mission is to offer real choice to the tenant while providing the same protection to the landlord as if they had taken a traditional deposit.
One decision
Eddie Hooker, CEO of Hamilton Fraser (pictured), comments: “Tenants should only have one decision to make when it comes to security deposits – do I pay a traditional deposit or do I opt for a deposit replacement product? They shouldn’t have to worry that a replacement product that they are paying for benefits the landlord more than if they paid a cash deposit.
“They should also feel comfortable that, should they owe the landlord for damages or unpaid bills at the end of the tenancy, the deposit replacement company will treat them fairly and deal with the dispute in the same way that a deposit protection scheme operates.
“They want to know that their provider has a deep knowledge of the private rented sector and dispute management. Ome deals with these challenges whilst offering a simple monthly payment model for the duration of the tenancy (starting from just £5 per month), and dispute repayment plans should there be monies owed at the end. This is all backed by a business that has been operating in the sector for more than 25 years.”
Landlord’s agreement
“Already the deposit replacement product of choice by some of the UK’s largest student rental businesses, Ome also offers the option for tenants to unlock their current deposit with the landlord’s agreement.
“This feature helps both the landlord and the tenant by dealing with some of the smaller rent arrear issues caused by the ongoing COVID pandemic and other short term employment gaps.
“And of course, because there is no physical cash deposit to pay, tenants have the complete freedom to move home without the fear of the ‘second deposit problem’ caused by traditional deposit protection.
“By looking further afield and learning from the behaviours and practices of other established rental markets, deposit replacements can evolve in the UK and become a real option for many of the UK’s renters.
“By choosing the right deposit replacement product, landlords in turn can rest assured that they continue to be afforded the same protection and support as if they took a cash deposit, but without the regulatory hassle that goes with it. A win-win for both landlords and tenants.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Yes minister, there’s already a ‘lifetime deposit’ to offer tenants | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Yes minister, there’s already a ‘lifetime deposit’ to offer tenants
Has regulation of the industry become too much for some landlords?
Post-COVID, the landscape for landlords and lettings business owners shows further regulation and tightening of the rules.
The latest likely squeeze on landlords comes from the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards, which are expected to require a minimum EPC band C certificate by 2030.
Also, the Renters’ Reform Bill is back on the agenda with the recent Queen’s Speech confirming the government’s intention to ‘enhance the rights of those who rent’.
This will include measures to be proposed in a White Paper due this autumn, with legislation to enter parliament soon after. This is expected to include:
- Abolishing Section 21 – so-called ‘no fault’ evictions – and improving security for tenants in the private rented sector, as well as strengthening repossession grounds for landlords under Section 8 when they have a valid cause.
- Proposals for a ‘lifetime’ tenancy deposit that eases the burden on tenants when moving from one rented property to the next.
- Reforms to drive improvements in rented accommodation. This includes well-targeted, effective enforcement that drives out criminal landlords. This could include a national landlord register and requiring all private landlords to belong to a redress scheme.
- A set of measures to hold “bad landlords” to account so they deliver safe and decent housing to tenants, without penalising good landlords.
- Improving and reforming the court possession process to make it quicker and easier for both landlords and tenants to access.
But overall, as landlording gets tougher, you may need to find new ways to manage two key tasks better than before:
- Manage tenants expectations by providing a service in line with government expectations, and even better.
- Reduce expenses by finding more cost-effective services and partners.
We regularly hear from landlords at our parent company All services 4u and one of the big questions is ‘how many more changes are there going to be and will they cut into my margins?’.
It’s a tough question to answer but in all probability, this is going to happen.
But there is one thing that we are sure of – landlords must find ways to protect themselves against these changes and do it in the most cost-effective manner possible.
And because our clients keep on asking us for help, we created the Total Asset Protection Plan. It’s a ‘one-stop shop’ that can handle all your maintenance headaches for a fixed cost per month.
Our plan takes that a step further. With TAP not only is your boiler covered, but also the electrics, locks and many other features of a property. What’s more, you will also have your Gas Safety certificate and EICR electrical check costs included.
For a monthly fee, all of your maintenance costs are covered and, given all of the legislation changes, and the fact that landlords are now treated as ‘service providers’, your life would be made much simpler. No more panicked calls from your tenants anymore, or tough conversations.
Let the maintenance professionals take care of these conversations and serve as the middle person between you and your tenants.
If you would like to learn more about how this works and how we can bring down landlords’ maintenance costs (depending on your number of units), please email accounts@allservices4u.co.uk and make your subject TAP LAUNCH OFFER and we will send you a voucher code for 10% off.
We will call to help you with the joining process. It is easy, hassle-free and comes with a guarantee.
This will give you even more satisfaction and shield you from the stresses that naturally come with being a London landlord.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Has regulation of the industry become too much for some landlords? | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Has regulation of the industry become too much for some landlords?
REVEALED: Landlords now risk fines totalling £55,000 after regulation surge
Successive governments’ attempts to clamp down on rogue operators within the PRS means errant landlords are now exposed to fines totalling £55,000 as well as unlimited Rent Repayment Orders and up to three years in jail under Right to Rent regulations, it has been revealed.
This extraordinary tally is highlighted by Paul Shamplina, Chief Commercial Officer at Hamilton Fraser, who wonders if many landlords have ever been shown the reality of failing to be compliant.
He also says many landlords’ views on property management might change if they were shown the full list of fines and penalties they face.
“While these are the most extreme cases, I think it presents a clear picture that there is more emphasis than ever on landlords to be professional and compliant – there is no margin for error,” he says.
“Self-management is more challenging now than I have ever known it to be in the 30 years I’ve been involved in the private rental sector.”
Rights awareness
Shamplina also warns that tenants are becoming increasingly aware of their rights, partly due to local and national government campaigns to raise awareness but also efforts by key housing campaigning groups to highlight rogue landlords in the media.
“I think it is disappointing, especially after all the hard work landlords and tenants have gone through over the past year to work collaboratively, that such narratives are used,” he says.
“It creates a divide that suggests landlords and letting agents have no interest in having well-informed customers and are therefore mistreating their tenants.”
Shamplina says there will always be a small number of landlords and letting agents who deliberately fail to provide tenants with adequate information, the vast majority take their responsibilities seriously.
Find out more about Shamplina’s landlord course on self management.
Read his full-length blog on the regulation and landlords.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – REVEALED: Landlords now risk fines totalling £55,000 after regulation surge | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: REVEALED: Landlords now risk fines totalling £55,000 after regulation surge
EXCLUSIVE: Controversial landlord reveals all over ‘commercial waste’ arrest
Multi-millionaire landlord Fergus Wilson has been arrested after clashing with a council worker over furniture removal outside one of his properties.
Wilson’s workmen were loading dissembled furniture into a van in Perryfield Street when the environmental health officer from Maidstone Council arrived.
An altercation ensued, the police were called and he was arrested on ‘suspicion of assault’. However, after being taken to the police station, he was released without charge due to a lack of evidence.
He tells LandlordZONE: “The officer concerned called me racist for referring to him as a ‘petty little Hitler’. I told him he had blue eyes, blond hair and was English just the same as myself.
“He said I had assaulted him. I am 73 years old in a few days but if I had punched him he would have been out cold.”
Disgruntled neighbour
Wilson believes a disgruntled neighbour reported the workmen and that there may have been confusion over whether they were actually his employees and legitimately on a job.
He explains that the disagreement arose over the definition of commercial waste.
“The house is being sold after the tenants had moved out and has a stairway with a bend in it where you can’t get up conventional furniture.
“The council seems to think that if the landlord dissembles flat pack furniture to remove it, such as a dining room table – in order to reassemble at another house – it is to be regarded as commercial waste. However, if you do not disassemble it, such as a settee, then it is not commercial waste.”
Wilson adds: “Maidstone has the most acute housing situation in Kent but I’m not surprised if they carry on like this.”
A Maidstone council spokesperson tells LandlordZONE: “Maidstone Borough Council can confirm that a vehicle was seized in Perryfield Street which was carrying materials that required a waste carrier’s licence. We are unable to comment further on the incident as it is currently being investigated by Kent Police.”
Read more about Fergus Wilson.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – EXCLUSIVE: Controversial landlord reveals all over ‘commercial waste’ arrest | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: EXCLUSIVE: Controversial landlord reveals all over ‘commercial waste’ arrest
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’