Landlords threaten council with Judicial Review over HMO Licensing Scheme
For once, well organised Landlords are threatening to take the council to the High Court over plans to expand a housing licensing scheme.
York Residential Landlords Association claim City of York Council’s proposals are “unlawful and irrational”.
The council’s legal team is considering a solicitor’s letter from the landlords’
The post Landlords threaten council with Judicial Review over HMO Licensing Scheme appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Landlords threaten council with Judicial Review over HMO Licensing Scheme
Unusual tenant matching service seeks landlords’ help
An unusual start-up business aimed at tenants who are over forty years old is seeking landlords with multi-occupancy properties.
CosyQuarters.co.uk has been established by 57-year-old Maggie Byrne to help older tenants find similar people to house share with.
She tells LandlordZONE that the biggest challenged faced by those over 40 who are looking to rent – often for the first time – following a divorce or other life changing event is that most house shares are aimed at 20- and 30-somethings, and that studio flats are both expensive and unstimulating.
“It all started when my son left home and I wanted to rent his room out to someone my age but really struggled to find anyone,” she says.
Byrne began researching the market and discovered that many landlords are wary of mixing age groups within house share properties.
“Those over 40 struggle to find co-living properties to rent or people of the same age to rent with and that was what prompted me to start my business to help people with shared interests and values,” she says.
Matching service
“It’s essentially a matching service for these people so that they can have a choice about who they live with and how they live their life.”
Initially kicking off the business on Facebook with a private group for like-minded tenants interested in co-living, Byrne has now launched a website too.
Byrne attended the Start-up School for Seniors to get her idea off the ground, an organisation that offers to help older entrepreneurs prepare and launch a business in under eight weeks.
She also says that, because larger groups of people renting a property will be considered an HMO household, she’s also exploring how they could club together to buy properties together instead.
Read more about HMO licensing.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Unusual tenant matching service seeks landlords’ help | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Unusual tenant matching service seeks landlords’ help
Property portal claims BTR is now ‘mainstream consumer choice’ among renters
A property portal has claimed that the build to rent (BTR) sector has reached a tipping point and that homes within this kind of development are now a ‘mainstream consumer market’ even though it still only represents less than 1% of the UK private rental market.
The claim has been made by website Love to Rent which has launched a week of promotional activity for BTR backed by the British Property Federation, the UK Apartment Association and leading providers including Allsop, Simple Life, Folio, and Fizzy Living (pictured, above).
“The key selling points of build to rent including great customer service, longer tenancies, on-site amenities and a sense of community are what set this type of living apart,” says Peter Sloane (left), Chair of Love to Rent.
Unreliable landlord
“Renting has never managed to shake off that image of a slightly unreliable private landlord, but we want to dispel those myths and show there is a different way to rent.
“The build to rent sector has been gathering momentum for years but now with over 50,000 units now occupied and record investment into the sector last year, we have reached a tipping point where it has become a mainstream consumer market.”
Commenting on behalf of the British Property Federation, Ian Fletcher says: “Renting is about people. It is about giving customers a great experience through inspiring and conscientious employees and good suppliers.
“The Build to Rent sector has happy customers. We know from customer feedback that people love their Build to Rent homes, the range of services they offer, sense of community, and great customer service. “With an ever-increasing number of homes being delivered for a variety of needs and budgets access to the Build to Rent has never been easier.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Property portal claims BTR is now ‘mainstream consumer choice’ among renters | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Property portal claims BTR is now ‘mainstream consumer choice’ among renters
Do you agree? New Shelter report hightlights national ‘housing emergency’
Shelter has condemned Britain’s housing system as unaffordable, unfit, unstable and discriminatory – a situation made worse by benefit cuts and the pandemic.
The charity’s new report, Denied the Right to a Safe Home, highlights a housing emergency, reveals gross inequality in the housing system and calls on the government to build at least 90,000 good quality social homes a year.
Shelter’s survey of 13,000 people found that 23% are living in homes with significant damp, mould and condensation, or homes that they can’t keep warm in winter, while 8% report regularly cutting back on essential items, such as food and heating, to pay their housing costs.
Another 8% fear losing or being asked to leave their current home – largely driven by private renters who live in the least secure housing.
The research found that race, disability, sexuality and socio-economic status are all barriers to a safe home. Black people are 70% more likely to be impacted by the housing emergency than white people and Asian people are 50% more likely.
Disability
Shelter says 54% of people with a significant disability don’t have a safe or secure home, compared with 30% of those without a disability.
Chief executive Polly Neate (main picture) says decades of neglect have left Britain’s housing system on its knees.
“Lives are being ruined by benefit cuts, blatant discrimination and the total failure to build social homes,” says Neate.
“Shelter believes a safe home is a human right, but the pain and desperation our frontline staff see every day shows this is still a long way off.
“We are fighting for everyone impacted by the housing emergency and as we emerge from the pandemic, we want the public and politicians to do the same.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Do you agree? New Shelter report hightlights national ‘housing emergency’ | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Do you agree? New Shelter report hightlights national ‘housing emergency’
Campaign group claims banning ‘unfair evictions’ will save councils £161m a year
Generation Rent has claimed that ending unfair evictions could reduce homelessness by nine percent and save councils £161 million a year.
By unfair evictions it means banning Section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions that follow a tenant complaining about a property or its maintenance, or when a landlord decides to sell a property in order to sell it or re-let it to new tenants at a higher price. Generation Rent says 68,430 households have faced homelessness in this way since April 2018.
Tenants can protect themselves from ‘revenge evictions’ over complaints by reporting the matter to the council both before and after a Section 21 notice is issued, but few do this.
Generation Rent says it wants revenge evictions banned and also make landlords who to sell up compensate their tenants for the cost of moving home.
Section 21 evictions are a hot political potato at the moment as landlords wait to hear when all kinds of Section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions will be banned via the government Autumn White Paper, and what they will be replaced with.
Government data
Generation Rent is basing its evictions claims on MHCLG data that shows out of 755,250 households made homeless or threatened with homelessness between April 2018 and December 2020, 140,950 had been in a private assured shorthold tenancy (19%).
Of these households, 68,430 had faced an unfair eviction – either following a complaint about disrepair or due to their landlord selling or re-letting the property (49% of private rented sector cases and 9% of the total).
Evictions specialist Paul Shamplina of Landlord Action says: “Further to these figures quoted by Generation Rent, our data from the courts shows that at the coal face the possession cases situation is not as severe as they are suggesting,” says Paul Shamplina.
“It is also up for debate what ‘unfair eviction’ means as many landlords use Section 21 notice evictions for good reasons including to remove tenants who have stopped paying their rent but who have not been affected by the pandemic.
“That is why when Section 21 is banned, there needs to be special measures put in place to ensure landlords with legitimate reasons for repossession have a way to achieve that.
“And remember that many of the landlords that the Landlord Action team speak to are often repossessing because they have had enough of the new rules and extra taxation and want to sell up.”
Generation Rent have also published a report recommending the tenancy reforms it would like to see in the White Paper ‘to end unfair evictions and give renters’ greater long-term security in their home’.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Campaign group claims banning ‘unfair evictions’ will save councils £161m a year | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Campaign group claims banning ‘unfair evictions’ will save councils £161m a year
Rubbish idea? Islington latest council to fine landlords for tenants’ recycling mistakes
A leading London council is set to approve a controversial new scheme that will fine HMO landlords when tenants put non-recyclable materials into communal bins.
If Islington Council gets the green light, landlords will have to fork out £47 each time that refuse collectors find “significant amounts of non-recyclable material” in the bin.
Currently, each time this happens, a separate refuse crew has to go back and empty the bins, with the council absorbing any extra costs.
Islington will first issue a section 46 notice to all landlords and managing agents of properties that use communal recycling bins, explaining which containers to use.
But if their bin is then found to be ‘contaminated’ they’ll have to pay the £47 charge.
If they refuse, the bin won’t be emptied and they’ll be invited to remove the rubbish themselves and the recycling bin will be emptied as normal on the next scheduled collection day. If this doesn’t happen, they’ll be served with a community protection notice.
The council says this plan will offset the additional cost of collection for which there is currently no budget and improve the quality of recycling collected.
Not the first
Islington is not the first council to take this type of action; among those who charge for the service are Cambridge City Council (£30), Wigan Council (£20), and Watford Council which charges up to £90.
In 2017, the government extended HMO licencing and as part of the measures promised to make landlords responsible for bins and the associated dumped rubbish, declaring: “Landlords will be held responsible for making sure the council’s rules on refuse and recycling are followed.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Rubbish idea? Islington latest council to fine landlords for tenants’ recycling mistakes | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Rubbish idea? Islington latest council to fine landlords for tenants’ recycling mistakes
Can I increase the rent?
It’s a sensitive time to be talking about increasing the rent, but the time will come when this question needs to be addressed
Most landlords have done their utmost to help their tenants through the pandemic crisis, when they can afford it, but as the crisis comes to an end, and it must inevitably do so in time, landlords will need to address this difficult question, if they are to keep their businesses viable.
It’s so easy to let this issue slip, to let the rent fall so far behind the true market value that any increase back to the correct level becomes so painful that tenants start looking around for a move.
Responsible landlords want to keep their tenants as long as possible, but this should not be at any cost; it makes sense to instigate a series of small increases to keep rents in-line with the market, than risk a confrontation over a big increase – tenants rarely appreciate the benefit they got from living on a below market rent for an extended period, when the big increase eventually comes.
It we are to believe the economic pundits, there’s a good chance that inflation will take off as we pull out of the crisis and the country gets back to full activity. So operating costs will begin to rise and as any accountant will tell you, income should be kept in-line with costs whenever possible.
How much can a landlord increase rent by?
Under an Assured Shorthold Tenancy there’s no legal constrain, it’s a matter of agreement between the parties but using the market as a guide is the obvious answer.
Ask too much and the tenant will start to look around, so it’s a good idea to start that look around first, yourself. Trying to ascertain comparable rents within the locality and pitch the rent slightly below that level is a good strategy which has stood the test of time. Shop around the agents and letting ads, you can even make a few explorative enquiries as a prospective tenant yourself, to gauge the market values locally.
With house prices at record levels, it’s unlikely that demand for renting will decline any time soon, so you can rest assured that tenants will need to rent regardless, but that’s no excuse for exploitative behaviour.
Ask a fair rent for the type of premises you are letting and you are likely to hang on to your tenants for longer. Remember, void periods and reletting costs – not to mention the risk involved with new unknown tenants – will bring down your average returns dramatically. It makes no sense to maximise rents at the expense of constant turnover.
Most Assured Shorthold Tenancies (ASTs), as the term implies, are quite short, so the issue of a rent increase with an existing tenant does not arise. It then becomes a less contentious process to set a new rent with a new tenancy.
However, some shorthold tenancies last for many years, and Covid may well increase tenancy lengths. There is no legal time limit when the tenancy becomes periodic, or the number of renewals that can be signed, so rent increases do become an issue when a new rent needs to be agreed in a long-term – landlords or their agents then need to become involved in processing a rent increase.
With all ASTs rents can only be increased after the initial fixed term has ended, unless:
1. A rent increase or formulae for increase has been agreed beforehand and stated in the agreement
2. The tenancy agreement contains a rent review clause.
3. The landlord and tenant come to a mutually agreed rent increase.
Most standard AST agreements have a rent increase clause setting out the procedure for rent increases, which by definition is then agreed at the start of the tenancy.
If the tenancy agreement is silent on the matter and the tenant objects to an increase, then, if the landlord still wishes to pursue the matter, he or she has recourse to a procedure laid down in the Housing Act 1988.
This procedure was originally intended for use with tenants on an Assured Tenancy (AT) but it can also be used for ASTs.
Assured Tenancies (ATs) give tenants security of tenure, meaning landlords cannot use the s21 eviction process and must therefore have a means of increasing the rent for tenancies, most of which last for a very long time. Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 makes this possible, after the initial fixed term has ended, by serving on the tenant a Section 13 Notice.
Safeguards
There are appeals safeguards for tenants in the process. The rent tribunal complaints procedure will review the cost of renting similar properties in the area and what the landlord could charge if a new tenant was renting the property. It’s important for landlords to try to negotiate and stay on good terms if you want a long-term arrangement with your tenant and try to avoid this.
Currently, until such time as the Section 21 process is abolished, and taking into account the current extended notice periods, landlords of AST’s with the fixed-term ending have an alternative method of increasing the rent: rather than going through the rather protracted process using s13(2), they can simply offer a new fixed-term tenancy at an increased rent, failing which the tenant gets notice that the landlord will be applying for a possession order.
It may seem harsh to resort to these tactics, but it’s a commercial reality – if your lettings business is to survive long-term, rents must be kept in-line with market rents and running costs.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Can I increase the rent? | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Can I increase the rent?
Continued imbalance of supply and demand is a concern
Propertymark’s latest Housing Market Report has indicated that a record 32% of properties sold for more than the original asking price. This smashes the previous record back in May 2014 of 19%.
Propertymark Chief Policy Advisor, Mark Hayward
The post Continued imbalance of supply and demand is a concern appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Continued imbalance of supply and demand is a concern
Right to see payslips if tenant in arrears?
An elderly family member has rented a property to a council tenant for 20 years plus. My relative hasn’t managed it well and is owed £8,000 in missed rent payments. As my relative is ‘slightly’ at fault (in my view)
The post Right to see payslips if tenant in arrears? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Right to see payslips if tenant in arrears?
Peers savage government’s ‘too timid’ Leasehold Reform Bill
The government’s Leasehold Reform Bill making its way through parliament was heavily criticised during its second reading in the Lords yesterday by peers unhappy about its weaknesses and unintended consequences, one describing it as ‘lipstick on a pig’.
The bill is designed principally to abolish escalating ground rents and the huge costs that they can create for leaseholders, so much so that a market for long-term residential leasehold investors has sprung up, such are the profits involved.
But the legislation, which will usher in the most significant changes to property tenure in 800 years, will only apply to new leaseholds once it becomes law, which is not expected until 2023, government minister Lord Greenhalgh (pictured) confirmed.
Baroness Pinnock highlighted how this would create a two-tier property market for leaseholder.
“The failure of the bill to deal with past abuses of ground rent and service charges will leave existing leaseholders in a worst position because it will create a housing market when new-builds with zero ground rent will be far more attractive than those with spiralling ground-rents,” she said.
“Who in their right mind is going to purchase a property with those extortionate additional costs?”.
Also, many peers tackled the government for being too timid in its reforms, which will enable the leasehold system to continue albeit reformed.
Others, including Lord Stummel, said its measures should be implemented now and not in 2023.
Many speakers said it was time to abolish leasehold entirely, arguing that freeholders and managing agents would always cook up new ways to get around the restrictions.
“Buildings should be run for the benefit of those living in them and not the freeholder,” said Baroness Andrew (pitured).
Former chancellor Lord Hammond (pictured, below) also picked up on a key problem with the bill – that its definition of ‘rent’ was too vague and would impact the wider market.
He pointed out that the definition of rent will prevent properties being rented out on medium-term or long-term leases including, most crucially, the build-to-rent developers and investors who often lease their properties to management companies.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Peers savage government’s ‘too timid’ Leasehold Reform Bill | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Peers savage government’s ‘too timid’ Leasehold Reform Bill
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’