Property portal claims BTR is now ‘mainstream consumer choice’ among renters
A property portal has claimed that the build to rent (BTR) sector has reached a tipping point and that homes within this kind of development are now a ‘mainstream consumer market’ even though it still only represents less than 1% of the UK private rental market.
The claim has been made by website Love to Rent which has launched a week of promotional activity for BTR backed by the British Property Federation, the UK Apartment Association and leading providers including Allsop, Simple Life, Folio, and Fizzy Living (pictured, above).
“The key selling points of build to rent including great customer service, longer tenancies, on-site amenities and a sense of community are what set this type of living apart,” says Peter Sloane (left), Chair of Love to Rent.
Unreliable landlord
“Renting has never managed to shake off that image of a slightly unreliable private landlord, but we want to dispel those myths and show there is a different way to rent.
“The build to rent sector has been gathering momentum for years but now with over 50,000 units now occupied and record investment into the sector last year, we have reached a tipping point where it has become a mainstream consumer market.”
Commenting on behalf of the British Property Federation, Ian Fletcher says: “Renting is about people. It is about giving customers a great experience through inspiring and conscientious employees and good suppliers.
“The Build to Rent sector has happy customers. We know from customer feedback that people love their Build to Rent homes, the range of services they offer, sense of community, and great customer service. “With an ever-increasing number of homes being delivered for a variety of needs and budgets access to the Build to Rent has never been easier.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Property portal claims BTR is now ‘mainstream consumer choice’ among renters | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Property portal claims BTR is now ‘mainstream consumer choice’ among renters
Do you agree? New Shelter report hightlights national ‘housing emergency’
Shelter has condemned Britain’s housing system as unaffordable, unfit, unstable and discriminatory – a situation made worse by benefit cuts and the pandemic.
The charity’s new report, Denied the Right to a Safe Home, highlights a housing emergency, reveals gross inequality in the housing system and calls on the government to build at least 90,000 good quality social homes a year.
Shelter’s survey of 13,000 people found that 23% are living in homes with significant damp, mould and condensation, or homes that they can’t keep warm in winter, while 8% report regularly cutting back on essential items, such as food and heating, to pay their housing costs.
Another 8% fear losing or being asked to leave their current home – largely driven by private renters who live in the least secure housing.
The research found that race, disability, sexuality and socio-economic status are all barriers to a safe home. Black people are 70% more likely to be impacted by the housing emergency than white people and Asian people are 50% more likely.
Disability
Shelter says 54% of people with a significant disability don’t have a safe or secure home, compared with 30% of those without a disability.
Chief executive Polly Neate (main picture) says decades of neglect have left Britain’s housing system on its knees.
“Lives are being ruined by benefit cuts, blatant discrimination and the total failure to build social homes,” says Neate.
“Shelter believes a safe home is a human right, but the pain and desperation our frontline staff see every day shows this is still a long way off.
“We are fighting for everyone impacted by the housing emergency and as we emerge from the pandemic, we want the public and politicians to do the same.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Do you agree? New Shelter report hightlights national ‘housing emergency’ | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Do you agree? New Shelter report hightlights national ‘housing emergency’
Campaign group claims banning ‘unfair evictions’ will save councils £161m a year
Generation Rent has claimed that ending unfair evictions could reduce homelessness by nine percent and save councils £161 million a year.
By unfair evictions it means banning Section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions that follow a tenant complaining about a property or its maintenance, or when a landlord decides to sell a property in order to sell it or re-let it to new tenants at a higher price. Generation Rent says 68,430 households have faced homelessness in this way since April 2018.
Tenants can protect themselves from ‘revenge evictions’ over complaints by reporting the matter to the council both before and after a Section 21 notice is issued, but few do this.
Generation Rent says it wants revenge evictions banned and also make landlords who to sell up compensate their tenants for the cost of moving home.
Section 21 evictions are a hot political potato at the moment as landlords wait to hear when all kinds of Section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions will be banned via the government Autumn White Paper, and what they will be replaced with.
Government data
Generation Rent is basing its evictions claims on MHCLG data that shows out of 755,250 households made homeless or threatened with homelessness between April 2018 and December 2020, 140,950 had been in a private assured shorthold tenancy (19%).
Of these households, 68,430 had faced an unfair eviction – either following a complaint about disrepair or due to their landlord selling or re-letting the property (49% of private rented sector cases and 9% of the total).
Evictions specialist Paul Shamplina of Landlord Action says: “Further to these figures quoted by Generation Rent, our data from the courts shows that at the coal face the possession cases situation is not as severe as they are suggesting,” says Paul Shamplina.
“It is also up for debate what ‘unfair eviction’ means as many landlords use Section 21 notice evictions for good reasons including to remove tenants who have stopped paying their rent but who have not been affected by the pandemic.
“That is why when Section 21 is banned, there needs to be special measures put in place to ensure landlords with legitimate reasons for repossession have a way to achieve that.
“And remember that many of the landlords that the Landlord Action team speak to are often repossessing because they have had enough of the new rules and extra taxation and want to sell up.”
Generation Rent have also published a report recommending the tenancy reforms it would like to see in the White Paper ‘to end unfair evictions and give renters’ greater long-term security in their home’.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Campaign group claims banning ‘unfair evictions’ will save councils £161m a year | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Campaign group claims banning ‘unfair evictions’ will save councils £161m a year
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’