Review of the system for testing safety of construction products
Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick has appointed two experts to lead an independent review of the system for testing construction products. Former government adviser and construction expert Paul Morrell OBE will be the chair of the independent panel, along with legal expert Anneliese Day QC.
The post Review of the system for testing safety of construction products appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Review of the system for testing safety of construction products
BREAKING: Home Office U-turns on completing retrospective Right-to-Rent checks
Landlords have been saved an epic admin task as they now won’t need to carry out retrospective Right to Rent checks on tenants who had a Covid-adjusted check between 30th March 2020 and 16th May 2021.
During the pandemic, landlords and letting agents have been able to check tenants’ ID documents using video calls.
Previous guidance had warned them they would need to go back and check again within eight weeks of the temporary measures ending on 17th May.
But the Home Office has now announced that this won’t be necessary when in-person Right to Rent checks return, explaining: “This reflects the length of time the adjusted checks have been in place and supports landlords during this difficult time.”
Agent lobbying
ARLA Propertymark had lobbied the government, saying tenants wouldn’t understand the need for repeating checks, leaving agents and landlords vulnerable to civil penalties if and when they needed to provide a statutory excuse.
For agents, repeating checks would have meant dealing with multiple visitors to their office, while some tenants wouldn’t have gone to the branch, leading to widespread non-compliance.
The revised guidance means they can maintain a defence against a civil penalty if a Covid-adjusted check was conducted, “in the prescribed manner or as set out in the COVID-19 adjusted checks guidance”, says the Home Office.
Timothy Douglas, ARLA Propertymark policy and campaigns manager (pictured), says: “We are very pleased that the Home Office has listened to our concerns about the practical barriers that would have made it impossible for letting agents in England to repeat the volume of adjusted checks carried out over the last year due to the pandemic.”
It now wants the sector to focus on getting to grips with the new system for all overseas nationals including those granted status under the EU Settlement Scheme.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – BREAKING: Home Office U-turns on completing retrospective Right-to-Rent checks | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: BREAKING: Home Office U-turns on completing retrospective Right-to-Rent checks
BREAKING: Trading Standards to consult on what property portal listings should include
National Trading Standards is to launch guidance that will ensure that portal listings include the minimum ‘material information’ when marketing properties on portals to tenants, and has launched a consultation ahead of the guidance being finalised.
As well as the basics, this also covers several contentious areas including the status of cladding on a building, under what conditions pets are allowed in a property and whether a landlords is prepared to accept tenants in receipt of benefits.
But overall NTS wants to help agents to meet their minimum legal requirements at the beginning of tenants’ and buyers’ property searches, the vast majority of whom use portals to kick off their house hunting.
Under current legislation, as set out in the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, estate agents and letting agents have a legal obligation not to omit material information from consumers on property listings.
But current practices around disclosure are not consistent across the industry, says NTS chief James Munro (pictured, above).
He heads up its specialist National Trading Standards Estate and Letting Agency Team which is developing guidance for agents to clarify what should be in portal listings.
He is encouraging estate and letting agents to share their thoughts about what constitutes material information in a new survey launched today but due to close on 17th May.
The survey covers a range of questions for agents about what should be defined as material information, including information on building safety, utilities and property tenure.
Research among home buyers and tenants reveals that 90% would prefer portal listings to include details property information, and that approximately half would be suspicious of, or less likely to buy or rent a property if key information is missing.
“It is essential for property agents to understand their obligations in terms of disclosure so this is why this guidance is so vital,” says Sean Hooker, Head of Redress at the PRS (pictured).
“The shop window for most agents are now the portals so they are the perfect place for consumer to gather the facts they need to help them make their decision about what is such an important matter – the roof over their head.
“The survey is your chance to help shape what will need to be part of this information pack available at the fingertips of your customers.”
Read more about property portals.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – BREAKING: Trading Standards to consult on what property portal listings should include | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: BREAKING: Trading Standards to consult on what property portal listings should include
Local Authority rent guarantees could unlock PRS to UC tenants
Rent guarantees and upfront cash payments from local authorities are most effective in opening up the private rented sector for people receiving benefits according to major new research from the Centre for Homelessness Impact, the Behavioural Insights Team and the National Residential Landlords Association.
The post Local Authority rent guarantees could unlock PRS to UC tenants appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Local Authority rent guarantees could unlock PRS to UC tenants
LATEST: Tenant demand soars in burbs as more renters quit inner city
A rise in demand for homes in commuter zones and well-connected towns is causing a mini-boom in the rental market, according to buy-to-let specialist Thirlmere Deacon.
The pandemic has left more renters looking for extra space, pushing rents up as they search outside of city centres. Rents outside the capital have soared by 8% in the past year, as a lack of available homes means half of landlords have increased their income.
However, London bucked this trend, with a double dip in rental prices in February after five months of continuous growth, with average rents in inner London falling 17% year-on-year, according to research from Hamptons estate agents.
This rise in rents of newly let property outside the capital is the highest since Hamptons started its index in 2012; rents grew in outer London by 5% and in the South East by 10%, as tenants sought out more rural areas and working from home space.
Tenant demand
Increasing tenant demand for commuter towns has also translated into changes in the average time to rent out houses and flats; according to Zoopla, as it now takes 30% less time to rent out a property than it did a year ago.
Thirlmere Deacon director Stuart Williams (pictured) says: “Investors who have been closely monitoring market movements will recognise that there’s been a shift in tenant preferences and an increased demand for properties located in commuter towns.”
The company reckons its new development – Library House Brentwood – is a good opportunity for anyone wanting a buy-to-let property in an established commuter location. This modern apartment block features secure bike storage for green commuters, additional storage facilities, daytime concierge and allocated parking spaces.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – LATEST: Tenant demand soars in burbs as more renters quit inner city | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: LATEST: Tenant demand soars in burbs as more renters quit inner city
ANALYSIS: Councils continuing to invest in risky commercial property
Some councils are continuing to invest in commercial property to boost their day-to-day income, despite warnings that these investments are risky.
One recent example is Somerset’s four district councils investing over £200 million between them in commercial property, in order to fund front-line services.
The trend has been in train for some time now as ultra-low interest rates have enabled councils to borrow to buy these investments very cheaply.
Consequently, local authorities across the UK have been buying-up income producing commercial property, planning to use the rental income to make up for reduced grant funding from central government.
The problem for many of these investments has been that Covid 19 has had a dramatic effect on this rental income, in some cases reducing it to zero as major retail chains have gone into administration.
Empty stores
There are examples of councils investing millions into large department stores that now lie empty, and far from producing an impressive income stream, they have now become a liability, with business rates, insurance and security costs all falling on the owner – the council and in turn, the local taxpayers.
In the Somerset case, the four councils have invested taxpayers’ money into a range of investments, ranging from offices and warehouses to housing projects and business parks.
Granted not all of these investments have or will turn sour, but nevertheless the councils have been warned by property professionals that they are entering an unfamiliar field, where even with the best skill, judgement and expertise, things can easily go wrong. These investments in commercial property, especially in the current business environment, are highly ‘risky’.
Below forecasts
The Taxpayers’ Alliance (TA) has been warning for some time that some of these investments in commercial property are delivering yields which are well below forecasts.
The latest analysis by the taxpayers’ campaigning group reveals a ‘mixed picture’ for investments made by councils across the UK, even before the pandemic.
The group’s study found that Leeds, Shropshire, Buckinghamshire, Surrey, Runnymede and Woking councils all reported that rental income was well below what they expected when the investments were made.
According to the TA, Spelthorne council was the only local authority it selected that reported all investments were returning income in line with forecasts.
Harry Fone, campaign manager at the TaxPayers’ Alliance, has said: “While it can see some success, including keeping council tax down, there are no guarantees with any investment and ultimately it’s ratepayers that will end up footing the bill for underperforming portfolios.”
Cllr Richard Watts, chair of the Local Government Association’s Resources Board, in response to the TA’s comments, has said: “When making investments, councils need to follow strict rules and assessments to ensure they invest wisely and manage the risk of their investments appropriately. Investments are not only made to try and plug funding shortfalls but also to help contribute to local economies.
“Councils continue to face significant extra cost pressures and huge income losses as a result of the pandemic. The Government’s commitment to fund a portion of lost income from fees and charges is a step in the right direction but does not cover full losses, nor does it extend to commercial income losses.”
It has been reported that in the Somerset case, between the four councils in the county, £202,427,000 has been invested in commercial property, to date. South West Taunton (SWT) Council in particular has intimated that it could invest significantly more in property over the coming 12 months, potentially outstripping each of its three neighbours.
Not all of these investments reside in the local area. Here’s a rundown of the council’s current investments provided by Wellington Weekly News:
- Wickes Extra, Birmingham – £9.81m
- Aztec West Business Park, Bristol (unspecified number of units) – £9.1m
- B&Q store, Ayr – £6.6m
- The Range, Halifax – £5.445m
- Mecca Bingo, Corporation Street, Taunton – £1.614m
- Roughmoor Enterprise Centre, Roughmoor Lane, Williton – £1.405m
- Blackdown Business Park, Scott’s Lane, Wellington (four units) – £1.308m
- The Arcade (formerly The Carousel or K’s), Warren Road, Minehead – £314,000
- Other investments (under £250,000 in value) – £1.577m
Martin Henwood, SWT Council’s corporate finance adviser has said: “We invest in a diverse investment property portfolio, both locally and nationally, with the intention of generating surplus income that will be spent on local public services delivered within the district.
“This is an essential response to significant reductions in government funding over recent years and further reductions expected in future, in order to meet our service delivery objectives and avoid service cuts.
“We plan to increase our investment by up to £100m by the end of 2021/22,” he confirmed.
Pic credit: Stephen Oldham | Flickr
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – ANALYSIS: Councils continuing to invest in risky commercial property | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: ANALYSIS: Councils continuing to invest in risky commercial property
LATEST: Landlord faces £455,000 bill after Court of Appeal decision
The Court of Appeal has overturned an earlier judgement by a crown court to reduce a landlord’s Proceeds of Crime Act confiscation order from £455,000 to just £270.
North London landlord Hamid Kamyab now faces having to repay the huge bill after a long wait.
The saga began in July 2007 when Kamyab bought a house on Llanvanor Road in Golders Green (pictured, above) for £612,500 to rent out as an investment property.
He contends the five-bedroom property was bought already converted into nine apartments but Barnet council disagreed and in 2010 served an enforcement notice requiring him to re-convert the property back to its original configuration.
Kamyab did not comply with the enforcement notice for three years and in February 2015 he was convicted of breaching planning regulations and fined £10,000 plus £10,000 legal costs.
Proceeds of crime
Barnet then brought a Proceeds of Crime Act confiscation order against Kamyab, arguing that he had benefitted from the property to the tune of £455,414.
But at the POCA hearing in December 2019 a judge reduced this to £270 ‘in error’ by misreading the original court summons served on Kamyab, the Court of Appeal has now said, and linking his decision incorrectly to a similar case in 2017.
Barnet then sought to appeal the original judge’s ruling, and this has now been allowed – a decision how the situation will be remedied will be taken at a later date.
Read more: What is the POCA 2002?
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – LATEST: Landlord faces £455,000 bill after Court of Appeal decision | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: LATEST: Landlord faces £455,000 bill after Court of Appeal decision
Worst choice on record for placing cash deposits
Moneyfacts UK Savings Trends Treasury Report data, not yet published, reveals that the number of deals available to savers has contracted to a record low, at a time when savers would hope to see a boom during ISA season. Average rates rest at record lows
The post Worst choice on record for placing cash deposits appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Worst choice on record for placing cash deposits
Double Tax Agreement on property sold in Cyprus?
I moved back to the UK 7 years ago from Cyprus. I have dual citizenship for both countries. I bought a flat in Cyprus in 2003 where I lived until 2013 when I moved to the UK and moved into my partner’s house until today 2021.
The post Double Tax Agreement on property sold in Cyprus? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Double Tax Agreement on property sold in Cyprus?
ADVICE: Robust referencing and regular visits vital amid cannabis farm boom
The recent story of a Nottinghamshire landlord who tipped off police when he couldn’t gain access to his property, but could smell cannabis, serves as the latest reminder to landlords to carry out a thorough tenant referencing check and make regular visits to their property.
In this case, the police arrested two men after discovering a cannabis farm in the rental property, where some 200 plants were being grown and the electricity had been bypassed.
Following a nationwide boom in the illegal cannabis industry over lockdown, police have been urging landlords to carry out regular checks on their properties.
Leicester police report closing down at least one cannabis set-up every week, while Nottinghamshire Police have seen a rise of 280 per cent in cannabis plant seizures during lockdown compared to the same period last year.
And nationally, police say that more than 90 per cent of cannabis farms are set up in residential properties. Rented properties, the police warn landlords, are particularly attractive due to the lack of paper trail, which means that they can’t so easily be connected to the gangs running the operations.
Steve Barnes, Associate Director at Hamilton Fraser Total Landlord Insurance, explains how landlords can make sure they are protected should they discover their rental property has been turned into a cannabis farm.
“Firstly, landlords should check that their policy covers malicious damage, as many don’t. Our premier policy offers protection against malicious damage by tenants and their guests, as well as loss of rent resulting from the need to carry out repairs. But for a claim to be successful, you’ll need to provide evidence that you did all you could to prevent the damage from happening in the first place.
Although carrying out regular visits and thorough referencing checks may be a bit more complicated in a pandemic, these figures highlight how important they are. If anything goes wrong, to make a successful claim you’ll need to be able to show that your tenant passed a full and robust four-point reference check and that you carried out regular inspections.
Our updated guide to tenant referencing contains all the information you need to know about referencing and what a four-point check involves.”
The police have appealed to landlords who suspect foul play to look in on their homes, at least from the outside, every three months, as this is about the time it takes for a cannabis plant to provide a yield.
The tell-tale signs of a cannabis farm include a strong smell of cannabis, blacked out windows, excessive condensation, powerful lights, fluctuations in electricity bill and birds gathering on the roof as it is warmer than others in the street.
Find out more about the signs to look out for and the steps you can take to minimise your risk in Hamilton Fraser Total Landlord Insurance’s guide, The growing threat of cannabis cultivation for landlords.
Cannabis farms pose a real threat to landlords today – not only is the production and distribution of drugs often linked to more serious organised criminal activity related to drug dealing networks, as well as violence. But cannabis farms cause enormous damage to a property.
Cannabis can be extremely dangerous due to the fire risk, especially if people are living in adjoining properties. Hamilton Fraser Total Landlord Insurance has seen a rise in cannabis farms, in particular those that cause major fires within properties due to the rewiring of electrics and overloading of sockets from heat lamps.
Case study
“The landlord had been trying to contact the tenants to collect rent for the forthcoming month but was not receiving any reply. So they decided to drive past the property and saw the police removing bags of material from the flats,” says Melissa Choules (pictured), Senior Claims Technician at Hamilton Fraser Total Landlord Insurance.
“The police officers explained that the property was being used as a cannabis factory and made the property secure while they carried out their investigations.
“The tenants had caused extensive damage where they had used the bedrooms to grow cannabis. They had knocked down walls and made holes in the ceilings, rewired the electrics and reinstalled the plumbing systems. In this case, the landlord had completed full tenant reference checks and carried out regular property inspections.
“Because they had done everything they could to prevent this from happening and were able to provide evidence, the insurers paid out £25,000 for the buildings damage and £350 for loss of rent.”
The coronavirus pandemic may have made it more difficult to carry out referencing checks and property visits, but it has also caused a nationwide boom in cannabis farms. Landlords need to be aware of this and do all they can to minimise risks by making sure they have adequate landlord insurance, are carrying out robust referencing and regular visits to their rental properties.
As a valued LandlordZONE reader you’re entitled to 20% off Hamilton Fraser Total Landlord Insurance’s policies, call the team today on 0800 63 43 880 quoting code LZ2021 or get a quote online in under 4 minutes.
Pic Credit: Cannabis Urlaub via Flickr.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – ADVICE: Robust referencing and regular visits vital amid cannabis farm boom | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: ADVICE: Robust referencing and regular visits vital amid cannabis farm boom
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,864)
Archives
- November 2024 (55)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Why Southwark Council’s Attack on Letting Agents Is Misguided
- Why the Buy-to-Let Dream is Dead: How the Government Killed the UK’s Best Investment
- NRLA blast Housing Minister’s court system remarks
- Why Do You Really Want to Invest in Property?
- Demand for accessible rental homes surges – LRG