Boom in number of over 55s within rental population since 2010, reveals Paragon
An increase in later-life divorces, poorer pension returns and men living longer have all led to a boom in older renters, nearly half of whom live alone.
The over 55s now make up 16% of privately rented households in England (576,000), up from 11% in 2010, according to a survey of 2,000 tenants by Paragon Bank.
Its new report – The Growth of Later Life Tenants – found this age group are much more likely to live alone – 48% compared with 23% of under 55s – while they also tend to live in the property for longer and are much more likely to be men, accounting for 62% of tenants.
Special requirements
It believes that as population forecasts show a big jump in older people, landlords need to be prepared to cater for their requirements.
Managing director of mortgages, Richard Rowntree (left), says this could include allowing older tenants to make amendments to the property such as decorating or being more flexible about allowing pets, as 36% of dog owners are over 55.
He adds: “Landlords will need to consider longer tenancy agreements, the location of their property and any adjustments the property may need for later life tenants.”
Paragon’s research also reveals that older tenants are generally happier in private rented accommodation than other age groups; 68% of over 55s said renting suited their needs or they enjoyed renting, compared with 49% in the under 55 group, while 63% were pleased they didn’t have to worry about repairs.
However, it seems that it’s often circumstances that determines their choice as when asked about the reasons for renting, 39% said they didn’t have a mortgage deposit.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Boom in number of over 55s within rental population since 2010, reveals Paragon | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Boom in number of over 55s within rental population since 2010, reveals Paragon
Danny Butcher Foundation supporter raises funds and calls for regulation of ‘wealth creation’ gurus
A former model turned property developer has taken on a gruelling body transformation challenge to raise money for the Danny Butcher Foundation.
Ed Akay, director at Devon-based property development company Gold Lake Developments, is dieting and working out to get his body fat ratio down to 10%.
Ed, who hosts the Torbay Property Meet, is confident that he can recreate the physique he had when he modelled in his twenties and hopes to smash his £200 target by mid-December.
Danny Butcher committed suicide in 2019 after he became depressed while trying to clear his debts run up on a £13,000 Property Investors course.
The foundation was set up in his name to raise money for homeless people, mental health charities and military veterans – all favourite causes of the former soldier, who Ed believes was a hero, prepared to die for his country.
Long overdue
He tells LandlordZONE: “Danny’s suicide was both tragic and heart-breaking. I hope that the foundation celebrates his life by helping the causes that Danny believed in.
“I also hope that one of Danny’s long-term legacies will be the regulation of the ‘wealth creation’ industry – something that is long overdue.”
Danny’s family started an online petition calling for regulation of the wider property training sector, while other disgruntled property training course attendees are gearing up to bring a group action against Samuel Leeds. Danny’s sister Carrie adds:
“We are so grateful to Ed for helping us raise money for the Danny Butcher foundation. Ed and many others have been a great source of support this past year and this is a great tribute in Danny’s name.”
To donate to Ed: https://www.facebook.com/donate/3610620125650663/10223114950279379/
Read more about Danny Butcher.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Danny Butcher Foundation supporter raises funds and calls for regulation of ‘wealth creation’ gurus | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Danny Butcher Foundation supporter raises funds and calls for regulation of ‘wealth creation’ gurus
Residential and commercial landlord giant reveals surprising arrears results
Midlands-based Real Estate Investors (REI) has delivered an upbeat trading update, reporting that more of its residential and commercial tenants are now paying rent.
The real estate investment trust, which has a large property portfolio across all sectors, says it’s also confident of recovering outstanding rents, or at least being able to reach an agreed solution with those tenants who still need to pay up.
REI’s rent collection for the March quarter is now 93%, up from 90% in September and 81% collected in June.
Meanwhile, June quarter rent collection has risen to 90%, up from 86% in September and 81% in July.
September quarter (September to December) rent collection is already 89.92% and REI is confident that it will get unpaid rents from tenants as they resume normal trading.
But it adds that several its tenants who are able to pay are still taking full advantage of Government restrictions on landlords and refusing to, although some of them have now agreed settlement arrangements.
Better trading conditions have boosted the fortunes of REI’s retail tenants while its office portfolio, which is almost entirely out of town, has benefited from the trend for companies looking for safe and convenient workplaces for their employees where they don’t have to use public transport or make city centre commutes.
Chief executive Paul Bassi (pictured, above) says operating a diversified portfolio has helped create robust levels of occupancy – 93% across the portfolio – and prompted rent collection.
He says: “We also remain confident that occupier demand for our assets will continue and we are mindful that the current environment may create opportunistic sales and acquisitions for the group.”
Read Tom Entwistle’s guide to quarter days.
Guide: How to deal with rent arrears.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Residential and commercial landlord giant reveals surprising arrears results | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Residential and commercial landlord giant reveals surprising arrears results
Legal Issues: Frustration of Contract
What is frustration in relation to Contracts?
Frustration occurs when an unforeseen event occurs after a contract is agreed between the parties and entered into. Subsequently an unforeseen event, one which is not incorporated into the contract, and one which is outside the control of the parties, makes the contract either: physically or commercially impossible to perform or continue with.
It would not be enough that performance is made more costly or more difficult, the frustrating event or change in circumstance needs to be so fundamental to the agreement and completely beyond what was contemplated by the parties when they entered into the contract.
However, frustration of a contract under English law can be difficult to establish. If it can be established then one of the parties is able to walk away from the contract with no further ties, but complications arise when the contract contains a force majeure clause. This clause however must be specific and relevant to the particular ‘event’.
Before considering a challenge, a party to a contract should read the small print to determine if:
- there is a force majeure clause which covers the event
- if there is no force majeure clause, whether the event was truly unforeseeable
- if the event made the obligation to perform impossible, illegal or radically different
- If it would be impossible to continue under re-negotiated terms.
Any court, when considering a challenge of frustration, will consider the specific contract terms, the full background facts, the status and abilities of the parties and their ability to perform the contract in light of the event changes.
It is difficult to define what is truly unforeseeable, for example in the case of the Covid pandemic it might be argued that such an even would be foreseeable, but what may truly frustrate a contract could be the actions of government, bringing far-reaching restrictions which would render proceeding illegal.
Where money has been paid or pre-paid the 1943 Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act allows for the recovery of sums under contracts when in can be shown that it has been frustrated.
Example Case
An example of a frustration case, one which failed,would be Gold Group Properties Limited v BDW Trading Limited (formerly known as Barratt Homes Limited) (2010)
In this case a dispute arose between the parties because of a change in the circumstances relating to an agreement for a substantial residential development where the properties were to be sold, on long leases.
Gold Group Properties, the claimant, was the freeholder and the defendant Barratt’s was to build out the development, sharing the sales revenue.
However, with a sharp fall in the property market it transpired that the minimum sale prices that had been agreed in the contract were no longer attainable. Barratt refused to begin the building works.
Gold Group applied to the court for summary judgment to be entered in their favour for damages, due to Barratt’s refusal to commence the building works.
In its defence, Barratt argued that the agreed minimum sale prices operated as conditions to the contract and therefore they were not obliged to start works and the contract was frustrated. Gold Group argued that the minimum sale prices were only included to guarantee Gold’s recovery on sales, not to protect Barratt, and that Barratt’s failure to develop the property amounted to breach of contract.
Did the sharp fall in projected sale proceeds frustrate the contract? That was the issue the judge had to decide.
The judge Coulson LJ found that the contract was not frustrated. First off, the change in the economic climate did not constitute an unforeseen event. The contract had been drafted with the risk of a possible fall in the market in mind. It provided a sufficient mechanism for the minimum
sale prices to be renegotiated or determined by an expert in the absence of agreement between the parties.
The decision in this case shows that the court will not allow claims to succeed based on frustration due to changes in economic conditions alone. The minimum prices scheduled were held not to be a condition precedent to the carrying out by Barratt of the building works themselves.
There was no express term to that effect anywhere in the contract. The possibility that prices would drop was within the anticipation of the parties, and not having made provision for it, they undertook the associated commercial risk.
Conclusion
The parties to a contact, whether consciously or not, accept there is a risk from future events. Where a contract is frustrated one party would be better off walking away from their obligations, whereas the other would be worse off if the deal is not made legally binding by the contract.
To achieve judgement, it is not just an unforeseen event that qualifies to frustrate a contract; a change of circumstances must be so dramatic that the new circumstances must be completely outside of the contemplation of the parties at the time the contract was made.
To achieve a just and equitable result between the parties “frustration” recognises that events, significant changes in circumstances, can and do interfere with contractual performance, warranting the cancellation of a contract.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Legal Issues: Frustration of Contract | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Legal Issues: Frustration of Contract
Any conveyancer accepting electronic signatures?
Does anyone know of a 21st century conveyancer who will accept electronic signatures & ID?
We have an inter-family sale agreed but one member of the family lives aboard which is delaying the process as it takes 4 weeks for post to arrive
The post Any conveyancer accepting electronic signatures? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Any conveyancer accepting electronic signatures?
Retiree and ‘Mature’ renters fastest growing tenant segment of PRS
Retiree renters and those in upper-middle age category are the fastest growing tenant groups in the private rented sector (PRS), analysis from Paragon Bank has found.
Paragon’s new report ‘The Growth of Later Life Tenants’, released today, showed that the number of English households in the 55-64 year old age category in the PRS with an Assured Tenancy has risen by 118% since the turn of the last decade
The post Retiree and ‘Mature’ renters fastest growing tenant segment of PRS appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Retiree and ‘Mature’ renters fastest growing tenant segment of PRS
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’