The Government has pledged its commitment to lifetime rental deposits in a new document that vows to improve the housing market.
Plans to introduce a new lifetime
tenancy deposit are outlined in Planning
for the Future with a pledge to support good landlords who can, “continue
to provide the homes the country needs”. It adds: “Ensuring renters are treated
fairly through the Renters’ Reform Bill – we will improve security for tenants
by abolishing the use of ‘no fault evictions’ so that tenants can put down
roots in their communities and plan for their long-term future.”
The Ministry of Housing,
Communities & Local Government document says it wants to deliver a rental
system that is fit for the modern day – one that protects tenants and supports
landlords. This will start with a planning white paper in the spring to
modernise the planning system.
Although there are no details yet on how it would work, ARLA Propertymark says a lifetime deposit is likely to be welcomed by both tenants and landlords, while The Residential Landlords Association has long called for such a change, arguing: “It would be easier for all involved if a tenant’s deposit could follow them from property to property, with the tenant making up any shortfall caused by deductions.” ARLA believes that under the proposed system, a tenant’s deposit would follow them around from property to property, with the tenant liable to make up any shortcomings as a result of deductions.
One potential downside is how quickly any possible shortfall could be made up without affecting either the outgoing or incoming landlord – something the Tenancy Deposit Protection Reform Working Group was set up to explore.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – The Government has pledged its commitment to lifetime rental deposits in a new document that vows to improve the housing market. | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: The Government has pledged its commitment to lifetime rental deposits in a new document that vows to improve the housing market.
Fraudulent London landlord jailed for forgery
A rogue landlord jailed for forging documents to prevent enforcement action being taken over his three illegally converted HMOs has been ordered to pay £55,000.
Siddarth
Mahajan of Milton Crescent, Ilford was convicted under the Proceeds of Crime
Act at Snaresbrook Crown Court during a confiscation hearing where Barking and
Dagenham Council recovered £30,000. The judge also ordered him to pay £25,000
in costs.
Mahajan was
sentenced in February 2019 for converting a three-bedroom family
home in Sherwood Gardens, Barking, into an HMO without planning permission. He’d
bought the property in 2015 but falsely claimed it had been in use as an HMO for more
than 10 years and was therefore immune from enforcement action. He produced a
number of documents to support this claim including several tenancy agreements,
a letter from an estate agent and a sworn affidavit which appeared to show that
it had been an HMO since 2008.
The Special Investigations Team examined other
properties owned by Mahajan in St Erkenwald Road and Ripple Road, Barking. He
had also converted these family homes into HMOs without securing planning
permission, and provided similar forged documents. Mahajan was found guilty of
two counts of perverting the course of justice and three counts of using copies
of forged documents, and sentenced to eight months for each offence, to run
concurrently.
Councillor
Margaret Mullane, cabinet member for enforcement and community safety, says: “I
hope this serves as a stark warning to disreputable landlords that we will
continue to come after them for their money even if they have been previously
prosecuted.
“The council will not stand by and let our residents
live in cramped properties that are harmful to their wellbeing.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Fraudulent London landlord jailed for forgery | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Fraudulent London landlord jailed for forgery
Right to Rent checks raise Coronavirus fears among lettings agents
Worried letting agents are calling on the Government to issue advice about how to conduct Right to Rent checks without putting themselves and their tenants at risk.
ARLA Propertymark has written to the
Secretary of State for Health, Matt Hancock, asking for guidance, stressing just
how much social interaction is needed for letting agents to do their jobs. Chief Executive David Cox writes that
by law, letting agents must carry out face-to-face Right to Rent checks in the
presence of all adult occupiers, but many agents are concerned about their
ability to do their work in light of the Coronavirus.
“The virus poses more of a problem when tenants are
self-isolating and there are issues at the property that need to be resolved or
at the start and end of the tenancy process with interaction between multiple
parties,” says Cox.
He adds: “Given the importance of housing and the ability
for people to buy and sell property as well as rent, we implore the Government
to provide urgent advice to the sector to ensure that their businesses can
continue to operate.”
The Residential Landlords Association’s policy manager
John Stewart suggests that if landlords have a property inspection scheduled, they
should consider whether it can be delayed until later in the year. If it
can’t, or they’re checking a tenant in or out, he says they should follow official
advice. “While you don’t want to be unnecessarily intrusive, it may be
worth asking tenants if they have travelled from higher risk areas or are
showing symptoms.”
“If your properties are managed,” adds Stewart, “then
ask what steps your agent is taking to inform tenants, and if they have
contingency plans in place should a tenant have to self-isolate.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Right to Rent checks raise Coronavirus fears among lettings agents | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Right to Rent checks raise Coronavirus fears among lettings agents
Breaking: Council bids to host England’s first Housing Court
Portsmouth council and its local landlords’ association believe everyone involved in the private rental market would benefit from the proposal.
Portsmouth council has become the first in the
UK to apply to run its own local Housing Court, ahead of a government decision
to set up a national system.
Ministers finished consulting on a separate Housing
Court system in January and an announcement is expected soon. Both lettings
agency and landlord
industry associations as well as housing
charities have been lobbying hard for it to be introduced.
Disputes in England are currently heard either
in a County Court or a First Tier Tribunal but
the government has said it is aware that many tenants, and landlords, find
these processes daunting and expensive.
Portsmouth is therefore proposing to ask
Ministers for permission and funding to set up its own local Housing Court
which, if successful, would make it the first to do so.
Local landlords are behind the plan. Alwin
Oliver, vice chairman of the Portsmouth and
District Private Landlords Association (PDPLA) told a meeting of the council that: “’We would ask firstly for a
mediation service to try to settle things. But it could lead to a specialist
division of the county court dealing just with housing.
“We think if there’s a good system
that a landlord or tenant can go and say ‘I have got a problem’ and a mediator
can help that would be better. It can take months for things to happen in
county courts.”
Oliver also said his organisation
would help the council lobby for funds from the ministry.
The meeting also revealed that the
council has other plans up its sleeve including proposals to loan tenants cash
to pay for deposits, lend landlords funds to do up properties, launch a website
listing accredited landlords and widening its HMO licensing scheme.
But
the meeting also heard arguments from one councillor against introducing a
selective licensing scheme within the city, local media
reported.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Breaking: Council bids to host England’s first Housing Court | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Breaking: Council bids to host England’s first Housing Court
BTL max age now 99 for Gatehouse bank
Gatehouse Bank has relaxed its age criteria for Buy to Let mortgages increasing the maximum age at the end of the term, from 85 to 99 years. The 99 year age only applies to borrowers relying solely on rental income to stress test for affordability.
The post BTL max age now 99 for Gatehouse bank appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: BTL max age now 99 for Gatehouse bank
Exclusive: landlords warned over new WhatsApp business usage rules
Landlords who use WhatsApp to communicate with tenants are exposing themselves to legal action from the global communications giant, which is owned by Facebook and in the UK is the most popular way to text friends and family.
The free-to-use service has quietly ushered in new terms that mean businesses including landlords and letting agents cannot use its service to communicate with customers and must instead use a separate business version.
After talking to several landlords who wished to remain anonymous, it is clear that the use of WhatsApp is widespread within the private rented sector as a means to both on-board tenants and manage property and tenancies.
Landlords are also not being compliant with GDPR data protection and privacy laws when using the free personal version of WhatsApp for business purposes, according to consultancy Stitch.ai.
Late last year WhatsApp updated its terms to say that: “In addition, beginning on December 7, 2019, WhatsApp will take legal action against those […] that violate our Terms of Service, such as […] non-personal use, even if that determination is based on information solely available to us off our platform.”
WhatsApp expert Paul Gandar from consultancy Stitch says: “Having client messages on Personal WhatsApp Accounts – using a work phone doesn’t cut it – is something that you need to avoid if you want to maintain a client relationship over WhatsApp.”
Under the radar
He says smaller landlords with a few properties and only intermittent communications with tenants are, although technically breaking the new rules, likely to remain under the radar.
But other landlords with larger portfolios who run their own businesses whether through a limited company or not, are exposed.
There are two solutions. Either to sign-up to use the separate WhatsApp Business app or use a paid-for third-party managed service that directly plugs into WhatsApp.
“For the free version, we would point out to any business that they need to ensure they adhere to the correct naming policy, as well as WhatsApp Business Policy,” says Gandar.
“If
you need to manage your messages within a team, then a supplier such as Stitch will manage the Display
Name Policy, and Business Engagement policy on your behalf.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Exclusive: landlords warned over new WhatsApp business usage rules | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Exclusive: landlords warned over new WhatsApp business usage rules
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’