Investing in Venture Capital Trusts to remove my CGT liability?
I have just sold a rental property and will be liable for Capital Gains Tax after taking in to account the various tax breaks.
I understand the rate payable will be 18% or 28% depending on my other total income.
The post Investing in Venture Capital Trusts to remove my CGT liability? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Investing in Venture Capital Trusts to remove my CGT liability?
RLA writes to Ministry of Housing over electrical safety loophole
New regulations raise the prospect of the highest risk rental properties not being covered by a legally binding electrical safety regime for a prolonged period of time.
The changes, due to come into force from June this year
The post RLA writes to Ministry of Housing over electrical safety loophole appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: RLA writes to Ministry of Housing over electrical safety loophole
Electrical safety rules will leave tenants at risk
New electrical safety rules could leave tenants in high-risk rental homes vulnerable. The regulations are due to come into force from June this year and will immediately remove the obligation for landlords to carry out electrical safety checks in Houses of Multiple Occupation (HMOs). The electrical safety obligation under the new rules will not apply until […]
The post Electrical safety rules will leave tenants at risk appeared first on RLA Campaigns and News Centre.
View Full Article: Electrical safety rules will leave tenants at risk
Break Clauses in Commercial Leases
Lease Agreements:
Landlords of
residential properties have become used to the “rules of the game”
being largely governed by statute, that is laws laid down by
Parliament. They govern the relationship between landlord and tenant
much to the exclusion of express custom clauses drawn up by the
landlord and set-out in the tenancy agreement.
Many of the clauses in residential agreements are pretty standard, indeed the government now provides a model tenancy agreement that all landlords can use free of charge. It has clauses that reflect the Housing Acts, even when not expressly included, as some rules are implied. Yes, there is some flexibility whereby landlords can include their own rules by way of custom clauses, but they can only be enforced if a court deems them “reasonable.”
However, with a commercial lease things are somewhat different. Yes, there are some over-riding common law and statutory principles that lease clauses must adhere to, but in the main the agreement is based on contract law whereby the parties make and agree their own rules. It contrasts somewhat with the consumer law influence now attached to a residential tenancy.
This article is based on English law and is not a definitive statement or interpretation of the law; rules change and every case is different – only a court can decide. Other jurisdictions are similar but there are important differences. Always seek expert advice before making or not making decision.
A case that illustrates this point very well involved a dispute between commercial tenant Marks & Spencer and landlord BNP Paribas (Marks and Spencer pic v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd), a case which in 2015 ended up at the Supreme Court, having previously gone through the Court of Appeal.
M&S had rented
retail space off the landlord on a lease which included a conditional
tenant’s only break clause. The conditions to exercise the break
were that (1) six months’ notice was to be given, (2) a break
premium was to be paid, and (3) there were to be no rent arrears at
the time the break notice was served.
The dispute between
the parties arose because the break itself was out of sync with a
quarter’s rent paid in advance, which meant two months’ rent was
paid for a period after the tenant had gone.
In all the respects
the conditions of the break were met in full, the six month’s
notice served, the break premium of £919,800 + VAT paid, and there
were no rent arrears, indeed the converse was true – rent was
overpaid.
The difficulty for
the tenant was that there was no express clause in the lease either
stating what would happen in the case of a rent overpayment, and
nothing to align the break with the end of a quarter, but the tenant
wanted the overpaid rent to be returned.
The initial court
case involved a claim for the “overpaid” rent on the basis that
the court should imply such a term in the lease; after all, on the
face of it logic would seem to imply that any overpayment should be
refunded.
The Court found in
favour of M&S, and as the tenant requested, implied a repayment
clause even though no express clause existed. BNP Paribas appealed
the decision and it was overturned by the Court of Appeal. M&S
then pursued the matter through to the Supreme Court, the final
arbiter, and lost its case, and its refund.
What are the
lessons for property investors?
The main principle
to remember is that business leases are basically contractual
agreements based on negotiations between the parties and the courts
will enforce them as such. Courts do not like to imply terms in
commercial leases unless there are exceptional circumstances.
In giving judgement,
the Supreme Court stated that “a term will only be implied if it
satisfies the test of business necessity or is so obvious that it
goes without saying.” It was determined by the Supreme Court
that the absence of a repayment clause in the lease was not a
“business necessity” or a “practical absurdity”
and accordingly it ruled that a repayment clause should not be
implied by the Court. These were matters that should have been dealt
with by the parties when negotiating the contract according, to the
judges.
The ruling is an
important one because it lends a good degree of certainty for
commercial landlords regarding the position of the parties regarding
the repayment of rent following a break. The Court was concerned that
if had it found in favour of the tenant in this case, then numerous
further disputes might arise alone similar lines where matters were
not expressly dealt with in the lease.
On the face of it
the decision could be construed as overly “landlord friendly” and
against logic; a harsh decision on the tenant when it had paid for a
period it was unable to use. This was the case even though it had
paid a substantial break premium. But it was stymied simply because
the date of the break did not align with a quarter day and there was
no specific repayment clause.
However, the Court
took into consideration that a tenant-only break clause was
potentially of considerable commercial value to the tenant, and
therefore deemed it fair that the landlord should not be obliged to
repay the two-months’ rent when it was the tenant’s decision to
break the lease.
This Supreme Court decision stands and it is an important principle for property investors and for assignees to bear in mind; that whatever the lease says binds the parties, and usually what it does not say, doesn’t. It’s important to check lease break clauses carefully when purchasing a commercial building with an existing tenant, or taking on an existing lease.
Break Clauses in Residential & Commercial Leases
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Break Clauses in Commercial Leases | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Break Clauses in Commercial Leases
Nottingham Council won’t refund my licensing fee
The Nottingham Selective Licensing Fee is £780.00 for 5 years. I paid £460 in October 2018 and was due to pay the final £320.00 in 2021, but after 15 months I sold my property (tenant in huge arrears, UC messed up payments).
The post Nottingham Council won’t refund my licensing fee appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Nottingham Council won’t refund my licensing fee
Fitness for Human Habitation Act extension-one month to go
On 20th March 2020 the Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act will be extended to apply to existing tenancies in England. The law was introduced in March last year, to ensure rented homes are safe and secure-with tenants given the power to take their landlord to court if this is not the case. Tenants who […]
The post Fitness for Human Habitation Act extension-one month to go appeared first on RLA Campaigns and News Centre.
View Full Article: Fitness for Human Habitation Act extension-one month to go
Breaking: UK’s biggest estate agency companies in talks to merge
Any deal will be scrutinised carefully by the competition regulator because landlords would face less choice when choosing a lettings agency to manage their properties.
The UK’s two largest estate agents, who between them have tens of thousands of landlord clients, are in talks to merge.
Countrywide and LSL have confirmed this morning that they are in discussions to merge the two businesses following media reports over the weekend.
Neither company is a household name but both operate many of the UK’s best-known estate agencies including Your Move, Reeds Rains, Bairstow Eves, Mann, Hamptons International, John D Wood and Marsh & Parsons.
If the two companies were to successfully merge, it would create a property industry behemoth that would, overnight, become the country’s largest lettings agency and employ over 14,000 people.
But such a powerful and dominant player would give competition regulators serious pause for thought, and it is guaranteed that the deal will be scrutinised by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA); the two companies compete in many towns and cities across the UK with their different brands.
Landlords would therefore have less choice, it would be argued, when picking a lettings agency.
The merger follows difficult times for the two companies, both of which are listed on the London Stock Exchange.
Countrywide has endured a torrid few years during which it has battled mounting losses and ejected its CEO following a string of terrible financial results, while LSL last year executed a brutal cull of branches, keeping only the profitable and best-performing offices and merging, closing or selling off the remainder.
Both have suffered as the UK property market has been battered by consumer worries following the EU Referendum in 2016 and also a contraction of the buy-to-let market following government cuts to landlord tax relief, increasing regulation of the private rented market and the tenant fees ban.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Breaking: UK’s biggest estate agency companies in talks to merge | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Breaking: UK’s biggest estate agency companies in talks to merge
Tech launch: new app helps tenants offset their rental payments when they shop online
The My Rent Award app gives online shopping tenants cash-back payments each month which are then paid to their landlord direct.
A smartphone app has launched that rewards tenants for spending money with leading online retailers and service providers and then gives them money toward paying their rent.
My Rent Awards, which is available to download on both the Apple and Android app platforms, sends tenants vouchers and discount codes to spend at 200 websites.
When users buy goods and services, they are given cash-back credits that are added to a ring-fenced account that is allocated to their rent payments.
Participating companies on the platform include easyJet, Tesco, M&S, Superdrug, Iceland and EE.
It also has agreements with seven major UK Housing Associations; three of which are members of the G15 group – which is campaigning to make renting cheaper in the affordable homes sector.
The free app, developed by Priscilla Mazava and Nichola Fahey, is being offered both to 250,000 housing association tenants but also those in the private rented market.
LandlordZONE contacted the company to ask how the system would work. Its spokesperson replied that: “The money is paid directly to the Landlord. When a user signs up they have to provide their landlord details.”
Many proptech companies have attempted to provide ‘added benefit’ services by placing themselves between tenant and landlord in the payment system, but to date only a few have succeeded.
My Rent Awards, although it is coy about exactly how the system works, says it offers tenants ‘an easy-to-use and manageable process of paying their rent with discounted everyday spending, alongside providing landlords with guaranteed ringfenced payments’.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Tech launch: new app helps tenants offset their rental payments when they shop online | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Tech launch: new app helps tenants offset their rental payments when they shop online
Jersey Landlords Association battles island’s government over ‘heavy handed’ licensing proposals
Landlords and a panel convened to scrutinise proposals to introduce rented property licensing both say it will have the opposite effect intended.
Jersey
landlords are calling on their government to rethink plans for a new licensing
system in the private rented sector.
Ministers hope to set minimum
housing standards and root out rogue landlords flouting the rules by making it
mandatory for all rental properties to sign up and pay for a licence.
This should reveal the location
of every private rented home on the island for the first time.
The Jersey Landlords Association opposes
the plan and believes Rent Safe – a voluntary scheme currently used to
encourage landlords to meet minimum standards – should be developed instead.
It also fears that more red tape
could lead to a possible homes shortage as investors quit the buy-to-let
market.
Chairman Peter Lucas tells LandlordZONE: “We want them to think again – we want to promote landlords’ good behaviour too, but they’re going about it the wrong way.
“There’s no evidence that tenants
are dissuaded from complaining for fear of revenge evictions and there’s
already considerable legislation for people to use to complain.”
The Environment, Housing and Infrastructure Scrutiny
Panel has called for more detail on the financial implications ahead of next
week’s debate in the States, and has questioned how the register would work
alongside the existing Rent Safe scheme.
Chairman, constable Mike Jackson, says: “The panel believes that on balance there are as many bad tenants as there are landlords and that the proposals as lodged are somewhat heavy handed and bureaucratic in an age when most areas of government are trying to reduce ‘red tape’.”
A Jersey Government consultation revealed that some landlords, particularly social landlords, supported the proposals. Tenants were almost unanimously in favour and although some voiced concern over the effect on rental levels, others suggested it would be worth it to ensure good property management and decent property standards.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Jersey Landlords Association battles island’s government over ‘heavy handed’ licensing proposals | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Jersey Landlords Association battles island’s government over ‘heavy handed’ licensing proposals
Landlord’s snap of tenancy welcome pack cleans up on social media
Australian landlord’s collection of gifts to new tenant goes global on Facebook after it divides opinion what ‘passive aggressive’ means in the private rented sector.
Do you thoughtfully provide soap and loo roll for weary new
tenants moving into your property? Maybe you leave out wine or a box of
chocolates to welcome them after a busy day moving house?
But a basket of cleaning products? A dirty trick,
according to social media users who slammed one landlord for providing a washing
basket, bleach, cleaning products, sponges and toilet paper – as well as a
packet of chocolate biscuits – with the note: ‘A housewarming gift for a new
tenant, to help keep our renovated unit in good order’.
While some posted about the Australian landlord’s generous
gesture, others labelled it a passive-aggressive ploy. Wrote one outraged
social media user: “Yeah, now every time they clean they are going to feel your
presumptuous judgment of their cleanliness. I’d chuck it all out so it didn’t
p*** me off.”
Perhaps these
bolshie Aussies are more judgemental than their British counterparts. A survey
by insurance firm Endsleigh found landlords who gave tenants presents usually
chose a bottle of wine, although a quarter gave flowers and plants as
housewarming gifts.
Although it didn’t mention cleaning gifts, about 70% of
the tenants who received presents stayed in their rental property for over two
years, whereas 54% of those who didn’t receive a gift stayed for more than two
years.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Landlord’s snap of tenancy welcome pack cleans up on social media | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Landlord’s snap of tenancy welcome pack cleans up on social media
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,917)
Archives
- December 2024 (44)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords could pay tenants up to two years’ rent for failing Decent Homes Standard as PBSA is exempt
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025