REFERENCING update: Ombudsman ruling backs landlord over ‘reckless’ tenant checks by agency
Adjudication published today finds in favour of landlord after it cost her nearly £5,000 to evict a tenant whom her lettings agency had inadequately referenced.
An important ruling has underlined how the financial consequences of inadequate tenant referencing are the responsibility of a letting agent and not their client landlord.
The Property Ombudsman (TPO) has today expelled Reading firm Concept Lettings Ltd – trading as Concept Sales & Lettings – from its scheme after it failed to repay an award of £4,704 to one of its landlords.
TPO says the dispute arose when the landlord, who has not been named, asked the company to secure a tenant for her property on a find-only basis.
After moving in, the tenant then stopped paying the rent and refused to leave the property, costing the landlord considerable sums in proven financial loss including unpaid rent, court costs and legal expenses.
After the landlord referred the matter to the ombudsman, it was discovered that the agency had failed to reference the tenant properly and that the ensuing costs were ‘entirely avoidable’, the adjudication says.
Reckless
TPO says the inadequate way in which the tenant and their guarantor were referenced was ‘reckless’.
“There was simply not enough information to determine whether the tenant or the guarantor could afford to pay the rent and the results of the referencing provider’s credit score checks could not reasonably be relied on as the reports lacked sufficient detail,” says TPO.
It also reveals that the landlord was not made aware of the significant risks involved when she accepted the tenant’s rental application and had not been told the full facts.
TPO awarded the landlord £4,704 in compensation but the agency failed to pay her the money and has now been expelled and can no longer trade legally or advertise on any of the property portals.
The filing of its accounts at Companies House are two months overdue, its website is offline and its premises have been taken over by another lettings agency.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – REFERENCING update: Ombudsman ruling backs landlord over ‘reckless’ tenant checks by agency | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: REFERENCING update: Ombudsman ruling backs landlord over ‘reckless’ tenant checks by agency
Scottish council hikes HMO licensing charges ten-fold for student landlord
In a worrying development Fife Council has moved its charges from a flat-based fee structure to take into account the number of occupants, increasing its licensing charges from £54,000 to £512,000 for St Andrews University.
Landlords who fear some councils are seeking
to make money from HMO licencing fees should take note from Fife council, which
has hiked its charges for licensing properties to one landlord nearly ten-fold.
Fife Council has recently moved from a
flat-based fee structure for licenses to take into account the number of
occupants in an HMO.
Its new policy includes increasing the fees
charges to St Andrews University from £54,000 every three years to £512,000.
The Student Union says 85% of this fee increase stems from the council’s decision to treat each individual flat, rather than each block, in university student halls’ David Russell Apartments (pictured) as a separate HMO.
Students fear it could lead to them being
priced out of university accommodation and moving into private housing.
The university currently
holds 332 HMO licences, with the council charging a fee for each individual
licence, which should cover administration, visits for inspections and any
other costs.
Last year, it rejected proposals to increase the number
of HMO licenses in St Andrews, in a bid to encourage the university to build
more affordable student accommodation.
Vania Kennedy, housing service manager, told Fife Today: “Fife Council’s fees are in line with those charged by other councils with a high number of HMOs.
“The costs of HMO licensing
represent a small percentage of the income that HMO owners will receive through
rents and there should be no need to pass on the increase in HMO fees to
occupants through rent increases. This is entirely at the discretion of
individual HMO owners.”
No one at Fife Council was available for
comment.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Scottish council hikes HMO licensing charges ten-fold for student landlord | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Scottish council hikes HMO licensing charges ten-fold for student landlord
Rapid eviction of tenants – Q&A
Following on from the webinar we held on the 20th November 2019, we have compiled some further questions that were asked by attendees. The webinar was presented by Matt Carter here at The Sheriffs Office and Yezdan Isset from Bolt Burdon solicitors.
The post Rapid eviction of tenants – Q&A appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Rapid eviction of tenants – Q&A
Tenant handed in notice but wants rent refund?
My live in tenants break clause occurs on the 21st of march 2020, he served 1 month notice 5 days early on the 16th Feb (in writing), stating that he wants to move out on the 16th of March. Although slightly disappointed
The post Tenant handed in notice but wants rent refund? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Tenant handed in notice but wants rent refund?
Labour MP presses government on timetable for Renters’ Reform Bill introduction
Rosie Cooper, Labour MP for West Lancashire has received her response to a written question on the timetable for the introduction of the Renters Reform Bill. It has been two months since Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick MP announced the Renters Reform Bill as part of the Queens Speech. Responding to Ms Cooper’s question, Junior Minister […]
The post Labour MP presses government on timetable for Renters’ Reform Bill introduction appeared first on RLA Campaigns and News Centre.
View Full Article: Labour MP presses government on timetable for Renters’ Reform Bill introduction
Flooding – both a landlord’s and a tenant’s nightmare…
Storms & Floods:
Given the severity
of the bad weather and floods in some areas of the country recently,
the past weeks have been an extremely anxious time for some tenants
and landlords.
Unfortunately it
appears that these worries are not going to go away anytime soon.
Year on year we’ve seen certain locations at risk of flooding and
it could get worse. According to the Environment Agency there are
over 5 million properties in England alone that are at risk of
flooding.
Not only does it
turn lives up-side-down, if not handled sensitively it puts a
tremendous strain on the landlord tenant relationship. Good landlords
will take the view that the situation is devastating for their
tenants and do all they can to help.
This may involve
personally getting involved in the clearing operation and
establishing weather the home is still fit for habitation while the
necessary repairs are carried out.
Sooner or later
thoughts will turn to who is responsible for doing the repairs, the
cost of any temporary accommodation if the place is uninhabitable,
and whom pays for all the repairs and replacements?
In an areas that
have suffered extensive flooding tradespeople are likely to be very
busy, so getting someone to come quickly, even when the insurance
company has assessed the damage and given the go-ahead, could be
problematic and will probably take some time.
First off, the
tenants’ personal possessions are not the landlord’s
responsibility, so unless the tenants have paid for their own
tenant’s contents insurance they will find themselves forking out
for this. If the tenants don’t have contents insurance the local
council might be able to help them with items of necessity through
local charities and their welfare assistance schemes.
Secondly, assuming
the flood was in no way caused by the tenants, the landlord is pretty
much responsible for everything else: any structural damage to the
property, the supply of water, electricity and gas, and re-instating
any damaged appliances, carpets, furniture etc., supplied with the
property. Effectively the landlord must reinstate the property to as
it was before the flood.
Tenants have the
responsibility of minimising flood damage to the property and its
consents as it occurs, within the limits of personal safety, and
informing the landlord and the authorities about the situation
without delay.
If the property is
habitable and the tenant is willing to “work around” or should we
say “live around” the repair work as it progresses, then
negotiations may be entered into regarding some form of proportionate
rent reduction to compensate for the inconvenience.
If agreement can be
met in these circumstances, the onus is then on the landlord to
progress the work as quickly as possible, or at leat within a
reasonable time, given what was mentioned above, that in severely
flooded areas trades skills may be at a premium and trades people
hard to secure.
If the property is
uninhabitable then the situation is much more complicated. The
landlord’s insurance may cover for temporary accommodation for the
tenants, and if the repairs can be carried out within that period,
then all well and good. As the flood was not the fault of the
landlord and everything else being equal, such as the convenience of
the new accommodation, then no further compensation for the tenants
would necessarily be involved.
Where the landlord’s
insurance does not cover for the temporary accommodation, and whether
the remedial work is going to be long-term, than the tenants would
need to contact the local authority for re-housing. There is no
immediate obligation on the landlord to re-house the tenants.
However, if a flood
in the property was caused by the landlord’s neglect, a breach of
Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, which states the
property must be kept in a good state of repair, then responsibility
for rehousing the tenants, and paying the costs of rehousing, would
be on the landlord.
The tenants should
be treated as a priority case by the local authority in this sort of
emergency, bearing in mind there could be many others in the same
situation, but it is an emergency. The local council has a legal
responsibility to find the tenants and family suitable temporary
accommodation, and the tenants might have to register as homeless to
get this process moving.
The landlord and
tenant may want to agree a surrender of the tenancy if the repairs
are likely to take a long time, but otherwise where the tenants wish
to return, they should be continuing to pay the rent, albeit at a
mutually agreed reduced rate, given the inconvenience to them.
Alternatively, where
the tenants are prepared to find and pay for temporary accommodation
themselves, then negotiations could be entered into where the
landlord may suspend the rent payments or pay reasonable costs
towards the alternative accommodation.
For those tenants on
housing benefits, they should seek advice as to what payments are
available toward their existing home’s rent, the temporary
accommodation home’s rent, or a contribution towards both.
Landlords should
check their landlord’s Insurance policy to make sure it provides
adequate cover in the event of flooding.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Flooding – both a landlord’s and a tenant’s nightmare… | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Flooding – both a landlord’s and a tenant’s nightmare…
Major landlord calls for government to change direction on PRS
A leading private rented sector player in both London and beyond tells LandlordZONE that he and the fellow landlords are getting fed up with the government’s conflicted and increasingly political approach to renting.
A senior figure from the property world has made an impassioned plea for central government and local councils to change direction and work with landlords instead of increasingly attempting to trip them up.
The landlord, who has asked that his comments are made anonymously for fear of upsetting local politicians in the areas he operates within, says he is becoming increasingly frustrated by the rhetoric coming from the government, and the conflicting messages he receives from local councils.
The industry figure, who is a significant player in the UK rental market, says he is unhappy that all landlords are tarred with the same brush of being ‘rogue’ even though this type makes up a miniscule percentage of the landlord population.
“There are a lot more rogue tenants than there are rogue landlords,” he says.
“But the current climate is political rather than common sense – you have a government which is trying to appeal with its policies to the millions of potential tenant voters, even though these policies will eventually work against the interest of tenants,” he says.
“This has created an atmosphere where the message from on top is that landlords are ripping tenants off and that we are the bad guys.”
He says politicians need to realise, and quickly, that landlords are providing a service that national and local governments are failing to provide themselves through the social and affordable housing routes.
“We are doing them a favour and yet the politicians are bad-mouthing us, are making it increasingly difficult to evict tenants while local authorities too often brief tenants against us and make it difficult to get licences for properties,” he adds.
He also believes the current policies are wrong-headed because the extra costs of paying fees that tenants once bore, and the spread of expensive selective licensing schemes, will push rents up and make it harder for people to afford rented properties.
For example, in one London borough it costs him £50,000 to licence his 100 apartments within its selective licensing scheme every five years.
“It’s just crazy – landlords can’t endlessly subsidise what is going on,” he says.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Major landlord calls for government to change direction on PRS | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Major landlord calls for government to change direction on PRS
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’