GDPR: New documents live

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Major changes were introduced to data protection rules, known as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on 25th May 2018. Landlords handle personal data, so MUST comply with the new rules, or face legal action potentially leading to fines, or claims by tenants for damages – as must agents. The RLA has already produced an in-depth […]

The post GDPR: New documents live appeared first on RLA Campaigns and News Centre.

View Full Article: GDPR: New documents live

Rent Review, Evidence and GDPR

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Commercial Rent Reviews:

The General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR�) came into force on 25 May 2018. Law-abiding businesses and organisations are busily checking whether computerised and manual records data/information and mailing lists are compliant, asking people to confirm opt-in. An opportunity for businesses to prune mailing lists, it is also an opportunity for anyone on a mailing list to decide whether to continue to subscribe.

Privacy is a big issue. For those of us not on Facebook, Twitter, Linked-in, etc, that such social media can and probably knows about us, merely because their users having agreed without a care for the consequences to allow the social media platform access to the users’ contacts is not ideal, just something to have to come to terms with.

I have been registered under the Data Protection Act 1998 since November 2000. I respect privacy. In the business world, professional rules and codes of conduct normally require members (including employees and staff) to keep their clients’ affairs confidential. Although doubtless that is observed by lawyers and accountants, for some reason the same cannot be said of surveyors generally.

In the commercial property market, (as in every sector of the property market), all transactions and agreements between landlord and tenant are confidential. Strictly, as I understand, information is disclosable to unconnected persons only with permission of all the ‘parties’ concerned.

I emphasise ‘parties’ because it is the parties whose permission is required, not their advisers. It is not permitted for one party to disclose information without first obtaining permission from the other party/parties. It is not permitted for an adviser to unilaterally decide without authority okay to disclose a confidentiality.

The reason that the same attitude towards confidentiality cannot be said of surveyors generally is not that many haven’t got time for all that nonsense, any more than a certain type of person has any respect for GDPR by thinking themselves above the law, but for the consequences for valuation were confidentiality strictures to be enforced.

I daresay that, quite possibly, the commercial property market in its present form would collapse were it not for the free sharing and unbridled circulation of confidential data/information. We surveyors do not make the market: we simply interpret it for the benefit our clients.

Although valuation is not an exact science, the emphasis on the science, rather than the art (as in confident of something but unable to prove it), means that where the tangible evidence is not within the surveyor’s personal knowledge and experience, it must come from somewhere someone else.

What keeps the market in good shape is that between surveyors is an unwritten implied duty to keep shared data/information confidential. That duty applies not only to data/information where the surveyors themselves are or have been involved, but also data/information via usual behind-the-scenes channels, for example, surveyors imparting and sharing data/information, reciprocal interests.

Where the valuation for capital and rental valuation is based upon evidence, commonly known as “comparable evidenceâ€� – whether or not it would pass the tests of comparability – the availability of the evidence depends upon someone somewhere authorised to disclose or more commonly and most likely breaching a confidence.

It is not compulsory (except by court order) for landlords and/or tenants and/or their respective surveyors to be helpful to one another. Indeed, many landlords and tenants prefer to mind their own business and not become involved. Tenants especially can be reluctant to disclose information about the tenancy in case the data should end up being used against them.

So, although the terminology ‘open market’ means anyone and everyone, in practice it can mean just a few. At rent review (to an extent at lease renewal also), within the meaning of ‘hypothetical willing’ is that the existence of a market is assumed, also it is not necessary to identify who would want the premises only that someone somewhere would. But surveyors and valuers, particularly for capital and mortgage valuations, tend to prefer something more concrete than that.

Investors likewise: as a marketing ploy to attract offers from the inexperienced, the trend in recent years for particulars of (overpriced) propositions is to include a list of recent transactions prices and rents as a means of reassurance.

The generality of data, details of premises to let, leases for assignment and sub-let, press releases, industry media and company reports, rating areas, and so on, are useful as rough guides, but at rent review and lease renewal far more detail is needed.

Where rent review is to open market rent and the valuation based upon evidence, unless the landlord and/or the tenant between them own all the properties that are forever going to be used as the only evidence, inevitably some if not all of the evidence will have to be sourced from others.

The imparting and sharing of information between surveyors respectful of the implied duty of confidentiality enables the data/information to be interpreted for use or not during negotiation; and as evidence to a third party such as an arbitrator, independent expert, or in court.

A difficulty arises when surveyors in receipt of confidential information are obliged or expected to disclose that information to clients, in explanation of how a recommendation has been arrived at and in written reports for rent review and lease renewal.

It is said that a characteristic amongst historians is nosiness. I venture to suggest the same can be said of local traders and small shopkeepers. In my experience, which fortunately is not extensive – I say ‘fortunately’ because in my limited experience one has to have the patience of a saint to listen to all manner of irrelevancies when advising local traders on rent review and business tenancies – wanting to know what everyone else is paying and expecting to be told as a matter of course stretches the bounds of confidentiality.

The difference between being curious and being nosy involves a genuine interest, rather than trying to pry information out, perhaps for gossip or to judge. Nosiness usually involves trying to be privy to something that isn’t really any of the enquirer’s business. To whom the information belongs is a moot point.

Where the information is obtained to serve a particular client, whether the evidence (presupposing the information useful as evidence) would be forthcoming were its source not wanting to help the particular surveyor and/or indirectly the particular client is I should think unlikely. But where the evidence is obtained by the surveyor for the sake of it, or from other matters nothing to do with the client in question, I see no reason why that client should be able to claim ‘ownership’, let alone expect to be provided with full details.

The keeping of old files after completion of an instruction is a matter of law and thereafter data storage space. What surveyors do with the evidence that arises during negotiation is a matter for the surveyors concerned. For my part, I centralise the information on my database: it might never come in handy but if it were to then at least I wouldn’t have to wade through an old file.

At rent review for determination of the rent by an Independent Expert, the parties or their surveyors will normally preface their respective reports with something along the lines of my “neither the whole or any part of this Report or any reference to it may be included in any document or communication in any way other than for the purpose for which it is intended, without my written approval of the form and context in which it may appear.�  Whether that is actually respected depends upon the trustworthiness of the persons involved in the matter.

At rent review arbitration, confidentiality is the law. Per Dolling-Baker v Merrett [1990]:

“as between parties to an arbitration, although the proceedings are consensual and may thus be regarded as wholly voluntary, their very nature is such that there must, in my judgment, be some implied obligation on the parties not to disclose or use for any other purpose any documents prepared for and used in the arbitration, or transcripts of notes of the evidence in the arbitration or the award, save with the consent of the other party, or pursuant to an order of leave of the Court .. ..

“… the fact that a document is used in an arbitration does not confer on it any confidentiality or privilege which can be availed of in subsequent proceedings … But that the obligation exists in some form appears to me to be abundantly apparent. It is not a question of immunity or public interest. It is a question of an implied obligation arising out of the nature of arbitration itself.â€�

At a lease renewal in court, (substantive hearing) it is common for a surveyor expert witness to cite evidence obtained from others.  The rules regarding hearsay evidence have been relaxed. Pro-forma evidence provided by surveyors is notoriously unreliable.

Whether the evidence is investigated and verified for authenticity depends upon the expert’s conscientiousness. If the evidence presented to the court does not also state the reason to the source of the evidence the reason for wanting the evidence or what it would be used for then in the context of confidentiality it could be reasoned a data breach.

Also, assuming the client has the right to see its lawyer’s file, also its surveyor’s file, I should think it necessary for the lawyer and/or surveyor to each inform the client of the need to respect the confidentiality of any evidence. And theoretically if not also in practice for the lawyer and/or surveyor to have gotten permission from the source of the evidence to allow others to see the evidence.

Generally, in court, anyone present and listening becomes privy to confidential data/information. I have yet to read a law report that mentions that the evidence in court has confidentiality clearance.

Between landlord and tenant, whether either or both parties are represented or not, it is not necessary for the rent review clause to be satisfied during negotiation. Landlord and tenant, between themselves or represented, can agree whatever they like.

It is only when the agreement is cited as evidence in connection with another matter that how the agreement was arrived at is scrutinised. No criticism can be levelled at landlords and tenants, represented or not, for the rent they agree. The difficulty for surveyors is in drawing comparison: any bias in assuming the parties would have satisfied the review clause stems from a need to control the direction of the market by steering the evidence in favour of the client.

Where the information has not been released from confidentiality by permission of the parties concerned, it will be interesting to experience whether a breach of GDPR can be used to defeat the admissibility of that evidence.

Michael Lever
The Rent Review Specialist
Established 1975

©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Rent Review, Evidence and GDPR | LandlordZONE.

View Full Article: Rent Review, Evidence and GDPR

How to Rent guide updated yet again!

admin    Uncategorized     agents

The recently updated ‘How to Rent’ guide has been updated yet again!

The 9th of July 2018 edition now replaces the 10th of June 2018 edition.

Click Here to download the full document which must be provided by landlords and agents to all new tenants.

The post How to Rent guide updated yet again! appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: How to Rent guide updated yet again!

Troublesome Tenants in small close?

admin    Uncategorized     agents

We are a small close of residential tenants where elderly and disabled people live. Approximately three months ago a flat in the close was let to a single female.

She moved in almost immediately with a person we suspect is her brother.

The post Troublesome Tenants in small close? appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Troublesome Tenants in small close?

New training courses dates added-get 20% off selected courses this July

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Due to popular demand the RLA has added some extra dates to its courses, including Gaining Possession, Landlords Update and Complete Fire Safety. And, when you book this month, many of our courses are 20% off. Learn more about some of our courses below. Gaining Possession course Whether you’re a landlord planning on issuing your […]

The post New training courses dates added-get 20% off selected courses this July appeared first on RLA Campaigns and News Centre.

View Full Article: New training courses dates added-get 20% off selected courses this July

DWP seek landlords and agents to test new service in live environment

admin    Uncategorized     agents

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is seeking landlords and letting agents who rent to tenants on Universal Credit, to trial a new service. Over the past year, the DWP has been working with landlords to improve the process for requesting direct rent payments or rent arrears deductions for landlords, with tenants who are […]

The post DWP seek landlords and agents to test new service in live environment appeared first on RLA Campaigns and News Centre.

View Full Article: DWP seek landlords and agents to test new service in live environment

How to Rent guide updated-make sure you issue correct version

admin    Uncategorized     agents

The Government’s How to Rent guide has been updated, just two weeks after the previous update. The update means that IT IS IMPORTANT that anyone who downloaded 26th June version of the booklet, now downloads and uses this new version WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT.  The How to Rent booklet, the latest version of which can be downloaded here, forms […]

The post How to Rent guide updated-make sure you issue correct version appeared first on RLA Campaigns and News Centre.

View Full Article: How to Rent guide updated-make sure you issue correct version

Yet another new Housing Minister

admin    Uncategorized     agents

New Housing Minister:

Kit Malthouse has been appointed the latest in a rapid succession of housing ministers after Dominic Raab was appointed Brexit Secretary of State following David Davis’ resignation this week.

Industry leaders are appalled at the latest change in this post as Malthouse becomes the 17^th Housing Minister in 20 years, each minister averaging just 14 months in post, whilst high flying Dominic Rabb’s term was a mere 6 months.

Mr Malthouse, the MP for north-west Hampshire, was previously minister for family support, housing and child maintenance. Alok Sharma, who also held the post for just six months preceded Rabb, giving the impression that housing comes way down the list in the order of government priorities.

This latest move comes just a few months after James Brokenshire was brought in as secretary of state for Housing, Communities and Local Government (HCLG) when Sajid Javid left to run the Home Office.

At a time when there are several ongoing initiatives in the housing sector, not least with private rented sector (PRS) legislative changes, people in the industry are becoming disillusioned, not just because of the lack of continuity, but because of doubts about the government’s apparent lack of commitment to solving the many issues affecting the sector.

There are serious doubts about the government’s strategy with the PRS following a raft of legislative changes affecting landlords and letting agents. The removal of mortgage tax relief and depreciation allowances for landlords, regulatory changes to tenancies, the tightening of mortgage lending criteria and another slew of impending changes including a tenant fees ban, plus the possible introduction of three-year minimum tenancies, all with as yet unknown long-term consequences for buy-to-let.

The apparent lack of consistency and commitment comes at a time when the government really does need to make housing a priority, and point acknowledged by every one of these successive ministers, but despite this there is no sign yet of a firm and long-term commitment to the role.

Mr Malthouse was formerly Chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority and the first Statutory Deputy Mayor for Policing, and a former city councillor and Deputy Leader of Westminster City Council, London. Following the 2018 Cabinet reshuffle, he was appointed Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Department for Work and Pensions. He has now been appointed Minister of State for Housing, at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.

©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Yet another new Housing Minister | LandlordZONE.

View Full Article: Yet another new Housing Minister

Rent A Room consultation will hit Airbnb style letting

admin    Uncategorized     agents

The Government consultation on Rent A Room tax reliefs looks set hit Airbnb style letting of entire properties rather than individual room lodger type agreements.

Click here to see the full consultation.

Executive Summary:

Rent a room relief allows individuals to earn up to £7,500 tax free from letting out furnished accommodation in their main or only residence.

The post Rent A Room consultation will hit Airbnb style letting appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Rent A Room consultation will hit Airbnb style letting

Search for yield further north…

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Rental Yield:

Research by Direct Line for Business shows that there is significantly variation in landlords’ income yield, depending on where they buy. Buy-to-let investors are being encouraged to look further afield for yield.

According to this research, reported by The FT, buy-to-let investors are wise to look across the regions and do their own thorough research if they want to secure a decent yield from their rental properties.

For example, Burnley in Lancashire, according to Direct Line, recorded had the highest annualised rental yield in the country. Average house prices in the town were just £76,300, while a typical annual rent in Burnley is around £5,388.

Of course, yield reflects risk, so landlords need to be aware that although the prices are low, and consequently rental yields are high, there are more risks associated with these types of investments.

What’s more, investing at a distance is always more problematic than doing so on the doorstep: landlords are then totally in the hands of their letting agent to manage their tenancies. That’s all fine if landlords can find good agents, but if bad agents are engaged the investment can turn out to be nightmarish.

The Direct Line research found that while house prices have risen by around 17 per cent over the last three years, rents are up by just 4.7 per cent. And while the average yield achieved across the UK is 3.6 per cent, some buyers, depending on where they buy, can achieve as high as 7.1 per cent.

Other locations in the top league as far as yield is concerned were the Cities of Glasgow (6.9%) and Belfast (6.4), whereas at the other extreme, average yields in London and the south east were considerably lower.

In some parts of London landlords can achieve annual rents of £20,000 or more, but as average house prices can top £480,000, the average yield recorded by Direct Line was more like 4.4 per cent.

Conversely, in the east of England, where house prices average around £289,000, average rents are the lowest in the country, resulting in an average yield of just 3.5 per cent.

Daniel Bailey, principal at Middleton Finance, told The FT:

“Most of my buy-to-let investors don’t tend to pay more than £125,000. If they go beyond that then the yield tends to not be as good.

“Purchase price is a major factor and some areas will attract a better monthly rent. I have some clients achieving yields of 7 to 10 per cent.

“There are still good yields to be achieved but it is important to speak to a broker and property tax expert to understand all of the implications.”

Direct Line said increased competition in the private rented sector was hitting yields.

Christina Dimitrov, business manager at Direct Line for Business, had said:

“While property prices have increased in recent years, it’s a different story for the rental markets where growth in rents in lower than wage growth.”

©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Search for yield further north… | LandlordZONE.

View Full Article: Search for yield further north…