New proposals for leasehold reform…
Leasehold reform:
The Law Commission
of England and Wales has published a new report outlining the options
to simplify the rules for leaseholds and reduce the cost to
leaseholders when they buy the freehold or extend the lease to their
homes.
This is important
for many landlords because they may be leaseholders or freeholders or
in some cases both, depending on where and how they invest.
The Government’s
latest estimates show there were 1.4m leasehold houses in England in
2015-16, compared with the previous estimate of 1.2m in 2014-15,
following a change in methodology to include socially rented
properties.
There are also
around 2.9m leasehold flats, up from 2.8m previously thought. In
total, nearly one-fifth of all properties in England are leaseholds.
This stems from an explosion of apartment building in big cities, but
it’s down to developers’ controversial move to selling new homes
as leasehold instead of allowing a freehold title.
Many thousands of
new homebuyers have been caught-up in the controversy of ground
rents’ costs spiralling out of control on leasehold properties,
which have in some cases left owners of homes in virtually unsaleable
properties.
Reforms
The reforms have the
potential to make the process of leasehold enfranchisement easier and
more affordable for the millions of leaseholders throughout England
and Wales.
The report suggests
a range of options to make it cheaper for leaseholders to buy their
freehold or extend their lease. As well as reducing the price, these
options are intended to clarify and simplify the law, making the
process of leasehold enfranchisement easier and less expensive to
operate.
The Government had
asked the Law Commission to review the law of leasehold
enfranchisement following recent publicity about leaseholders finding
themselves at the mercy of developers and freeholders when they
signed up for leases on new-build properties. The Government’s
stated aim was to promote transparency and fairness in the
residential leasehold sector and provide a better deal for
leaseholders.
On the question of
valuation, the Law Commission was tasked with providing options to
reduce the premium (price) payable when both existing and future
leaseholders want to enfranchise their homes, whilst ensuring
sufficient compensation is paid to landlords to reflect their
legitimate property interests.
The report
re-examines the method by which the value of a landlord’s interest
is calculated, and therefore to identify possible reforms that could
lower the lease premiums, without at the same time breaching the UK’s
human rights legislation that protects the landlord’s property
interests.
The report puts
forward three suggested key schemes for determining the premium, each
of which will make enfranchisement cheaper, saving leaseholders
money. Each scheme uses a different method to determine the price of
enfranchisement and allow further reforms to make the process simpler
and to reduce uncertainty, says the Law Commission.
The report explains
how a simple formulae (for example a simple multiple of ground rent)
could be used in a new system, but explains that their wider use is
not possible under the UK’s human rights laws.
The Commission
puts forward a range of other options for reform:
- Prescribing the
rates used in calculating the price, to remove a key source of
disputes, and make the process simpler, more certain and predictable - Helping
leaseholders with onerous ground rents, by capping the level of
ground rent used to calculate the premium - The creation of
an online calculator for determining the premium to make it easier
to find out the cost of enfranchisement, and reduce uncertainty
around the process - Enabling
leaseholders who are collectively enfranchising a block of flats to
avoid paying “development value” to the landlord unless and
until they actually undertake further development.
Professor Nicholas
Hopkins, Property Law Commissioner has said:
“We were asked to
provide options for reform that save leaseholders money when buying
their freehold or extending their lease, while ensuring that
sufficient compensation is paid to landlords. This is what we’ve
done.
“We are ready to
help the Government in implementing whichever options for reform they
choose.”
Housing Secretary Rt
Hon Robert Jenrick MP said:
“I welcome these
proposals from the Law Commission which provide options to make it
simpler and faster for leaseholders to buy their freehold or extend
their lease.
“I will consider
the proposals outlined in this report carefully and set out our
preferred way forward in due course.
“We have already
committed to addressing the abuses of leasehold seen in recent years,
by reducing ground rents to a peppercorn level and limiting new
leasehold to apartments, save in the most exceptional circumstances.
The Competition and Markets Authority is examining the alleged
misselling of leasehold properties and I will also await their
findings with interest.”
Consultation and
Progress:
The Commission has
said they consulted widely in putting together the options for
reform.
“Leaseholders have
advocated sweeping reform to lower the cost of enfranchisement of
their homes. We have heard contrary arguments from landlords and
investors – including charities and pension providers – the value
of whose interests would fall if premiums are reduced.”
The Law Commission
says it doesn’t hold views on which scheme and which other options
for reform should be adopted, as this is ultimately a decision for
Government.
Further
recommendations are to be made in the coming months for reforms to
improve the current complex enfranchisement system.
“We will also be
publishing reports on reforms to make commonhold a viable alternative
to leasehold, and on improvements to the law that gives leaseholders
the right to manage their
properties,” says
the Commission.
Mark Steggles,
partner at law firm Thomson Snell & Passmore on the Law
Commission’s report says:
“The Law
Commission’s report sets out a path for making leasehold
enfranchisement simpler, more transparent and cheaper for
leaseholders. The report sets out three alternative options for a new
regime for calculating the premiums payable to extend a lease or
purchase a freehold, and a further seven sub-options in terms of
items to consider when calculating the premiums for each regime.
“The potential
abolition of marriage value (which is the increase in value that
occurs where a tenant acquires the freehold) is the proposed reform
most likely to concern landlords as it would decrease the value of
the premiums payable by the tenants.
“However, this
proposed reform, together with the proposed introduction of
prescribed rates for calculating premiums and a suggested route for
capping the impact of ground rent escalators that are causing such
controversy at the moment, are likely to be warmly received by
leaseholders.”
You can read the
full report, summary and other supporting documents on the link
below:
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – New proposals for leasehold reform… | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: New proposals for leasehold reform…
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,865)
Archives
- November 2024 (56)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Rising rents and slow house price growth amid economic uncertainty
- Why Southwark Council’s Attack on Letting Agents Is Misguided
- Why the Buy-to-Let Dream is Dead: How the Government Killed the UK’s Best Investment
- NRLA blast Housing Minister’s court system remarks
- Why Do You Really Want to Invest in Property?