Tax Tribunal ruling favours landlords
Stamp Duty Surcharge:
Derelict properties may be exempt the SDLT surcharge.
The Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) paid by landlords on purchasing
a buy-to-let, and for those purchasing a second home, including when a 1st
home has not been sold on transition, attracts a 3% surcharge.
First announced in the 2015 autumn statement, this surcharge
became effective from 1st April 2016 for exchanged contracts after 26 November
2015.
However, following a recent ruling by the First Tier Tax Tribunal
(PDF) the higher rate of SDLT may not be payable if it can be shown that
the purchased property is too dilapidated to live in.
In the case of PN Bewley Ltd against HMRC, the plaintiff
argued that where second properties are purchased which are deemed as
uninhabitable upon completion of the sale, they do not constitute as a “dwelling’
as defined under the Finance Act 2003.
The property and transaction in question involved a derelict
bungalow and plot of land in Weston-super-Mare. A purchasing couple, Paul and
Nikki Bewley, had set-up a limited company to acquire the property for £200,000
in January 2017. Their intention was to demolish the bungalow and re-build with
a new dwelling on the same site. The couple had acquired the property with planning
permission already granted for this change, to the previous owner.
Before, the purchased property had been vacant for several
years. The central heating system had been removed, and the wall, ceilings and
floors were full of holes following surveyors’ inspections and there was said
to be dangerous white asbestos cement present.
The Bewleys argued that they should only pay the standard
rate of SDLT since the property was clearly derelict and not suitable for
occupation, but HMRC disagreed. It argued that the bungalow was a dwelling
despite its dilapidation, and could be renovated to form a serviceable home. It
then amended the Bewleys’ tax return applying the higher rate of SDLT.
The Bewleys appealed to the First-tier Tax Tribunal and the
ruling went in their favour.
After carefully considering the case Judge Richard Thomas
said that the test set out in law is whether the building is “suitable� for use
as a dwelling at the point at which the SDLT became payable. After examining the
photographic evidence supplied, he decided that in this case it clearly was
not.
Accordingly, the judge ruled that the Bewleys had been
overcharged, and he reduced the self-assessment SDLT bill.
The case underlines the importance to landlords, developers,
agents and conveyancers to establish the condition of a purchased property, and
it opens up the possibility that developers and landlords may have paid an
inappropriate amount of SDLT and may be in a position to reclaim.
Stamp Duty Land Tax – Residential Rates
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Tax Tribunal ruling favours landlords | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Tax Tribunal ruling favours landlords
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,864)
Archives
- November 2024 (55)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Why Southwark Council’s Attack on Letting Agents Is Misguided
- Why the Buy-to-Let Dream is Dead: How the Government Killed the UK’s Best Investment
- NRLA blast Housing Minister’s court system remarks
- Why Do You Really Want to Invest in Property?
- Demand for accessible rental homes surges – LRG