Top 10 PRS Cost Considerations for Landlords
Build-to-Rent:
According to the most recent Government paper on the issue “Building the New Private Rented Sector: Issues and prospects, the Private Rental Sector (PRS) is now the second largest housing tenure in England, having overtaken social housing in 2011.
Since 2010, the Government has focused on institutional investment in the PRS to boost supply and answer the challenges of the housing crisis in the UK.
With the majority of PRS homes in the country supplied to market by buy-to-let landlords, Tower Eight explores the significant cost issues around the Build to Rent model and how landlords can mitigate them:
- Building Fabric & Balconies
There is the need to balance the architectural aspect, planning element and greater consideration around durability of materials, their replacement and clearing. The operational considerations should be also be reviewed to include greater provision for cleaning and maintenance. It will come down to a balance between practical access and the aesthetics of the scheme.  But the ability to facilitate the ongoing maintenance of the building will inevitably be much more of a consideration than on scheme with units for sale.
- Modular Components
As the BTR model expands, there will be growth in the supply chain that services this element of the market and with this will come more specialisation of components. In turn, this will reduce build time and cost as the sector matures. As the sector evolves and suitable components become standardised, and where there is repetition across schemes, then the costs will start coming down even more in the area.
- Apartment Fit OutÂ
BTR schemes will generate a significant body of work around the life cycle costing of wall and floor finishes against the refresh period of units. A key element of this assessment will be the use of durable products that can be easily replaced due to high usage and different occupiers over the lifecycle of the scheme. This will also involve the substitution of high end fixtures for those that offer more durability, much as we see a balance between practicality and quality in the hotel model.
- Amenity Spaces & Offering
There needs to be a balance between communal space and the additional facilities that are provided within the scheme to those that are available locally.   Arguably, PRS planners need to work even harder to generate a sense of place and introduce elements that encourage long-term occupancy, while also developing a sense of longer term brand loyalty.
It is about understanding how flexible these spaces, are and how could they be adjusted to reflect demand in the future. In recognition of the need to adapt to tenant demand, amenity areas should be kept flexible as use may change depending on demand and demographic of tenant base – this should be incorporated in design so that the cost of change is kept minimal.
- Communal areas
Proper consideration of the design facets of communal areas will extend the tenants’ demise.  If it retains customers for the long-term and improves a sense of “brand� then it will need to be in the costs. This will also lead to other considerations such as the introduction of natural lighting in communal areas and furnishing requirements.
This initial outlay may ultimately benefit the scheme by enticing a different kind of end user, and one that is more engaged with the property. And this carries benefits both in the short and long term, if the scheme can operate at a different pricing level and retain clients for the long term.
- Unit Sizes & Mix
Both the mixture of units on the scheme and their sizes will have to be led by higher density schemes to ensure the fundamental business case stacks up. In a market where land values are as high as they are, the higher unit density will increase the revenue generated per sq. ft. and, ultimately, make these schemes competitive with the residential sales model. The schemes will have to be designed for functionality and be highly efficient with unit sizes closely aligned to rental value and price points that have been scrupulously researched.
- Mechanical Electrical and Public Health Systems
The careful adoption of the right technology will ensure that elements of these schemes do not become quickly obsolete as that would obviously impact on their ability to provide a long term solution for tenants. And, it will also affect ongoing rental value and drive up the cost of refurbishments so they must be futureproofed from the outset.
- Procurement
To gain significant competitive advantage and deliver on the necessary housing numbers, developers need to be thinking about seven or eight schemes at a time and benefit from the ensuing economies of scale. This will facilitate programme wide procurement and service level agreements, all of which we contribute to scalability and a lower cost model.
- Â WarrantiesÂ
As the operator of the space, the developer will fall liable for the upkeep of these goods – that is the way many PRS schemes are now going – and ensuring sufficient warranties will minimise that risk but increase costs in the short-term.  Latent defects insurance will also come into play too by which to recover the costs of replacing, strengthening or repairing the site if an inherent defect is discovered.
- RefurbishmentÂ
Responsibility will sit with the operator of PRS schemes to maintain its standards, so the ability to replace fixtures and fittings, and the durability of these items must be factored in.  Similarly the longevity of the building itself must be maintained as these schemes are a long-term play and any signs of fatigue will impact on the long-term rent-ability of the scheme.  All of these elements will play a key role in developing and maintaining the brand of the schemes and the operators responsible for them.
ConclusionÂ
The PRS has changed so much in recent years but our experience of the market would suggest that the real force of change is set for the next few years. The industry-approach to PRS development is evolving. Developers are now taking a different approach to amenity space, planning for long-term engagement with the client and, in essence, building brands for the future.
This approach appeals to both investors and tenants alike, but for it to be truly successful does require it will change the approach to both development costs and operational costs. Ultimately the consumer is already asking more questions of PRS developments and developers need to be ready to answer them. A progressive approach to these schemes is the only way forward and understanding the investment required to go alongside this approach is critical to success.
About TowerEight
TowerEight is an experienced, independent, project and cost management consultancy, which provides first class services to the construction and property industry. The team pride themselves on finding intelligent solutions for our clients and conduct themselves with a “total commitment to deliver as trusted partners�. With a team of over 70 based in headquarters on London’s Great Portland Street, TowerEight offers a range of services including project management, cost management, project monitoring, and acquisition support services.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Top 10 PRS Cost Considerations for Landlords | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Top 10 PRS Cost Considerations for Landlords
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,864)
Archives
- November 2024 (55)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Why Southwark Council’s Attack on Letting Agents Is Misguided
- Why the Buy-to-Let Dream is Dead: How the Government Killed the UK’s Best Investment
- NRLA blast Housing Minister’s court system remarks
- Why Do You Really Want to Invest in Property?
- Demand for accessible rental homes surges – LRG