BREAKING: Eviction notice periods returning to normal on 1st October, ministry confirms
The government has confirmed that notice periods for evictions in England will return to normal on October 1st, as planned, but has warned that they could be curtailed again if the pandemic were to worsen once more.
This means landlords giving notice of their intention to evict via either a Section 21 or Section 8 notice will need to give two months’ notice, down from six months prior to October 1st.
It has now been 18 months since the government introduced emergency measures as part of the Coronavirus Act 2020 that protect renters by requiring landlords to provide longer notice periods when seeking possession of residential property in the social and private rental sectors.
These were modified several times during the long months of the pandemic depending on the reasons for the eviction.
A statement from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says: “While these measures were appropriate at the height of the pandemic, these restrictions could only ever be temporary. Returning notice periods to their pre-COVID lengths from 1 October will allow landlords to repossess their property where necessary.
Situation worsens
“However, we intend to retain the power to implement these measures again in the case that the public health situation worsens and these measures are required again.”
The government has layed a statutory instrument in parliament to return notice periods to their pre-Covid terms, but has inserted a clause that will allow them to be reinstated up until 25th March 2022 ‘should the future public health situation warrant a further extension ’.
Isobel Thomson (pictured), Chief Executive of property industry organisation safeagent, says: “We welcome the clarity from Government regarding notice periods and the return to a reasonable and fair timescale for landlords to be able to obtain possession of their property where appropriate.
“We feel that recognition should be given to the proven ability of landlords, tenants and agents who during the pandemic have worked together to maintain tenancies.
“When notice periods return to pre-COVID levels we don’t believe there will be any less appetite to sustain those tenancies or that we’ll see a sudden spike in evictions.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – BREAKING: Eviction notice periods returning to normal on 1st October, ministry confirms | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: BREAKING: Eviction notice periods returning to normal on 1st October, ministry confirms
Bigger tax bills for the self employed in 2022/23
The ending of an overlap period for profits for the self-employed could result in bigger tax bills.
A change in the basis periods for the assessment of self-employed profits to coincide with the tax year has been proposed by HMRC. The new rules would apply from 2023/24 onwards.
This is only a consultation right now, but the release of draft legislation suggests change is likely.
Businesses and individuals may wish to speak with their advisors and establish the likely impact on their cash flows of the proposed change. There will be a balancing act between the cash flow implications of paying all your tax in one go, put against the risk of higher profits and tax rates in the future.
The change will mean that profits or losses will be apportioned to tax years where the period of account does not coincide with the tax year. The change is intended to coincide with the start of Making Tax Digital for income tax.
The change will mean that the transitional rules being proposed for the previous 2022/23 tax year could result in larger tax bills for some sole traders and partners, particularly those with an existing 30 April year end.
The profits of year ended 30 April 2021 would be taxed in 2021/22 under the current rules with 2023/24 tax profits arising between 6 April 2023 and 5 April 2024 under the new rules. But what about 2022/23?
HMRC’s proposal means that all self-employed businesses will be taxed on profits earned in a tax year, rather than on the profits of the accounting year ending in that tax year.
The overlap profits are carried forward and set against future profits in certain circumstances, such as leaving the business, the business ceasing or a change in the accounting year.
The profits taxed in 2022/23 would be those for year ended 30 April 2022 plus the period 1 May 2022 to 5 April 2023 – in total 23 months profits!
However, to soften the blow there would be a deduction for 11 months “overlap relief” which typically arose when profits were taxed twice at the start of the business – but those will often be much lower than the extra 11 months being taxed in 2022/23!
The transitional provisions will allow the taxpayer to elect to spread the excess profits over the next 5 tax years to smooth out an excessive tax bill.
The change will mean that any profit or loss for the business is the profit or loss arising in the tax year, regardless of the accounting date. Where a business has a year end other than 31 March – accepted by HMRC as being 5 April for these purposes – profits are to be apportioned between tax years.
It will prevent overlap profits from accumulating in the future and will result in the offset of any unused overlap profits for those in business, when the change is made.
Sole traders, partners in partnerships, members of LLPs and other unincorporated entities with trading income, such as trading trusts and estates and likely to be affected.
VAT – option to tax on land and buildings – notify HMRC within 30 days
Supplies of land and buildings, such leasing or renting out a property, are normally exempt from VAT.
This means that no VAT is payable, but the person making the supply cannot normally recover any of the VAT incurred on property expenses.
However, it is possible to waive the exemption, or in other words inform HMRC that you want to “opt to tax” the land. For the purposes of VAT, the term ‘land’ includes any buildings or structures permanently affixed to it.
Once you have opted to tax, all the supplies you make of your interest in the land or buildings will normally be VAT standard-rated, but by charging VAT on supplies it will normally enable you to recover any VAT expenses you incur in making those supplies.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Bigger tax bills for the self employed in 2022/23 | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Bigger tax bills for the self employed in 2022/23
Handling of Green Homes Grant voucher scheme slammed by watchdog
The government’s handling of the Green Homes Grant voucher scheme has been slammed by spending watchdog the National Audit Office (NAO).
In a report published today, it says the scheme was delivered to an over-ambitious timetable and was not executed to an acceptable standard, significantly limiting its impact on job creation and carbon reduction.
Both landlords and home-owners were able to access the scheme, which offered vouchers of up to £5,000 that could be then spent with approved tradespeople and builders to upgrade their homes via energy efficient improvements.
It was a key plank of the government’s dual policies of achieve Net Zero for England and Wales by 2030, and stimulating the economy during the darkest days of the Covid pandemic.
The NAO says the scheme, which opened to applications in September last year but closed at the end of March, did not meet many of its aims.
It cites government figures revealing that it created 5,600 jobs against an expected 82,500 and that only £319 million of its £1.5 billion budget was spent, of which £50.5 million was spent on administration.
As LandlordZONE reported in December, many property owners and installers had a poor experience using the scheme.
This included delays issuing vouchers to landlords and paying installers, ‘causing frustration’, and that the manual application process was complicated and time-consuming.
The NAO says its teething and ongoing problems were down to the short timescale HM Treasury gave the department of business to design and launch the scheme, and that the views of approved installers were only sought after the scheme was launched, particularly on the cost and process of installer accreditation.
The watchdog also says too much focus was put on more technical green improvements to properties which required an army of specialists to be trained, rather than simpler upgrades such as windows, doors and insulation.
“The initial plan for a two-year scheme would have allowed more time for jobs to be created, but this was rejected by HM Treasury,” the NAO says.
“The Department should engage properly with the supplier market for future decarbonisation schemes and base its planning on a realistic assessment of how long it will take the market to mobilise.”
Rushed
NAO chief Gareth Davies (pictured) says: “The aim to achieve immediate economic stimulus through the Green Homes Grant voucher scheme meant that it was rushed.
“As a result, its benefits for carbon reduction were significantly reduced and ultimately, it did not create the number of jobs government had hoped for.”
Timothy Douglas, Propertymark Policy and Campaigns Manager at trade organisation Propertymark, says: “The Green Homes Grant Voucher Scheme was the first we have seen after years of no funding and it’s extremely disappointing that the Scheme was poorly executed.
“Financial support for the sector is fundamental if energy efficiency targets are to be achieved and the National Audit Offices’ recent report examining the UK Government’s Green Homes Grant Voucher Scheme has reiterated our concerns with the schemes implementation.
“The time frame for its application was unrealistic and therefore failed to provide landlords and homeowners with enough incentives and access to sustained funding.”
Read the NAO’s summary of its report.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Handling of Green Homes Grant voucher scheme slammed by watchdog | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Handling of Green Homes Grant voucher scheme slammed by watchdog
What do landlords do if their tenants are forced to evacuate their home?
A huge blaze at a plastics factory last week caused explosions and a massive plume of black smoke, visible for miles around, leading to the evacuation of nearby homes.
Anyone living within 500 metres of the industrial estate in Leamington Spa, which is surrounded by residential areas, was urged to keep windows and doors closed and homes within 100 metres were evacuated.
Local media reported cases of people vomiting from the fumes and a large amount of charred plastic debris from the fire falling over a sizeable area. Dramatic footage on social media highlights the scale of the incident.
Emergency workers are still unable to enter the site at Leeson Polyurethanes to search for a missing man. Warwickshire Police have said that “a specialist search operation will commence as soon as it is safe to do so.” They added that it would be “a very thorough and complex operation which may take a number of days to complete.”
The cause of this incident is not yet confirmed and is currently under investigation, but the Chief Fire Officer from the Warwickshire Fire and Rescue Service has suggested that vats of chemicals caught in the fire were likely responsible for the explosions.
The incident highlights the extent to which factors beyond our control can have major ramifications, affecting not only our homes but also our tenants’ ability to live in them – Leamington’s massive fire has already forced eight people to move out of their homes so far.
Steve Barnes, Associate Director at LandlordZONE insurance partner, Hamilton Fraser Total Landlord Insurance, says: “As a landlord, no matter how much care you take over preventative measures to reduce the risks of anything going wrong in your property which could affect your tenants’ ability to live there, it’s just not possible to eliminate risk entirely.
“That’s why it’s so important to make sure you have comprehensive landlord insurance cover in place. Both our Essential and Premier policies cover loss of rent or alternative accommodation should a tenant be required to evacuate a property.”
How often do explosions force tenants to evacuate?
Explosions affecting residential properties are rare, but when they do occur it is generally due to gas leaks.
As we approach Gas Safety Week later this month (13 – 19 September), it’s important to make sure you’re compliant with gas safety regulations. Penalties for landlords who fail to comply are severe, and if a tenant dies while staying in your property due to negligence, you could be prosecuted for manslaughter and sentenced to time in prison.
Steve Barnes adds: “The best ways to prevent yourself from facing the justifiably harsh penalties for non-compliance with gas safety, are to make sure you schedule a gas safety check at least once a year and to keep a record of your Gas Safety Certificates and checks.
“If you use an agent to manage your property, make sure that your contract states who is responsible for what and that your agent provides you and your tenants with new Gas Safety Certificates on at least an annual basis. If you have any questions about how gas safety might affect your insurance policy, feel free to contact our team on 0800 63 43 880. Our policy will cover most eventualities but does not include incidences of faulty workmanship or any pre-existing defects or damage or wear and tear.”
For more information on landlords’ responsibilities for gas safety, including what to do if your tenants prevent you from carrying out a gas safety check, read Hamilton Fraser Total Landlord Insurance’s newly updated Ultimate guide to gas safety and landlord gas safety certificates.
As a valued LandlordZONE reader you’re entitled to 20% off Hamilton Fraser Total Landlord Insurance’s policies, call the team today on 0800 63 43 880 quoting code LZ2021 or get a quote online in under 4 minutes.
Pic credit: Twitter via @justynjj
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – What do landlords do if their tenants are forced to evacuate their home? | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: What do landlords do if their tenants are forced to evacuate their home?
MHCLG will not consider an exemption of the tenant fees ban for pets
Tory MP Andrew Rosindell sent a letter backed by Labour’s Andrew Gwynne, Green MP Caroline Lucas and Lib Dem leader Ed Davey to the Housing Secretary asking for the Tenants fees act Legislation to be amended and reduce unnecessarily obstacles to renters owning pets.
The post MHCLG will not consider an exemption of the tenant fees ban for pets appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: MHCLG will not consider an exemption of the tenant fees ban for pets
Tenant Referencing – who do you use for a thorough check these days?
Hello, I used to use TenantReferencing.co.uk and was very happy with their application form and their 9-point checks. They left the market some time ago, and I still haven’t found a suitable replacement thorough referencing company.
Paying for a link to be sent to a prospective tenant before I’ve assessed an application doesn’t work for me.
The post Tenant Referencing – who do you use for a thorough check these days? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Tenant Referencing – who do you use for a thorough check these days?
NEW: Live show promises ‘gloves off’ debate on rogue tenants
Visitors to the first live Property Investor Show for nearly two years are in for a treat as key members of the sector confirm they will be gathering for ‘gloves off’ sessions at the event.
This follows one of the toughest periods for the private rented sector during the pandemic, during which thousands of landlords have been prevented from evicting tenants and, particularly in England, direct financial support for those who have struggled with rent arrears has been thin on the ground.
Those appearing to fulminate on these subjects include TV star and Landlord Action founder Paul Shamplina, who will be telling landlords how to protect themselves from tenant fraud, along with leading estate agent Krstjan Byfield.
The pair recently appeared on the BBC investigative programme Inside Out when it examined the problems of rogue tenants who illegally sub-let landlords’ properties.
“There’s often a disproportionate focus on so-called rogue landlords and this tiny section of the sector tends to get huge attention,” says Shamplina (main pic).
“But I will be discussing the growing problem of bad tenants taking advantage of Airbnb popularity and how many landlords are being taken for a ride financially with dodgy individuals sub-letting properties illegally. Who should take responsibility? That’s the big question”.
Others appearing at the show include outspoken property industry figure Russell Quirk (pictured), Eddie Hooker of Hamilton Fraser, David Cox formerly of ARLA and now at Rightmove and Chris Norris, Director at the NRLA.
Quirk, who will be chairing a panel discussion on ‘what next’ for the PRS, says: “The past 18 months has seen a bumper property market and that’s benefited landlords and property investors hugely with capital gains in the double digits.
“But this surely cannot be sustained, and I will be asking the panel what they think 2022 and beyond looks like from a property value and tenant demand perspective – and adding my own perspective of course. When does the runaway train stop, if at all.”
Further big names and panel subjects are to be revealed soon.
The Property Investor Show is taking place at the Excel Centre, London on 15th and 16th October 2021.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – NEW: Live show promises ‘gloves off’ debate on rogue tenants | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: NEW: Live show promises ‘gloves off’ debate on rogue tenants
Minister rejects law reform calls to help more landlords rent to pet owners
The government has rebuffed last week’s efforts by campaigners, MPs, Lords and private rental sector organisations to help more landlords accept tenants who wish to live with their pets.
In a written House of Commons reply by junior housing minister Eddie Hughes (main picture) made in response to campaigning MP Andrew Rosindell, the government said the current deposit law set out within the Tenant Fees Act was sufficient to enable landlords to charge tenants an additional deposit.
Rosindell (pictured, left) asked: “What assessment his department has made of the potential merits of adding pet deposits to the list of permitted payments in the Tenant Fees Act 2019 for pet ownership in rented accommodation?”.
Hughes replied that: “The five week cap should be considered the maximum, rather than the default amount charged. This approach should therefore accommodate private renters who wish to keep pets, without the need for a separate pet deposit.”
The minister’s answer, which also said the government had no plans at this time to amend the Tenant Fees Act, would suggest Ministers are unaware that the vast majority of letting agents and landlords now charge the full five-week rental deposit as standard.
This means, in order to comply with Hughes’ suggestion, landlords would have to charge a lower overall deposit, something many are reluctant to do as it become more and more difficult to recoup rent arrears through the courts.
Jen Berezai (pictured) who has been helping coordinate attempts to move the government’s position on deposits, tells LandlordZONE: “The five week cap is near enough equal to a month’s rent, and should a tenant leave a property without notice or in arrears, only covers a landlord for that initial void, with nothing left over for any potential damage by humans or pets.
“Tenants WANT a negotiating tool, they WANT to be able to pay a deposit or insurance premium in order to keep their pets. The system is broken and the government MUST take heed and seriously consider the proposals set out in the Heads for Tails! report.”
Read more: ‘Tenant Fees Act has backed landlords into a corner over accepting pets’
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Minister rejects law reform calls to help more landlords rent to pet owners | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Minister rejects law reform calls to help more landlords rent to pet owners
How to put my rental property on the market?
Hi, I am sure many landlords are probably in the same situation as myself, and I am looking to now sell a rental property.
I know I have to give 4 months notice, but can I still get the property on the market before the tenant’s notice expires
The post How to put my rental property on the market? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: How to put my rental property on the market?
Buying younger children an investment?
Hi, I want to purchase a flat for cash, for my two boys (aged 15 & 13yrs). The income will take care of any maintenance and service charges as well, and the balance contributing to their ISA’s. It also gives them a place to live sometime in the future should they want to live in the city of Manchester.
The post Buying younger children an investment? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Buying younger children an investment?
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,919)
Archives
- December 2024 (46)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- NRLA slams Prime Minister for criticising landlords amid housing crisis
- Why choose The Home Insurer for landlord insurance?
- Landlords could pay tenants up to two years’ rent for failing Decent Homes Standard as PBSA is exempt
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape