Test Case – The power of Restrictive Covenants
You may own a property outright (freehold is as good as outright as you can get in England) but that doesn’t mean you can do with it exactly as you choose – not if there are any restrictive covenants attached to it.
Restrictive covenants are binding conditions that are written into a property’s deeds or sale contract as you will see in the Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd case below.
They are set by a seller to determine what a new owner can or cannot do with the land or buildings in question, under particular circumstances. They can cover a wide range of issues, but the most common examples include preventing certain actions such as:
- the making of alterations to a property – for example, extending or converting a house into multi-occupied (HMO)
- building or erecting substantial structures on the land
- operating trades or businesses on the land
- the parking of commercial vehicles, caravans, boats, trailers.
- the keeping of chickens or other livestock
- the neglect of gardens etc.
Covenants are often designed to uphold certain standards or amenities for all residents. Developers and property management companies often add restrictive covenants to prevent owners from undertaking work or other practices which would change the uniformity or otherwise have a negative impact on a neighbourhood.
Covenants may also be applied to protect value, minimise damage and retain a degree of control by the seller.
A recent case, Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd (6 November 2020) came before the Supreme Court for a judgement by Lord Burrows and with whom Lord Kerr, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin and Lord Hamblen agreed.
This is the first case in which the highest court in the land (whether the House of Lords or Supreme Court) has been required to decide an appeal on section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925. That section confers on the Upper Tribunal a power, in specified circumstances, to discharge or modify restrictive covenants affecting land.
The party in the dispute entitled to the benefit of a restrictive covenant, preventing the development of an area of open land, was the Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust. The party seeking a discharge or modification of the restrictive covenant under section 84 of the 1925 Act was Housing Solutions Ltd which is a property company concerned with the provision of affordable housing.
Housing Solutions Ltd the developer owned the land which was subject to the restrictive covenant.
The covenant was in favour of the adjoining children’s hospice owned by the Trust, that stipulated that the land could only be used as a car park. The covenant was to ensure that the hospice remained private and was not overlooked for the sake of the children.
However, in full knowledge of the covenant and of its breach, the developer nevertheless went ahead and built 13 affordable homes. It then applied to modify the covenant under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 to permit in retrospect the new development on the covenanted land.
Although the affordable housing development was deemed to be in the public’s interest, and the developer had obtained planning permission for the affordable housing, the Supreme Court held that all this did not outweigh the hospice’s contractual rights.
The court refused the application to modify the covenant – the Supreme Court reasoned that a developer should not be entitled to rely on its own unlawful conduct as a justification for the modification of a covenant.
This case demonstrates the narrowness of the ‘public interest’ test. Lord Burrows in his judgement did not place any greater weight on the fact that planning permission had been granted. The ‘public interest’ and the waste of so many dwellings was “overpowered” by the fact that the houses need not have been erected, and the contractual rights of the respondent.
This result, and the likely demolition of the affordable homes, puts out a wake-up call to anyone who thinks that covenants may be antiquated and of no account in today’s dealings. The case confirms the continuing relevance of contract law restrictions on the development of land, to be ignored by property developers, and any subsequent purchasers at their peril.
Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust (Respondent) v Housing Solutions Ltd (Appellant)
You Tube Summary by Lord Burrows https://youtu.be/sjo3BlKtX8I
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Test Case – The power of Restrictive Covenants | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Test Case – The power of Restrictive Covenants
Covid disputes: 13,132 rental deposits led to problems, reveals housing minister
Latest figures from the government show that only 0.3% of all tenancies in England and Wales led to a rental deposit dispute between them and either their landlord or letting agent during the worst of the Covid pandemic months.
During the six months up until September some 13,132 private rental sector tenancies led a dispute among the 4,174,988 deposits lodged with the three approved schemes – TDS, DPS and MyDeposits.
The figure have been released by housing minister Christopher Pincher in answer to a parliamentary questions by Labour MP Apsana Begum.
Insurance vs custodial
Pincher’s reply revealed not only the small number of tenancies that end up in dispute, but also how a majority of tenancy deposits – 52% – are protected through an insurance scheme rather than kept as cash in the bank via custodial scheme, to use the industry jargon.
But who is complaining about whom and are landlords in the dock? Research by MyDeposits for LandlordZONE shows that the vast majority of disputes arise from complaints about letting agents by a factor of three to one.
MyDeposits says it dealt with just shy of 5,000 disputes during the same period covered by the housing ministry’s data, of which 71% were about letting agents, with 21% concerning private landlords and the rest corporate landlords.
MyDeposits chief Eddie Hooker (pictured) says his company’s figures aren’t surprising because the agents “works for the landlord not the tenant” so disputes are, arguably, more likely to occur.
His scheme’s figures include closed and live cases which could have resulted in either a settlement, being declined, gone to arbitration dispute resolution or court.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Covid disputes: 13,132 rental deposits led to problems, reveals housing minister | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Covid disputes: 13,132 rental deposits led to problems, reveals housing minister
Percentage of tenants in rent arrears dropped to 11.8% in November
The percentage of tenants in rent arrears decreased during October and November, according to research from PayProp. Payment data from also shows that the typical percentage of rent in arrears fell consistently from August to November.
However, with further COVID-19 restrictions across large parts of the country set to remain in place for the foreseeable future
The post Percentage of tenants in rent arrears dropped to 11.8% in November appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Percentage of tenants in rent arrears dropped to 11.8% in November
Damages is the top cause for deposit claims not rent arrears
According to The DPS just over half of the claims made by landlords against tenancy deposits in 2020 cited a need to clean or make repairs to the property or its contents,
Costs for damage made up 27% of claims
The post Damages is the top cause for deposit claims not rent arrears appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Damages is the top cause for deposit claims not rent arrears
Is Buy To Let Worth The Effort In 2021?
Is Buy To Let still worth the effort in 2021? Property investors have faced many challenges in 2020 which have left some investors questioning whether residential buy to let is still worth the effort.
Well, it’s a question that doesn’t have a one size fits all answer.
The post Is Buy To Let Worth The Effort In 2021? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Is Buy To Let Worth The Effort In 2021?
2020: You just could not make it up!
Everything changed on the 16th March 2020, a date that will be forever famous for all the wrong reasons, when our first lockdown came in. The country was in shock, but the property market showed how resilient it was.
One positive was that the property market was able to reopen earlier than some other industries on 13th May. But landlords had to adapt quickly and learn to communicate with their tenants more than ever before.
During lockdown, I was inundated with calls from both landlords and tenants looking for advice on non- payment of rent. As tough as it was, I heard some incredible stories of landlords going above and beyond to help their tenants who had been affected by COVID and subsequently lost jobs or been furloughed.
I saw some great examples of both parties working together but, of course, there were also some tenants taking advantage of the situation.
The Government announced that lenders should be given three-month mortgage holidays, which in fact were deferrals and they encouraged landlords to pass that onto their tenants.
Evictions ban
Then of course there was the evictions ban. Courts were put on hold and notice periods extended to six months to prevent the mass threat of homelessness.
Unfortunately, this has had devastating consequences for landlords, particularly those who had cases pre-COVID, as many of these landlords have still not managed to evict their tenants. Of course, it was, and still is, important to help tenants who have lost their job, but so many landlords are struggling too.
We have numerous landlords at Landlord Action who now who have more than one year’s rent arrears, and very little chance of recovering it. The courts are due to re-open in the middle of January but now with the introduction of Tier 4, who knows when this could be extended to.
Discredit
Universal Credit has hit over 2.5 million claimants, meaning more landlords have tenants in receipt of housing benefit. Frustratingly, tenants are still being forced to wait five weeks for their first payment and are unable to set up direct payments to landlords. This totally baffles me as it puts all parties under financial strain from the outset.
In Wales, tenants can apply for the Welsh Government Tenancy Saver Loan Scheme, which enables tenants to apply for loans. These are paid directly to landlords and agents, which can be repaid for a period of up to five years. This is a great way to sustain tenancies and avoid evictions but has not been introduced in England!
We were always going to see the commercial property sector hit worse than the residential market. Working from home means thousands of offices are vacant and many are now considering whether they need that space in the future or whether their companies have adapted to a new remote way of working.
That is why, as of 8 October, British Land collected 69% of rents it was owed for the third quarter, and even less in the previous quarter.
As we move into 2021, this could present opportunities for landlords and developers buying commercial properties, looking for change of use to residential housing in 2021 under permitted development reforms. The high street in many areas will look different in the future.
I also believe a lot more landlords will consider the Social Housing market, tying up longer-term schemes with providers. Councils will now have many landlords approaching them to do deals on three or five year lets so that they have the security of a council being their tenant, rather than an individual.
Goodbye Section 21
Section 21 is definitely going and I believe it will be abolished in the next twelve months, COVID and the ongoing crisis will accelerate this, especially now that a section 21 notice period is six months which dilutes its powers.
Read this report Landlord Action has participated in called – BEYOND SECTION 21. I believe there could be as many as 150,000 claims issued in the courts in 2021.
When Rishi Sunak made the announcement of the Stamp Duty Concession until the 31st March 2021, which we know now will not be extended, we saw a frenzy of activity, in October alone we saw 97,500 house purchase loans approved. While there are over 140,000 more people in the process of buying a new home now than this time last year
But The Guild of Property Professionals carried out a survey to 1,000 buyers last week and 31% said they would ditch their potential purchase if completion takes them beyond 31 March, when the holiday is due to end, so we could be in for a tsunami of fall-throughs.
Upon speaking to our mortgage broker at Total Landlord Mortgages, Daniel Lee (pictured), mortgage applications are taking longer then ever before, conveyancers working remotely are much slower and lenders are changing lending criteria daily.
Other considerations for landlords next year will be Brexit and how this impacts landlords’ requirement to check their tenants “right to rent” and immigration status. Currently, EU citizens are considered in the same way as UK citizens but this could change after Brexit.
Finally, landlords await Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s Spring Budget which it is thought could bring a potential hike to capital gains tax. If this goes ahead, we could see a flurry of landlords trying to sell up before it comes in, which could drive prices down.
But, of course, landlords who were thinking of selling, but cannot sell in time, will hold on to their properties. There has never been a more important time for landlords to seek specialist tax advice and get their tax planning in place.
There will be opportunities for landlords next year without a doubt but now landlords must focus on being compliant and taking good care of their properties and their tenants.
From all of us at Landlord Zone, we wish you a merry Christmas and a Happy new year and see you in 2021
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – 2020: You just could not make it up! | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: 2020: You just could not make it up!
Propertymark calls for a moratorium on landlord tax increases
Top of the wish list is a call out to government to pay the rents of those affected by COVID. Landlords (and tenants) have been on a real rollercoaster ride during the pandemic this year; they even had to shut down entirely during the first lockdown and they are still suffering with many in financial hardship.
The year has been particularly tough on landlords in the private rented sector (PRS). They were already facing increasing costs as a result of various pieces of legislation brought in over recent years resulting in more paperwork, higher taxes, and overall an increase in running costs.
Although there were measures to protect landlords by way of a mortgage holiday for those with cash flow problems, there was also a ban on evictions which has hit some landlords hard, especially those with possession claims in the pipeline when the ban was announced. Some unlucky landlords are facing the prospect of a full 12 months without getting a penny in rent.
Thankfully estate and lettings agents and removal firms are allowed to continue working during the tier 4 restrictions in England and that goes for landlords as well. Following the latest UK Government announcement, those people living in a tier 4 area must not leave or be outside of their home except for where they have a specific purpose or a ‘reasonable excuse’. Moving home and associated activities within the housing sector are deemed a ‘reasonable excuse’, therefore, agents and landlords can continue to work.
Property viewings are still allowed to take place as long the COVID-19 safety guidance is followed, which includes social distancing and wearing face masks or coverings. People are still allowed to move home, but according to the guidance anyone outside an individual family bubble should not help with moving unless it’s absolutely necessary.
ARLA Properetymark’s Mark Hayward told The Guardian: that he would like to see improvements made for the sector and he mentioned his main wishes:
“It’s been an unprecedented year for not just the buy-to-let sector, but the housing sector as a whole and we’re now sat in a very different place to this time last year.
“The Government has acknowledged the important role the buy-to-let sector plays in driving forward the economy, so we’re hopeful that our wish list for the sector will come to fruition.”
The list includes calls for the Government to pay the rents for those tenants affected by coronavirus and for this payment to be made direct to landlords.
Secondly, Propertymark is calling on the government to stop increasing the tax level for landlords. There have been strong rumours of swinging increases in Capital Gains Tax, a measure if it comes to fruition, would drive out a lot of buy to let landlords.
It’s not just the tax on the gain that worries landlords, if the speculation came about the gain could be added to income from other sources such as employment and would result in pushing many more into the higher rate tax band.
Mr Hayward said:
“It is vital the negative impacts of further taxes on an already penalised sector are considered and the Government must introduce initiatives to help tenants keep the rent flowing and the courts handle eviction cases.
“Additionally, new buy-to-let landlords should be encouraged through build-to-rent schemes. All of this will help boost the sector, encourage new landlords and help the private rented sector thrive in 2021.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Propertymark calls for a moratorium on landlord tax increases | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Propertymark calls for a moratorium on landlord tax increases
What’s good and which ones to avoid?
Rather than trawling through Google play store and reading countless reviews on apps that assist with midterm inspections, I thought it would be more beneficial to learn about them first hand from other landlords and property managers who may have experiences with them.
The post What’s good and which ones to avoid? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: What’s good and which ones to avoid?
‘I’ve had to learn the hard way and won’t ever take housing benefit tenants again’
An ‘accidental landlord’ who spent years coping with terrible tenants that turned his property into a scrap metal yard is quietly celebrating their imminent eviction.
The landlord – who doesn’t want to be named for fear of retaliation – inherited a three-bedroom house in Slough from his father-in-law six years ago (pictured).
But he’s now thousands of pounds out of pocket and has vowed never to take DSS tenants again after the traveler family of six piled up at least 20 cars in the garden, where they also housed people in a caravan and refused to pay rent for years.
“They are very abusive – I was scared to speak to them and terrified about serving the eviction notice,” he tells LandlordZONE.
His tenants were supposed to pay one-third of the £1,300 rent while Housing Benefit covered the rest.
But, despite alerting Slough Borough Council to the problem years ago, it has felt like fighting a losing battle, he explains.
“The council said this family had a license for their business issued from another council, which surprised me, so I even wrote to my MP.
Section 21
He finally served a section 21 in January before the pandemic struck, only to receive a letter from Slough Council housing team saying they were going to prosecute him.
“They said I’d done the section 21 wrong, but then their enforcement team said I was doing the right thing – I was basically getting conflicting advice from different departments.”
After forking out for a solicitor and finally getting the council to understand the situation, he feels frustrated that the possession process has taken so long.
But with the help of Landlord Action, he’s finally about to serve the bailiff application and, after losing his job earlier in the pandemic, plans to move into the house with his family and rent out his one-bed flat.
Any new tenants will be carefully vetted, he adds: “I’ve always tried to do the right thing, but this experience has been so stressful that it’s taken its toll on my health. I’ve had to learn about being a landlord the hard way and won’t ever take housing benefit tenants again.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – ‘I’ve had to learn the hard way and won’t ever take housing benefit tenants again’ | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: ‘I’ve had to learn the hard way and won’t ever take housing benefit tenants again’
Landlord tax evasion rises steeply despite HMRC’s Let Property Campaign
A leading accountancy firm has claimed that landlord tax evasion on rental income has nearly doubled over the past 12 months to an average of £4,480.
The claim is made by London-based national firm UHY Hacker Young, which specialises in several business sectors including property.
The increase in tax evasion by landlords is surprising. HMRC has been leaning heavily on landlords to come clean about previous tax evasion activity recently via its ongoing Let Property Campaign.
It’s been running since 2013 and enables buy-to-let landlords and the owners of holiday homes to voluntarily disclose unpaid tax while simultaneously threatening them with huge fines if they don’t.
The campaign recently revealed said it believes that 1.5 million of the UK’s 2.5 million landlords are underpaying their tax or not paying it at all.
It has also been mailing out thousands of letters to landlords its algorithm believes may be hiding rental income from the tax authorities. It uses data gleaned from lettings agents, holiday lettings websites, bank accounts and tax returns.
Airbnb, for example, has provided HMRC with details of its 225,000 UK hosts.
Clive Gawthorpe (pictured), Partner at UHY Hacker Young, says: “When landlords who are hiding income get a warning letter from HMRC, they realise that HMRC is closing in on them and [that] they can no longer hide.
“If a landlord decides to come forward under the campaign, it’s better to do it with professional advice, particularly if their tax affairs are complex. This will be key in helping avoid any mistakes and the possibility of further investigations by HMRC.”
Get more information about tax compliance.
Read more about HMRC’s landlord taxing activities.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Landlord tax evasion rises steeply despite HMRC’s Let Property Campaign | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Landlord tax evasion rises steeply despite HMRC’s Let Property Campaign
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’