Councils to fine landlords £7,000 per hazard under new health and safety rules
Property118

Councils to fine landlords £7,000 per hazard under new health and safety rules
Landlords could face on-the-spot fines of £7,000 for each hazard found in a property and a £40,000 civil penalty for failing to remedy the issue and continuing to breach the new health and safety standards.
The government has announced changes to the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS), which will come into force on 23 June.
The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) has urged landlords to carry out regular inspections of their properties to make sure they are hazard-free.
Health and safety risks
The HHSRS system is used by local authorities in England and Wales to assess potential health and safety risks in homes.
The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) explains on its website that, under new rules introduced through the Renters’ Rights Act, any hazard identified during a local authority inspection will now be categorised as high, medium or low risk, replacing the more complex A–J rating system.
High-risk hazards, known as Category 1 hazards, will continue to trigger a council’s duty to take enforcement action against landlords, although councils will retain discretion over how they deal with medium- and low-risk hazards, known as Category 2 hazards.
The NRLA says that while the list of hazards is not changing, some categories are being merged. These include Falls on the Level, which covers falls associated with toilets, baths and showers, as well as trip hazards and falls on level surfaces, and Fire and Explosions, which covers exposure to uncontrolled fire, smoke and fumes, and explosions.
Range of factors to decide fines
Under draft guidance published by the government, councils will be able to fine landlords £7,000 per Category One hazard identified, or opt to impose a single £7,000 civil penalty for multiple breaches.
In the guidance, it explains that councils can decide the level of fines by assessing a range of factors, but that decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis.
The guidance says: “Local housing authorities need to have a policy basis to guide their decisions on when to issue a civil penalty.
“Each decision is to be considered on a case-by-case basis in line with that policy. Civil penalties under section 6A of the Act can only be imposed when, in the opinion of the local housing authority, it would have been reasonably practicable for the responsible person to secure the removal of the hazard.
Factors that a local housing authority should take into account when determining whether removal would have been reasonably practicable include:
- how long the responsible person has known about the existence of the hazard;
- whether practical steps could have been taken to remedy the hazard without disproportionate expense or disruption;
- what steps the responsible person has taken to remove the hazard or reduce its impact, including any efforts made to secure the services of specialist tradespeople;
- whether permission from other parties is needed to remove the hazard and the steps the responsible person has taken to secure that permission; and
- whether tenants have provided access to the property in order for remedial works to be carried out.
Landlords must carry out inspections
The NRLA is urging landlords to document safety checks and inspect properties regularly to comply with the new health and safety regulations.
The industry body says on its website: “If landlords are complying with all current health and safety guidance under the HHSRS, landlords don’t need to do anything fundamentally different.
“However, landlords must continue to carry out regular inspections of their properties to make sure they are hazard-free and safe for tenants to live in.
“Documenting these, and other safety checks, is also essential when it comes to proving landlords are taking their health and safety responsibilities seriously.
“Landlords should also be sure to log and action any reports or complaints from tenants when it comes to potential hazards and keep a record of any remedial work carried out by themselves or tradespeople.”
The post Councils to fine landlords £7,000 per hazard under new health and safety rules appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Councils to fine landlords £7,000 per hazard under new health and safety rules
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (12,755)
Archives
- June 2026 (32)
- May 2026 (70)
- April 2026 (78)
- March 2026 (72)
- February 2026 (55)
- January 2026 (52)
- December 2025 (62)
- August 2025 (51)
- July 2025 (51)
- June 2025 (49)
- May 2025 (50)
- April 2025 (48)
- March 2025 (54)
- February 2025 (51)
- January 2025 (52)
- December 2024 (55)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Why rent controls are the wrong answer to a housing shortage
- Councils to fine landlords £7,000 per hazard under new health and safety rules
- The RRA’s ‘unintended consequences’ for landlords and tenants
- Stuck between a rock and a hard place when selling a tenanted property?
- House prices rise 1.6% as London falls – e.surv

admin