Bank of England split as three policymakers push for rate hike
Property118

Bank of England split as three policymakers push for rate hike
In a divided vote, the Bank of England has held interest rates at 3.75%.
The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) narrowly voted 6-3 to keep the Bank Rate unchanged.
Three members voted to increase the Bank Rate by 0.25 percentage points, to 4%.
Energy prices have remained volatile
The MPC said of its decision: “In response to events in the Middle East, crude and refined energy prices have remained volatile and higher than pre-conflict. The impact of the energy shock on the UK economy remains uncertain.
“CPI inflation has fallen to 2.6% since the previous meeting, although it is expected to rise later this year as the effects of higher energy prices continue to pass through. The risk of material second-round effects in price and wage-setting, against which policy needs to lean, is greater the longer higher energy prices persist.
“There is little evidence so far to suggest such effects, and there have continued to be clear signs of underlying disinflation in recent data.”
Industry reaction
Samuel Fuller, director at Financial Markets Online, said: “The Bank of England’s hawks are doubling down. Three members of the Committee voted for an immediate increase in interest rates, one more than did so in June.
“Their militancy is reflected in the Committee’s minutes, which talk tough about the Bank’s willingness to act decisively to cool inflation.
“While CPI has come in under expectation for three months in a row, and sank back to a 15-month low in June, the Bank is on alert in case the energy shock drives secondary inflation.
“In recent weeks, markets had begun to predict that the Bank would be content to leave interest rates unchanged for the rest of the year.
“That bet may now change as the Bank’s minutes suggest it has refined its stance from ‘watch and wait’ to ‘watch and wait with a big stick’.
“While this means no immediate change for savers, we’re likely to see mortgage interest rates tick back up in coming weeks. With America’s on-off war with Iran now into its sixth month, continued volatility and lingering inflationary pressure have tipped the Bank into more hawkish territory and UK equities and mortgage borrowers could be the biggest losers.”
Nathan Emerson, CEO at Propertymark, said: “By holding interest rates, the Bank of England has opted for a measured approach as inflation remains above its 2 per cent target. While price pressures have eased in recent months, today’s decision reflects the need to ensure inflation continues moving in the right direction before further policy changes are considered.
“A stable base rate provides greater certainty for the housing market. It gives lenders more confidence to continue offering competitive mortgage products while allowing buyers to make informed financial decisions. Savers also continue to benefit from relatively attractive returns on savings, helping some prospective homeowners build towards a deposit.
“However, inflationary pressures have not disappeared. Higher household costs, including July’s increase in the energy price cap, alongside ongoing uncertainty in global energy markets, mean the Bank of England is likely to continue taking a cautious, data-led approach over the coming months.”
Hina Bhudia, Partner, Knight Frank Finance, said: “The MPC has turned a little more hawkish since the previous meeting, with three members voting to raise the base rate, which is unsurprising given the escalation of hostilities in the Middle East. Mortgage lenders have already repriced higher to account for this, so borrowers should enjoy some stability in the short term.
“That said, the outlook for mortgage rates over the coming months remains highly uncertain. Much will depend on developments in the Middle East and whether higher energy prices feed through into broader inflation at a time when demand across the economy remains relatively subdued. Many lenders are behind their targets for the year and will pass on to borrowers any reduction in funding costs as soon as they can.”
Colleen Babcock, property expert at Rightmove said: “There’s stability for now as the Bank of England holds its Base Rate as widely expected. We’ve seen average mortgage rates increase over the last few weeks as geopolitical tensions have escalated, and the average two-year fixed rate is currently coming it at 5.11%.
“For broader context, this is up from 4.25% before the war in Iran started, but down from around 5.43% at the peak of tensions in April. For home-movers, rates remain elevated which continues to stretch affordability. However, while rates are high, they’re also relatively steady, which helps movers to plan and make decisions.
“Even relatively small changes in mortgage rates can have a noticeable impact on monthly repayments, particularly for first-time buyers, so any downwards movement in rates during the second half of this year would be very welcome.”
The post Bank of England split as three policymakers push for rate hike appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Bank of England split as three policymakers push for rate hike
Government admits no assessment of burden facing landlords
Property118

Government admits no assessment of burden facing landlords
The government has confirmed it carried out no assessment of the combined impact of landlord tax hikes and Renters’ Rights Act reforms.
In a written parliamentary answer, Baroness Taylor of Stevenage said the government had made “no single assessment” of the cumulative costs landlords will face from the Renters’ Rights Act alongside planned tax changes.
No single assessment
In a written parliamentary question, Lord Truscott asked: “What assessment the government have made of the combined cost of new regulatory measures under the Renters’ Rights Act in addition to proposed tax increases for the average landlord”.
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage said: “My department has made no single assessment covering the combined cost of the measures in the Renters’ Rights Act and proposed tax increases.
“Last year’s Budget, the government announced a 2ppt increase to the rate of property income to be introduced from April 2027. This is to help narrow the gap between taxes paid on work and paid on income from assets. An assessment of this policy was published in a Tax Information and Impact Note.”
In the impact notice, it claims the 2ppt increase would be “negligible”.
It said: “By 2029 to 2030, 2.4 million landlords (6% of taxpayers in 2029 to 2030) will face an increase in tax as a result of this measure. Administratively, this measure will affect individuals (including partners in partnerships) with profits from property rental income. It is anticipated that both the one-off and ongoing administrative burdens for these individuals will be negligible.”
Hit renters and landlords
However, industry figures have previously warned that the combined impact of rising taxation and increased regulation could push more landlords to exit the private rented sector.
Jonathan Stinton, head of mortgage relations at Coventry Building Society, said: “Hiking property income tax won’t just hit landlords, it will hit renters in the pocket too. When the cost of being a landlord rises, those pressures almost always find their way into monthly rents, meaning those who don’t own a home pay the price.
“A similar rise to tax on dividends means the cost will also go up for landlords who hold their property in a limited company.
“The more landlords are taxed the less appealing it is to let a property, which could lead to fewer landlords and reduced choice for landlords. The simple but powerful forces of supply and demand would then push rents higher, making it much more difficult to rent a home. First-time buyers who are trying to save a deposit while renting could especially struggle and worry that their homeownership dreams are pushed even further out of sight.”
Sam Humphreys, head of M&A at Dwelly, said: “The rise in property income and dividends tax presents all types of landlords with yet another obstacle to adapt to at a time when they are already absorbing significant operational changes under the Renter’s Rights Act.”
The post Government admits no assessment of burden facing landlords appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Government admits no assessment of burden facing landlords
Final warning for landlords as possession deadline looms
Property118

Final warning for landlords as possession deadline looms
Landlords only have until tomorrow (31 July) to apply for court possession under Section 21 or older Section 8 notices.
When the Renters’ Rights Act came into force in May, fixed-term tenancies were abolished, and all existing Assured Shorthold Tenancies (ASTs) automatically became Assured Periodic Tenancies (APTs).
However, landlords already in the possession process could still rely on valid Section 21 or Section 8 notices served before 1 May, provided they applied to court by 31 July.
Industry bodies have urged landlords to act now, with one expert warning capacity pressures are “unlike anything seen” as landlords rush to meet the deadline.
Hard deadline with very real consequences
Paul Shamplina, founder of Landlord Action, told Property118: “The final 31 July deadline is now upon us and, for landlords whose existing notice remains valid until that date, it is a hard deadline with very real consequences.
“I have been on the phone constantly, and the capacity pressures and volume of work we are experiencing are unlike anything I have seen since starting Landlord Action.
“We have been warning landlords about this date for months, but the last-minute panic is very apparent. It is not enough simply to have served a notice or contacted a solicitor. The possession claim must be started in time, and before that can happen we need to review the paperwork and regulatory documents to ensure everything is compliant.
“Where landlords have prepared notices themselves, we frequently find missing documents or other problems that could cause the claim to fail in court.
“The pressure has become so intense that, wherever possible, we are arranging for completed claims to be hand-delivered to the courts so we know they have been received.”
Unintended consequences
Mr Shamplina warns that landlords who have left it too late will lose the opportunity to rely on their existing notice.
He explains: “Those seeking to sell may then have to begin again under the new Section 8 process using Ground 1A, subject to the relevant conditions and notice period.
“One of the unintended consequences is that some landlords who might otherwise have allowed a tenancy to continue have acted now because they feared losing the ability to recover their property.
“That means tenants are being asked to leave earlier than they might have been, which risks adding further pressure to already stretched temporary and social housing services. That is the opposite of the greater security the reforms were intended to provide.”
Industry reaction
A spokesperson for the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), warned landlords they will have to start possession proceedings again if they miss the deadline.
The spokesperson told Property118: “As many will already know, Section 21 had an accelerated possession procedure which allowed judges to base their decisions on the paperwork alone, a system that did not require a court date.
“If a landlord issued a valid Section 21 notice before 1 May 2026, they may still apply to the court for a possession order before 31 July 2026, provided it is no more than six months after service of the notice.
“It is crucial to note that if these deadlines are missed, the Section 21 notice will expire and landlords will need to start possession proceedings again under the new regulations.
“We expect these changes to have a significant impact on court wait times, with an already overloaded court system set to experience further delays due to an upsurge in the number of Section 8 court hearings brought before the courts.”
Kim Lidbury, president of ARLA Propertymark (Association of Residential Letting Agents), explains it’s important for letting agents to help landlords with the upcoming deadline.
She said: “The 31 July deadline is an important date for landlords who served a valid Section 21 or relevant Section 8 notice before the Renters’ Rights Act came into force. To rely on the previous possession process, landlords must have submitted their possession claim to the court by this date.
“Missing the deadline could mean landlords are required to pursue possession under the new legislative framework instead, which introduces different grounds, processes and requirements. This could result in additional delays, costs and uncertainty.
“Landlords who are affected should act without delay. Letting agents have a vital role to play in helping landlords understand the transitional arrangements, ensuring the correct documentation has been submitted, and providing professional advice to help clients navigate the new legal framework with confidence.
“As the sector adapts to these significant reforms, professional agents will be key to supporting compliance while helping landlords continue to provide high-quality homes for tenants.”
The post Final warning for landlords as possession deadline looms appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Final warning for landlords as possession deadline looms
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (12,940)
Archives
- September 2026 (23)
- August 2026 (61)
- July 2026 (63)
- June 2026 (70)
- May 2026 (70)
- April 2026 (78)
- March 2026 (72)
- February 2026 (55)
- January 2026 (52)
- December 2025 (62)
- August 2025 (51)
- July 2025 (51)
- June 2025 (49)
- May 2025 (50)
- April 2025 (48)
- March 2025 (54)
- February 2025 (51)
- January 2025 (52)
- December 2024 (55)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Could a new LLP tax judgment help landlords caught in HMRC’s Spotlight 63?
- Why the nonsense £65 landlord database tax is just the start
- One million landlords set to use tenant deposit alternatives
- Why September could be the month to rethink your property portfolio
- Rents look set to rise as tenant demand grows – RICS

admin