Sadiq Khan unveils plan to tackle overheating in homes
Property118

Sadiq Khan unveils plan to tackle overheating in homes
The Mayor of London has announced measures to tackle overheating in homes.
Sadiq Khan has unveiled the Heat Ready London plan, which will require new-build homes to be designed to reduce the risk of overheating
The news comes as landlords will need to meet EPC C targets by 2030.
One million homes at risk of overheating
According to data by the London Assembly, more than one million homes may be at high risk of overheating.
Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said the plan will help the capital adapt to rising temperatures:
He said: “Rising temperatures are no longer a future threat, they are becoming a growing reality for Londoners. It is affecting our communities, from homes and high streets to schools, hospitals and care services.
“That is why I am proud to unveil Heat Ready London, London’s first-ever heat plan. This is a new vision that will help tackle the huge obstacles we face with rising temperatures.
“No single organisation can address the scale of the challenge alone, so this is a call to action to our partners to use this framework to drive collective delivery so we can protect lives and strengthen the resilience of our city.”
Risk of indoor overheating
Under the plans, Mr Khan said London is already tackling overheating through the London Plan, which requires new homes to be designed to stay cooler in hot weather using measures such as shading, ventilation and smarter design, helping to reduce the need for energy-intensive cooling.
The Mayor added: “Addressing overheating in much of London’s existing housing is a key priority and will require coordinated action across government, councils and the housing sector to keep Londoners safe and comfortable as temperatures rise”.
Under the Heat Ready London plan, this will include retrofitting the highest-risk homes to reduce the risk of indoor overheating and protect the most vulnerable, particularly in high-risk areas.
The post Sadiq Khan unveils plan to tackle overheating in homes appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Sadiq Khan unveils plan to tackle overheating in homes
Head of landlord group slams claims of “greedy landlords” in deposit row
Property118

Head of landlord group slams claims of “greedy landlords” in deposit row
The head of a landlord association has hit back at the accusation of “greedy landlords clinging on to tenants’ money” through deposits.
An article in the Big Issue by Generation Rent claims landlords can make “unreasonable deductions to encourage renters to settle so they can get back at least some of their money sooner.”
However, the chief executive of the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), Ben Beadle, posted on X, formerly Twitter, calling Generation Rent’s comments “unhelpful nonsense”.
Government plans to remove insured deposit schemes
The government have previously announced potential changes to the tenancy deposit protection system, including plans to remove insured deposit schemes.
Under the Renters’ Rights Act, landlords must place a tenant’s deposit in a government-approved tenancy deposit scheme such as the Deposit Protection Service (DPS), MyDeposits or the Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS).
Custodial schemes hold the tenant’s deposit with an independent protection provider for the duration of the tenancy. Insured schemes allow landlords or letting agents to keep the deposit themselves, backed by insurance through an approved protection provider.
Under the proposed reforms, letting agents and landlords would no longer be permitted to hold tenants’ deposits in their own bank accounts, with all deposits instead required to be held in custodial tenancy deposit protection schemes.
Structure of system makes it easy for greedy landlords
Generation Rent has welcomed the government’s potential changes to abolish insurance-backed schemes and claims the current system is unfair to tenants.
Writing in the Big Issue, Dan Wilson Craw, deputy chief executive of Generation Rent, said: “The structure of the protection system makes it easier for greedy landlords and letting agents to cling on to as much of their tenant’s money as they can.
“Landlords can choose to either lodge the deposit money with the scheme itself for free (known as the custodial system) or pay a fee to insure the cash while holding on to it themselves (the insurance-backed system). All three schemes offer this choice.
“Some insurance schemes set a time limit for tenants to request their deposit back at the end of the tenancy, and also don’t require landlords to pay undisputed money to the tenant while a dispute is being adjudicated.
“This gives landlords leverage to make unreasonable deductions and encourage renters to settle so they can get back at least some of their money sooner. Of course, for many of us, having just moved home, getting out of our overdraft is paramount, so we can be bounced into giving up some of our money as long as we get enough of it returned quickly.
“In extreme cases, landlords can drag their feet so much that once the deadline has passed, it’s too late to raise a formal dispute, and the landlord pockets it all.”
He added: “Last year we recommended a range of measures that would encourage renters to challenge unfair deposit claims and reunite them with their money more quickly after moving out, including the abolition of insurance-backed schemes.
“The government has listened and is now carrying out a reprocurement process for deposit protection, proposing a single provider and only the custodial system of protection.
“Letting agents are not happy about losing their insurance option, and until the tender is finalised, it’s not a done deal. While the details are being worked out, we want the government to spell out to bidders that delayed return of deposits is unacceptable.
“It should be the landlord’s responsibility, not the tenant’s, to make a claim on the deposit if they have the grounds, and to do this within two weeks of the tenancy’s end, or the scheme returns the cash to the tenant.”
Unhelpful nonsense
However, chief executive of the NRLA, Ben Beadle slammed Generation Rent’s comments and said most tenants gain back their deposit.
He said on X, formerly Twitter: “Unhelpful nonsense on landlords holding deposits ‘hostage’, but there is certainly an opportunity to reform the deposit system, which has worked well since its introduction 19 years ago, and I’d support this, having been involved in the scheme’s roll out from 2008.
“But there’s nothing dodgy about the insured scheme. For many tenants, they will get their money back far quicker than through the custodial scheme and undisputed deposits are already required to be returned within 10 days of agreement, but there is certainly an opportunity to speed timeframes up.
“Most ‘greedy landlords’ value their time and sanity rather than arguing the toss over a few quid in a deposit. That’s if they bother taking one at all. Which is why some sensible reforms would be welcome.”
He added: “If I were radical, I’d scrap the current way of thinking and have deposits tenant led. Tenant selects the scheme and lodges the money, tells the landlord, landlord makes a claim if they need to within 10 days of tenancy ending , or it goes back to the tenant. Job done.”
The post Head of landlord group slams claims of “greedy landlords” in deposit row appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Head of landlord group slams claims of “greedy landlords” in deposit row
Landlords to face new digital verification rules for Right to Rent checks
Property118

Landlords to face new digital verification rules for Right to Rent checks
Mandatory right to rent checks for registered digital verification will come into force on 1 October.
The government has announced that secondary legislation introduced this week will make it mandatory for landlords who opt to carry out Right to Rent checks electronically to use a registered digital verification provider (RtR DVSP).
Right to Rent rules were introduced in England under the Immigration Act 2014. They require landlords to verify the immigration status of prospective tenants before a tenancy begins, ensuring they have the legal right to rent property in the UK.
Landlords have a number of options
The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) writes on its website that the government is keen to move to a fully digital immigration system.
The association said: “Landlords have a number of options when it comes to carrying out the checks and can either carry out a manual right to rent check, using hard copy documents, a Home Office online right to rent check or a virtual right to rent check using a RtR DVSP.
“The government is keen to move to a fully digital immigration system and started issuing eVisas in 2018. Landlords whose tenants have eVisas are able to evidence their right to rent using the Home Office online service.”
Facial recognition technology
In the government’s code of practice for landlords and agents on right to rent checks, a registered digital verification provider (RtR DVSP) can verify the following documents:
- A valid British or Irish passport, including an Irish passport card, provided it expired no more than six months ago.
- Acceptable documents from List A and List B, where they have been provided to the RtR DVSP by, or on behalf of, the issuing authority in a digital format.
The code also says RtR DVSPs can use facial recognition technology to help landlords confirm that the occupier is the same individual whose Right to Rent check has been carried out.
It adds: “If the landlord wishes to use facial recognition technology, this must be carried out using a RtR DVSP. The RtR DVSP will provide a comparison verifying the image on the document and the match to the individual. Landlords must retain a copy of this comparison securely alongside a copy of the document checked. The landlord must provide the occupier with a reasonable opportunity to verify their identity if the technology is unable to verify the images.
“You must retain a clear copy of the check for the duration of the tenancy and for one year after the tenancy has come to an end.”
As previously reported by Property118, an industry body is urging the Home Office to simplify Right to Rent guidance for landlords and letting agents.
Propertymark is calling on the government to provide a shorter checklist for landlords, arguing that the current Right to Rent guidance is “too long”.
The post Landlords to face new digital verification rules for Right to Rent checks appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Landlords to face new digital verification rules for Right to Rent checks
Tenant demand drives up rents – Aldermore
Property118

Tenant demand drives up rents – Aldermore
Rents continue to rise as government legislation puts pressure on landlords, according to new research.
Data by Aldermore reveal two out of three renters are paying more rent than expected as tenant demand continues to surge.
The news comes as the Renters’ Rights Act came into force on 1 May 2026.
Surge in tenant demand
According to the data, nearly two-thirds (63%) say they ended up paying more rent than they initially intended when securing their current home.
A similar proportion (62%) say they were competing with more prospective tenants than expected when trying to secure a rental property.
Six in ten (60%) say they found it difficult to secure a suitable property, while more than half (55%) experienced a longer search process than expected.
The average tenancy length has also edged up to 4.5 years. However, the picture is more challenging for those on the move, with nearly a quarter (23%) of renters moving home in the last year.
Landlords are having to adapt
Jon Cooper, director of mortgages at Aldermore, explains with additional regulation for landlords, many are having to adapt.
He said: “Our latest Buy to Let Index shows that while many renters are staying in their homes for longer, those looking to move are still facing a highly competitive market. Many are finding they need to pay more than they originally expected, and in some cases expand their search to previously unthought-of areas just to secure a suitable home.
“At the same time, the operating environment for landlords has become more complex, which threatens to place pressure on the number of available rental properties. Increased regulation and wider economic pressures mean many landlords are having to adapt how they manage their properties and finances.
“To avoid exacerbating the current challenge facing renters, the focus must be on maintaining sufficient supply in the private rental sector, to support affordability and give renters greater choice and mobility.”
The data also reveals two out of five renters (41%) say they had to move to a different area because there were no affordable rental properties where they wanted to live, while over a third (36%) moved further away from work, family or support networks.
The post Tenant demand drives up rents – Aldermore appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Tenant demand drives up rents – Aldermore
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (12,880)
Archives
- August 2026 (24)
- July 2026 (63)
- June 2026 (70)
- May 2026 (70)
- April 2026 (78)
- March 2026 (72)
- February 2026 (55)
- January 2026 (52)
- December 2025 (62)
- August 2025 (51)
- July 2025 (51)
- June 2025 (49)
- May 2025 (50)
- April 2025 (48)
- March 2025 (54)
- February 2025 (51)
- January 2025 (52)
- December 2024 (55)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Just as landlords predicted – rents are going up
- Buy to let mortgage possessions fall
- Buy-to-let arrears are down 26%, so why are landlord possession claims rising?
- Why thousands of landlords could be missing their best-selling option
- New buy to let mortgage rates from 3.55%

admin