Jul
6

Section 8 Possession and Disability Discrimination: The Defence Landlords Can’t Afford to Ignore

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

Section 8 Possession and Disability Discrimination: The Defence Landlords Can’t Afford to Ignore

Most landlords understand that the abolition of Section 21 has fundamentally changed the possession process.

What many don’t yet appreciate is that another challenge may become increasingly common as more landlords rely on Section 8 grounds for possession: disability discrimination.

According to barrister Sonia Rai, speaking with Paul Shamplina of Landlord Action, in the article How the Equality Act 2010 is reshaping eviction strategy in the post-Section 21 landscape, many private landlords remain unaware of how disability discrimination can be raised as a defence to possession proceedings or as a counterclaim for damages.

With Section 21 now gone and landlords relying more heavily on rent arrears and anti-social behaviour grounds, she believes these arguments are likely to become far more common.

If she’s right, it could significantly change the risks involved in taking possession action.

Why landlords should pay attention

Many landlords assume that if a tenant owes enough rent, or if the evidence of anti-social behaviour is strong, possession will simply follow.

Unfortunately, it isn’t always that straightforward.

Under the Equality Act 2010, tenants who have a disability may argue that the rent arrears or behaviour leading to possession arose because of that disability.

The court must then consider whether seeking possession is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, or whether there were other reasonable steps the landlord could have taken first.

The definition of disability is also much broader than many landlords realise. It covers physical and mental impairments that have a substantial and long-term impact on day-to-day activities and may include conditions such as ADHD, mental health conditions and many long-term illnesses.

Medical evidence is frequently produced to support these claims and, as discussed in the podcast, obtaining expert evidence to challenge them can itself become expensive.

It’s not just about discrimination

One of the most important points raised in the discussion is that landlords do not have to discriminate for problems to arise intentionally.

Instead, the court may ask questions such as:

  • Did the landlord try to understand why the rent arrears had developed?
  • Did they contact the tenant to discuss what was happening?
  • Could direct payment of benefits have been arranged?
  • Could a repayment plan have been explored?
  • Would a discretionary possession claim have been more appropriate than relying solely on a mandatory ground?

In other words, the court may look beyond the existence of the arrears themselves and examine whether possession was the only reasonable course of action.

The case every landlord should know about

A case discussed during the podcast illustrates just how dramatically a possession claim can change.

In Radcliffe and Paterson, heard in the County Court in March 2020, the landlords sought possession using Grounds 8, 10 and 11 after rent arrears exceeded £8,000.

On the face of it, the claim appeared straightforward. It wasn’t.

Miss Paterson responded with three counterclaims:

  • damages for failure to provide the prescribed tenancy information;
  • damages for disrepair;
  • damages for disability discrimination.

The court awarded:

  • £2,850 for the prescribed information breach;
  • £3,907 for disrepair (including the usual uplift);
  • £2,000 for disability discrimination.

The total award came to just under £9,000 so instead of Miss Paterson owing the landlords more than £8,000 in rent arrears, they ended up owing her almost £1,000.

The court also decided it would be unreasonable to make a possession order.

The court accepted medical evidence showing that Miss Paterson’s rent arrears had arisen as a consequence of her various health conditions. Importantly, it also concluded that seeking possession on a mandatory basis was disproportionate because the landlords had other options available.

These included requesting direct payment, arranging a meeting with the tenant and considering a discretionary approach before issuing proceedings.

In addition, landlords who lose possession proceedings or significant elements of them may also become liable for legal costs, depending on the court’s decision.

Future awards could be much higher

Perhaps the most sobering point raised by Sonia Rai was that the £2,000 disability discrimination award in the Paterson case may now be considered relatively modest.

Compensation for discrimination is assessed using the Vento guidelines. From April 2025, the lowest band ranges from £1,200 to £12,100, with middle-band awards reaching £36,400, and the most serious cases attracting awards of up to £60,700.

That does not mean every successful claim will attract damages anywhere near those figures. It does, however, illustrate that discrimination claims have the potential to become significantly more expensive than many landlords realise.

An Alternative Option: Voluntary Deed of Surrender

An interesting example of this approach appeared recently on Property118.

Responding to a landlord whose HMO tenant had built up significant rent arrears, Landlord Sales Agency’s David Coughlin suggested something that many landlords instinctively dislike: the benefits of negotiation and arranging a voluntary Deed of Surrender before rushing into court.

That might mean agreeing to write off part of the arrears, helping the tenant relocate or offering a financial incentive if it brings the matter to a conclusion more quickly.

At first glance, that advice can seem counterproductive. However, viewed alongside the Radcliffe and Paterson case, the reasoning becomes much clearer.

If disability later becomes part of the dispute, the court may ask exactly the same question David’s advice addresses: What reasonable alternatives were considered before possession proceedings were started?

And when it avoids months of further arrears, expensive litigation, counterclaims and the uncertainty of court proceedings, it may prove to be the lowest-risk commercial decision.

For landlords already considering how to exit the private rented sector, that is another reason why agreeing a sale before trying to obtain vacant possession can sometimes make far more financial sense than pursuing the traditional route.

As disability discrimination arguments become more common following the abolition of Section 21, that calculation may begin to change.

The cost of getting it wrong may no longer be measured simply in months of lost rent, but in counterclaims, damages, legal costs and the possibility that possession is refused altogether.

The Importance of Impartial Brokers  

The abolition of Section 21 has undoubtedly changed the landscape, and for some landlords, eviction will still be the correct route – but for many others, it may simply be the most expensive, stressful and time-consuming route.

David Coughlin, says: “The Renters’ Rights Act has changed the process, but it hasn’t stopped us selling properties. Most successful sales come down to finding practical solutions that work for the buyer, seller and tenant. Every tenanted property we have sold since May 1st has either been sold with the tenant remaining in situ, or the tenant has left after voluntarily agreeing a Deed of Surrender.”

If you’re holding onto a property because you think tenants, licensing issues, compliance concerns or below-market rents make it impossible to sell, don’t make the mistake of assuming eviction is your only option.

Every week we help landlords solve problems that other agents won’t even touch, finding practical solutions that work for sellers, buyers and tenants alike.

Our success come in part from being the hardest working team there is and partly because the tenants trust us as an impartial broker. They understood that our role is not to pursue our own agenda, but simply to find a practical solution that works for everyone involved.

Before you spend months navigating Section 8, court delays and ongoing compliance risks, speak to Landlord Sales Agency and discover what your options really are. You may be far closer to taking back control than you think.

Contact us today using the form below for a free, no-obligation chat to find out what we can do for you.

(function(){var el=document.getElementById(“ts-607776b5-3f7b-431c-b5cc-fc304603fee3″);if(!el)return;var b=document.body,h=document.documentElement;var dark=b.classList.contains(“dark-mode”)||b.classList.contains(“dark”)||b.classList.contains(“night-mode”)||h.classList.contains(“dark”);if(!dark){var bg=window.getComputedStyle(b).backgroundColor,m=bg.match(/d+/g);if(m)dark=(m[0]*0.299+m[1]*0.587+m[2]*0.114)<128;}el.setAttribute("data-theme",dark?"dark":"light");if(window.turnstile&&el.childElementCount===0){try{window.turnstile.render(el,{sitekey:el.getAttribute("data-sitekey"),theme:el.getAttribute("data-theme")});}catch(e){}}})();

(function(){
var uid = “crm-form-ba09a29b”;
var form = document.getElementById(uid + ‘-form’);
var wrap = document.getElementById(uid);
var msg = wrap.querySelector(‘.crm-message’);
var totalPages = 1;
var curPage = 0;

// ── Conditional logic ────────────────────────────────────────────────
var condMap = {};

function getFieldValue(fieldId) {
var els = form.querySelectorAll(‘[name=”‘ + fieldId + ‘”], [name=”‘ + fieldId + ‘[]”]’);
if (!els.length) return ”;
var first = els[0];
if (first.type === ‘checkbox’ || first.type === ‘radio’) {
var checked = [];
els.forEach(function(el){ if (el.checked) checked.push(el.value); });
return checked.join(‘,’);
}
return first.value;
}

function evalRule(rule) {
var val = getFieldValue(rule.fieldId);
var cmp = rule.value;
switch (rule.operator) {
case ‘is': return val === cmp;
case ‘isnot': return val !== cmp;
case ‘greaterthan': return parseFloat(val) > parseFloat(cmp);
case ‘lessthan': return parseFloat(val) < parseFloat(cmp);
case 'contains': return val.indexOf(cmp) !== -1;
case 'startswith': return val.indexOf(cmp) === 0;
case 'endswith': return val.slice(-cmp.length) === cmp;
default: return false; // fail closed — mirror the CRM shared matcher
}
}

function applyConditionals() {
Object.keys(condMap).forEach(function(fieldId) {
var cond = condMap[fieldId];
var rules = cond.rules || [];
var match = cond.logicType === 'any'
? rules.some(evalRule)
: rules.every(evalRule);
var show = cond.actionType === 'show' ? match : !match;
var wrapper = form.querySelector('[data-field-id="' + fieldId + '"]');
if (!wrapper) {
var el = form.querySelector('[name="' + fieldId + '"], [name="' + fieldId + '[]"]');
if (el) wrapper = el.closest('.crm-field, .crm-half');
}
if (wrapper) wrapper.style.display = show ? '' : 'none';
});
}

form.addEventListener('change', applyConditionals);
form.addEventListener('input', applyConditionals);
applyConditionals();

// ── Required-field validation (Next + Submit) ────────────────────────
// Validate from the form's field config (id + type), NOT the [required]
// HTML attribute: a checkbox group can't carry a meaningful `required`
// (native means "tick every box"), so attribute checks skip it — which is
// why empty checkbox questions slipped past Next straight to submit.
var crmRequired = [{"id":"c364951b-ecb0-4a12-bfa4-9dbe564310e8","type":"name","label":"Name"},{"id":"910107df-b8a8-4541-879f-541cef9449e4","type":"email","label":"Email"},{"id":"3b317ed9-d327-4fe2-b92e-67efede67e6d","type":"phone","label":"Phone"},{"id":"c6fae2f0-c335-452b-aa03-2cc066163d71","type":"textarea","label":"Please give us details of how we can help and the properties in question"},{"id":"34c27d9f-b3d1-4a6d-b720-24000e9fa468","type":"checkbox","label":"Privacy Policy"}];
function crmWrapper(id) {
var w = form.querySelector('[data-field-id="' + id + '"]');
if (!w) { var el = form.querySelector('[name="' + id + '"], [name="' + id + '[]"]'); if (el) w = el.closest('.crm-field, .crm-half'); }
return w;
}
function crmFilled(fld) {
var els = form.querySelectorAll('[name="' + fld.id + '"], [name="' + fld.id + '[]"]');
if (!els.length) return true;
if (['checkbox','radio','product','consent'].indexOf(fld.type) !== -1) { return Array.prototype.some.call(els, function(el){ return el.checked; }); }
return (els[0].value || '').trim() !== '';
}
function crmFirstInvalid(pageIdx) {
for (var i = 0; i < crmRequired.length; i++) {
var fld = crmRequired[i]; var w = crmWrapper(fld.id);
if (!w) continue;
if (w.style.display === 'none') continue;
if (pageIdx != null) { var pd = w.closest('[data-page]'); if (!pd || parseInt(pd.getAttribute('data-page')) !== pageIdx) continue; }
if (!crmFilled(fld)) return fld;
}
return null;
}
// Shows the error in a red box UNDER the field, matching the form's own
// .crm-message error styling, and scrolls to it.
function crmMarkError(w, text) {
if (!w) return;
var e = w.querySelector('.crm-inline-error');
if (!e) { e = document.createElement('div'); e.className = 'crm-inline-error'; w.appendChild(e); }
e.style.cssText = 'background:#fee2e2;color:#991b1b;padding:.55rem .75rem;border-radius:4px;margin-top:.4rem;font-size:.9rem';
e.textContent = text || 'Please answer this before continuing.';
}
function crmClearError(w) { if (!w) return; var e = w.querySelector('.crm-inline-error'); if (e) e.parentNode.removeChild(e); }
function crmReportInvalid(fld) {
var w = crmWrapper(fld.id);
var t = (['checkbox','product'].indexOf(fld.type) !== -1) ? 'Please select at least one option.' : (fld.type === 'radio' ? 'Please choose an option.' : 'Please fill this in.');
crmMarkError(w, t);
if (w && w.scrollIntoView) w.scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth', block: 'center' });
}
form.addEventListener('change', function(e){ var w = e.target && e.target.closest ? e.target.closest('.crm-field, .crm-half, [data-field-id]') : null; if (w) crmClearError(w); });
form.addEventListener('input', function(e){ var w = e.target && e.target.closest ? e.target.closest('.crm-field, .crm-half, [data-field-id]') : null; if (w) crmClearError(w); });

// ── Multi-page navigation ────────────────────────────────────────────

// ── Submit ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
var submitBtn = form.querySelector('button[type=submit]');
var btnText = submitBtn ? submitBtn.textContent : 'Submit';

var crmApiUrl = "https://p118-crm-api.accent.sh";

function collectFormData() {
var data = {};
for (var j = 0; j < form.elements.length; j++) {
var el = form.elements[j];
if (!el.name) continue;
if (el.type === 'file') continue; // handled by uploadFiles()
if (el.type === 'radio' && !el.checked) continue;
if (el.type === 'checkbox') {
if (!el.checked) continue;
var k = el.name.replace('[]','');
data[k] = data[k] ? data[k].concat([el.value]) : [el.value];
} else {
data[el.name] = el.value;
}
}
// Repeater fields: sub-inputs are named "[][]”.
// Group those flat keys into an array of row objects under the repeater
// id. Plain fields, checkbox “[]” arrays and single-bracket composites
// (name[first], address[city]) don’t match the double-bracket pattern, so
// ordinary submissions are unchanged.
var _repRe = /^(.+?)[(d+)][(.+)]$/;
var _repIds = {};
Object.keys( data ).forEach( function ( key ) {
var m = key.match( _repRe );
if ( ! m ) { return; }
var rid = m[1], row = parseInt( m[2], 10 ), sub = m[3];
_repIds[ rid ] = true;
if ( ! Array.isArray( data[ rid ] ) ) { data[ rid ] = []; }
if ( ! data[ rid ][ row ] || typeof data[ rid ][ row ] !== ‘object’ ) { data[ rid ][ row ] = {}; }
data[ rid ][ row ][ sub ] = data[ key ];
delete data[ key ];
} );
Object.keys( _repIds ).forEach( function ( rid ) {
if ( Array.isArray( data[ rid ] ) ) {
data[ rid ] = data[ rid ].filter( function ( r ) { return r && typeof r === ‘object'; } );
}
} );
// GF auto-substituted {user_agent} / {referer} on hidden fields
// at render time. We do the equivalent right before submit so
// fields whose default value carries these placeholders
// resolve to the browser’s actual values rather than being
// stored as literal “{user_agent}” / “{referer}” strings.
// The last ARTICLE the visitor read (set client-side on post views by
// P118_Article_Views). Used to attribute the enquiry to the article
// even after navigating away or with a stripped/absent referer.
var lastPost = ”;
try {
var lpm = document.cookie.match(/(?:^|;s*)p118_last_post=([^;]+)/);
if (lpm) lastPost = decodeURIComponent(lpm[1]);
} catch (e) {}
var subs = {
‘{user_agent}': navigator.userAgent || ”,
// Prefer the last article read; fall back to the (lossy) HTTP referer.
‘{referer}': lastPost || document.referrer || ”,
‘{last_post}': lastPost || ”,
‘{embed_url}': window.location.href || ”,
};
for (var name in data) {
if (!data.hasOwnProperty(name)) continue;
var v = data[name];
if (typeof v !== ‘string’) continue;
for (var tag in subs) {
if (v.indexOf(tag) !== -1) v = v.split(tag).join(subs[tag]);
}
data[name] = v;
}
// Agent/BDM attribution — read LIVE so it works even on a fully cached
// page (the browser always sees the real URL + cookie). URL ?ataid=/?cid=
// first, then the 30-day agent_id/cid cookies set by atat-tracking.php.
var _qp = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search);
var _ataid = _qp.get(‘ataid’) || (document.cookie.match(/(?:^|;s*)agent_id=([^;]+)/) || [])[1] || ”;
var _cid = _qp.get(‘cid’) || (document.cookie.match(/(?:^|;s*)cid=([^;]+)/) || [])[1] || ”;
if (_ataid) data.agent_id = decodeURIComponent(_ataid);
if (_cid) data.bdm_id = decodeURIComponent(_cid);
return data;
}

function uploadFiles(data) {
var fileInputs = form.querySelectorAll(‘input[type=file][data-crm-file-field]’);
var uploads = [];
fileInputs.forEach(function(el) {
if (!el.files || !el.files[0]) return;
var fd = new FormData();
fd.append(‘file’, el.files[0]);
var fieldName = el.name;
uploads.push(
fetch(crmApiUrl + ‘/public/forms/’ + “08ceeaae-4809-444e-ba0f-88da5836c463″ + ‘/upload’, { method: ‘POST’, body: fd })
.then(function(r) {
if (!r.ok) throw new Error(‘File upload failed (‘ + r.status + ‘)’);
return r.json();
})
.then(function(res) {
if (res.path) data[fieldName] = res.path;
else throw new Error(res.error || ‘File upload failed’);
})
);
});
return Promise.all(uploads).then(function() { return data; });
}

function submitFormData(data) {
var body = new FormData();
body.append(‘action’, ‘p118_crm_submit’);
body.append(‘form_id’, “08ceeaae-4809-444e-ba0f-88da5836c463″);
body.append(‘data’, JSON.stringify(data));
// Embed-page context for GF-style merge tags ({embed_url},
// {embed_post:post_title}, {embed_post:ID}). Captured PHP-side
// at render time, then echoed to JS so the submit fetch can
// forward to V2 as request headers.
body.append(‘embed_url’, “”);
body.append(‘embed_post_id’, “0”);
body.append(‘embed_post_title’, “”);

return fetch(“https://www.property118.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php”, { method: ‘POST’, body: body, credentials: ‘same-origin’ })
.then(function(r){ return r.json(); })
.then(function(res){
var p = res.data || res;
if (p && p.success) {
if (p.confirmationType === ‘form’ && p.nextFormId) {
return swapInNextForm(p.nextFormId, p.prefill || {});
}
if (p.confirmationType === ‘redirect’ && p.confirmationRedirectUrl) {
window.location.href = p.confirmationRedirectUrl;
} else {
form.style.display = ‘none';
msg.className = ‘crm-message success';
msg.innerHTML = p.confirmationMessage || ‘Thank you for your submission.';
msg.style.display = ‘block';
}
} else {
throw new Error((p && p.error) || ‘Submission failed.’);
}
});
}

// Replace this whole form widget with another form, rendered server-side
// with the carried-over values seeded in. Inline injected via
// innerHTML won’t run, so we re-create each script node to execute it
// (this is what wires up the new form’s submit / conditional logic).
function swapInNextForm(nextFormId, prefill) {
var rbody = new FormData();
rbody.append(‘action’, ‘p118_crm_render_form’);
rbody.append(‘form_id’, nextFormId);
rbody.append(‘prefill’, JSON.stringify(prefill || {}));
return fetch(“https://www.property118.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php”, { method: ‘POST’, body: rbody, credentials: ‘same-origin’ })
.then(function(r){ return r.json(); })
.then(function(res2){
var pd = res2.data || res2;
if (!pd || !pd.html) { throw new Error((pd && pd.error) || ‘Could not load the next form.’); }
var frag = document.createElement(‘div’);
frag.innerHTML = pd.html;
var parent = wrap.parentNode;
var nodes = [];
while (frag.firstChild) {
var node = frag.firstChild;
parent.insertBefore(node, wrap);
nodes.push(node);
}
parent.removeChild(wrap);
function reexec(old) {
var s = document.createElement(‘script’);
for (var a = 0; a < old.attributes.length; a++) {
s.setAttribute(old.attributes[a].name, old.attributes[a].value);
}
if (!old.src) { s.textContent = old.textContent; }
old.parentNode.replaceChild(s, old);
}
nodes.forEach(function(n){
if (n.tagName === 'SCRIPT') { reexec(n); }
else if (n.querySelectorAll) {
var scripts = n.querySelectorAll('script');
for (var k = 0; k < scripts.length; k++) { reexec(scripts[k]); }
}
});
var first = nodes[0];
try { if (first && first.scrollIntoView) first.scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth', block: 'start' }); } catch (e) {}
});
}

form.addEventListener('submit', function(e){
e.preventDefault();
// Validate required fields before submitting. Next only guards the pages
// before it, so the final page (and single-page forms) are checked here;
// jump to the first page that has a problem.
var vbad0 = crmFirstInvalid(null);
if (vbad0) { crmReportInvalid(vbad0); return; }
var data = collectFormData();
if (submitBtn) { submitBtn.disabled = true; submitBtn.textContent = 'Processing…'; }
msg.style.display = 'none';

// Standard form (no payment)
uploadFiles(data)
.then(function(d) { return submitFormData(d); })
.catch(function(err){
if (submitBtn) { submitBtn.disabled = false; submitBtn.textContent = btnText; }
msg.className = 'crm-message error';
msg.textContent = err.message;
msg.style.display = 'block';
});
});

// ── Repeater fields (add / remove rows) ──────────────────────────
form.querySelectorAll( '.crm-repeater' ).forEach( function ( rep ) {
var rowsWrap = rep.querySelector( '.crm-repeater-rows' );
var tpl = rep.querySelector( '.crm-repeater-template' );
var addBtn = rep.querySelector( '.crm-repeater-add' );
if ( addBtn && tpl && rowsWrap ) {
addBtn.addEventListener( 'click', function () {
var idx = parseInt( rep.getAttribute( 'data-next-index' ) || '1', 10 );
var tmp = document.createElement( 'div' );
tmp.innerHTML = tpl.innerHTML.split( '__ROW__' ).join( idx );
var row = tmp.firstElementChild;
if ( ! row ) { return; }
row.setAttribute( 'data-row', idx );
rowsWrap.appendChild( row );
rep.setAttribute( 'data-next-index', idx + 1 );
rep.dispatchEvent( new CustomEvent( 'crm-repeater-change', { bubbles: true } ) );
} );
}
if ( rowsWrap ) {
rowsWrap.addEventListener( 'click', function ( e ) {
var btn = e.target.closest ? e.target.closest( '.crm-repeater-remove' ) : null;
if ( ! btn ) { return; }
if ( rowsWrap.querySelectorAll( '.crm-repeater-row' ).length <= 1 ) { return; }
var r = btn.closest( '.crm-repeater-row' );
if ( r ) { r.remove(); }
rep.dispatchEvent( new CustomEvent( 'crm-repeater-change', { bubbles: true } ) );
} );
}
} );
})();

The post Section 8 Possession and Disability Discrimination: The Defence Landlords Can’t Afford to Ignore appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Section 8 Possession and Disability Discrimination: The Defence Landlords Can’t Afford to Ignore

Jul
6

Government promises to help landlords with EPC costs

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

Government promises to help landlords with EPC costs

The government claims financial support is available to landlords to meet EPC targets.

In answer to a written parliamentary question, the government claim they want to expand the availability of private finance options to help landlords meet energy-efficiency targets.

The government has announced all private rented properties will need to meet EPC C targets by 2030.

Support is available to help landlords

Liberal Democrat MP Gideon Amos asked the government what financial support will be available to landlords to meet EPC C targets.

Minister for energy consumers Martin McCluskey said: “Support is currently available to help landlords improve their properties, including through the Warm Homes: Local Grant and the Boiler Upgrade Scheme, and a zero-rate of VAT until March 2027 on energy-saving measures.

“An eligibility tool is available at the government webpage ‘Find Ways to Save Energy in your Home’, which provides tailored recommendations for home improvements to increase energy efficiency and clean heat.

“More widely, we are continuing to explore longer-term options to stimulate greater availability of private finance options.

“As part of the Warm Homes Plan, the government will establish a Strategic Partnership with the green home finance sector to help build and diversify the range of green financing options available from the broader market.”

Cost not worth the hassle

The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) have previously told Property118 that many landlords will decide the cost of retrofitting is not worth the hassle and choose to sell up.

Chris Norris, chief policy officer for the NRLA, said: “We are firmly of the view that rental properties must be as energy efficient as practicable. However, it is simply not feasible for every property in the market to be retrofitted to meet an EPC ‘C’ rating within the previously proposed time frame.

“The current proposal doesn’t take into account the varying age and condition of housing stock inside and outside of the PRS, the complexity of the work required, or the lack of appropriately skilled tradespeople needed to make improvements.

“Many landlords will therefore have little choice but to sell properties that will be difficult, and excessively costly, to retrofit. This will reduce the supply of available rental properties further reducing available housing during the ongoing, and acute, supply and demand crisis.

“Ministers need to develop a targeted programme of support to facilitate investment, as the Committee on Fuel Poverty and Citizens Advice has previously recommended.”

The post Government promises to help landlords with EPC costs appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Government promises to help landlords with EPC costs

Jul
6

Shelter claims housing crisis driving anxiety among working people

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

Shelter claims housing crisis driving anxiety among working people

Shelter claims workers are suffering sleepless nights over housing costs.

Research by the housing charity claims more than half (53%) of working people in England say the cost of housing has made them feel anxious in the last six months.

The news comes as Shelter and HSBC have renewed their partnership for a further two years to show the realities of the housing crisis.

Negotiating with landlords and preventing eviction

According to the research, one in three (32%) have had to cut back on food and groceries to afford housing costs. A further 16% have had to sell possessions to meet their housing costs.

Shelter’s emergency helpline manager, Nadeem Khan, claims the housing charity provides support for tenants in negotiating with landlords.

Mr Khan said: “This new research shows the impact of the housing emergency on people’s mental health across the country, as millions feel the effects of sleepless nights spent worrying about how to afford essential housing costs.

“Our frontline teams hear from younger people, older people and parents every day who are under immense strain, grappling with impossible trade-offs to make ends meet. It can make a big difference if people reach out before they hit crisis point.

“At Shelter we can help with expert advice on things like managing arrears and creating affordable household budgets, to support on negotiating with landlords, accessing benefits and preventing eviction.

“It is through partnerships like ours with HSBC UK that we can continue to be there for those worst affected by the housing emergency, and help more people find and keep a safe, stable home.”

Fund Shelter’s services

HSBC UK head of sustainability and societal purpose, Natalie Gregoire-Skeete, said: “We recognise that poor financial resilience and housing insecurity often go hand in hand. We are determined to support Shelter’s vital work, ensuring that those most at risk can access practical advice and vital support in moments of crisis.

“Through our renewed partnership, HSBC UK will continue to back Shelter’s community outreach and emergency services, helping people navigate these challenges and find greater stability.”

In a press release, HSBC says it will continue to fund Shelter’s services, including its emergency helpline and webchat, alongside in-person advice hubs across the country.

The post Shelter claims housing crisis driving anxiety among working people appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Shelter claims housing crisis driving anxiety among working people

Categories

Archives

Calendar

July 2026
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Recent Posts

Quick Search

RSS More from Letting Links

Facebook Fan Page